This story is a crock. It sounds like something written for a Lifetime movie.
The true story probably involves dozens of uses of the F word, lots of alcohol, banshee wailing, the throwing of objects and a call to the big guy that probably carried the meds.
If Hillary really was the Lifetime heroine, she would have addressed her bawling followers that night and given a moving speech for the ages. But she didn’t, because she was sedated.
You are so right. There is no way she said anything close to this, on that night or since. This is their rewrite of history to make her less ruthless and more victimized.
Pathetic.
Well all they did was edit out the x-rated language and actions which would have been most of the story. :-)
We would have had an emotional puppet of the men around her as president did she win.She would have been a picture of the First Woman President but that is all she would have been, a picture and men would have been the substance. Very few women can rule. Maggie Thatcher she could not be.
If Hillary really was the Lifetime heroine, she would have addressed her bawling followers that night and given a moving speech for the ages. But she didn’t, because she was sedated.
And if a conservative had not given a presidential election concession speech, it would be a front page news scandal for three years.
“...she would have addressed her bawling followers that night and given a moving speech for the ages. But she didn’t, because she was sedated.”
Interesting theory on sedation. I’ll keep that in mind, though I don’t think the truth will ever be told as to what really went on. But have a chance of getting close to the truth of the matter, a different strategy is needed. When she shows up at book signings, conservative media members should show up, even if they have to pay, and just make up questions to see her reaction. The left does this all the time. Consider what they do to Trump - “We hear you have been irate and discussing in private that you want to fire Mueller next week. Is that true?” Of course the reporters never heard it, they just made up the question to see how he will react and respond, and to see if he is thinking about it.
HRC should be asked similarly about election night, like...”It is reported that you did not show up on election night because you passed out just like you did on 9/11/16 in NYC and had to be dragged to a safe place. Can you tell us why that happened election night, why it took you so long to make a concession speech, and did you have the same medical treatment to bring you back?” “Were you ever sedated on election night?” Even when she denies it, keep pressing her to describe exactly what she did that night and why. My guess is that her handlers would get the questioner removed. Having 15 or 20 people there doing this in sequence would be necessary to blunt the effectiveness of removing questioners, and then another story begins to take shape.
My theory is that when she lost, it was totally unexpected. Look at their outrage at Trump after the debate when he said he’ll get back to them on conceding if he lost the election. Their anger about Trump undermining democracy, etc etc .... (and not once has she ever been asked this question why her post-election behavior doesn’t undermine the same.) When there was no “Al Gore opportunity” available to give even a pretext of legitimacy to challenge the results, she/they had to begin thinking that their dirty dealing and criminal behavior in the primaries and general campaign and in the government would very likely be exposed once out of power in the next 2 months. They were shocked at the results and were panicked.
If Trump were not elected, none of this (and more) would ever come to light in at least a generation, if not longer.
For this I am thankful under the circumstances.
I hadn't watched any cable or network news for years, but there was no way I wasn't going to watch the returns in 2016. The most bizarre thing I've ever seen in my 70 years was a that a losing Presidential candidate did not make an appearance to concede, and thank the people who had worked tirelessly for her. Those people at the Javitz Center had been there all day, waiting for the polls to close, and although defeated, they stuck around because they figured their fearless leader would be coming to the center. But she didn't show, didn't even connect with them through a satellite hook-up. Instead, she sends her flunky John Podesta out to imitate Ferris Bueller, and tell everyone that the show is over, and that they should all go home. I've always known that Hillary was a self-serving b*tch, with a horrible temper, and an ingrate, but that night she really showed how little she cared for the people who had worked their a$$es off for her throughout the campaign. The sad thing is that most of those fools have never realized how much she had taken them for granted, used them, and then simply dumped them like garbage.