Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rules narrowly for Colorado baker who wouldn't make same-sex wedding cake
Cnbc.com

Posted on 06/04/2018 7:26:16 AM PDT by hercuroc

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a narow victory to a Christian baker from Colorado who refused for religious reasons to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bakethecake; fakebutaccurate; homosexualagenda; mediabias; pinkjournalism; ruling; scotus; ssm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2018 7:26:16 AM PDT by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

“Narrowly”? I thought it was a 7-2 decision in favor of the bakery.


2 posted on 06/04/2018 7:27:36 AM PDT by Theo (FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

7-2 is narrow?


3 posted on 06/04/2018 7:27:52 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

7-2.


4 posted on 06/04/2018 7:27:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

Narrow victory? The other thread on this said it was 7-2.


5 posted on 06/04/2018 7:28:01 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

Is there any more to this story at the link you didn’t post?


6 posted on 06/04/2018 7:29:08 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

CNN called it “narrow” of course, but they are also saying “6-2”. ?


7 posted on 06/04/2018 7:29:17 AM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

That’s what i thought when I read that.
Lol


8 posted on 06/04/2018 7:29:32 AM PDT by hercuroc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc
Opinion here
9 posted on 06/04/2018 7:29:34 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

I object to my government’s use of the word “gay” to describe homosexuals.

The word ‘gay’ does not mean “homosexual”. It was a 1950’s description of themselves to try to change the perception they are sad sack misfits with a mental illness.


10 posted on 06/04/2018 7:30:03 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theo

It is cNBC reporting.....


11 posted on 06/04/2018 7:30:06 AM PDT by Road Warrior 04 (Molon Labe! Oathkeeper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theo

I think the word “narrow” means the decision does not have broad implications, but rather can only be applied in narrow circumstances. Whether that’s correct or not, I can’t say.


12 posted on 06/04/2018 7:30:36 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

By a 7-2 blow out we find that is we find people morally repulsive we can kick them out of our business asserting freedom of religion!! this is a great day for the constitution and Christians everywhere that detest abomination to God!!


13 posted on 06/04/2018 7:31:47 AM PDT by raiderboy (" we’ll close down the country because we need border" DJT NOW !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

That is the correct decision. The court decided against the procedures and decision making of the so called Civil Rights Case not on whether the state has the right to force the baker to make the cake.


14 posted on 06/04/2018 7:32:38 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Theo

Narrow, as in addressing very specific details of the case, not a broad win for free speech or religious liberty.


15 posted on 06/04/2018 7:32:41 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

Mike Farris of ADF, pled this case in front of the USSC.

He’ll be at the Western Conservative Summit this weekend, where I hope to get to speak with him.

We were on the Chess Club at Park Junior High.....1965


16 posted on 06/04/2018 7:32:53 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hercuroc

OUTSTANDING!


17 posted on 06/04/2018 7:32:58 AM PDT by kenmcg (tHE WHOLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

Interesting. So the same Supreme court which imposed homosexual marriage, is also of the opinion that those in the wedding business don’t have to service homosexual weddings.


18 posted on 06/04/2018 7:33:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Expected commentary.

Scotus Blog.

19 posted on 06/04/2018 7:33:51 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

That sounds like a good explanation.


20 posted on 06/04/2018 7:33:55 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson