1 posted on
06/27/2018 7:04:17 AM PDT by
luv2ski
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: luv2ski
To: luv2ski
So no more forced union dues?
3 posted on
06/27/2018 7:05:36 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
("We were designed as gardeners, not cubicle rats." (/robroys woman))
To: luv2ski
I am STILL not tired of all this WINNING!!!
4 posted on
06/27/2018 7:05:47 AM PDT by
TheStickman
(#MAGA all day every day!)
To: luv2ski
5 posted on
06/27/2018 7:05:56 AM PDT by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: luv2ski
6 posted on
06/27/2018 7:05:58 AM PDT by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: luv2ski
To: luv2ski
8 posted on
06/27/2018 7:06:58 AM PDT by
hsmomx3
To: luv2ski
10 posted on
06/27/2018 7:07:11 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(When Obama and VJ go to prison for treason, will Roseanne get her show back?...)
To: luv2ski
Was it 8-1, with just Kagan dissenting?
11 posted on
06/27/2018 7:07:31 AM PDT by
BlessedBeGod
(To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
To: luv2ski
Court holds that union fees violate "the free speech rights of nonmembers by compelling them to subsidize private speech on matters of substantial public concern.
Unions become voluntary!
12 posted on
06/27/2018 7:07:35 AM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: luv2ski
Does this mean the death of public employee unions? No more forced union dues means no more large political contributions to Democrats which means politicians do not need to kiss the ass of union leaders.
14 posted on
06/27/2018 7:07:50 AM PDT by
CIB-173RDABN
(US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
To: luv2ski
Oh, the leftist butt hurt from this one will be immense.
To: luv2ski
from SCOTUS blog: In reasonably plain English: This is a case about whether government employees who are represented by a union to which they do not belong can be required to pay a fee to cover the costs of collective bargaining. The plaintiff in this case, an Illinois state employee, argued that having to pay the fees violates the First Amendment. Today the Court agreed, ruling for the employee and against the union.
19 posted on
06/27/2018 7:08:50 AM PDT by
luv2ski
To: luv2ski
also from SCOTUS blog: Of practical importance, the Court also holds that employees must affirmatively consent before fees can be withheld from their paychecks —the system must be opt-in, not opt-out.
26 posted on
06/27/2018 7:09:54 AM PDT by
luv2ski
To: luv2ski
YES! More Winning!
Great DAYS AHEAD!
27 posted on
06/27/2018 7:09:55 AM PDT by
djstex
(The REAL News of The Day ... Trump is Our President EVERYDAY! :))
To: luv2ski
p. 44–47. 3. For these reasons, States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. The First Amendment is violated when money is taken from nonconsenting employees for a public-sector union; employees must choose to support the union before anything is taken from them. Accordingly, neither an agency fee nor any other form of payment to a public-sector union may be deducted from an employee, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay. Pp. 48–49. 851 F. 3d 746, reversed and remanded.
29 posted on
06/27/2018 7:10:31 AM PDT by
Licensed-To-Carry
(Sessions isn't gonna do crap about Hillary, he is part of the Swamp.)
To: luv2ski
This is a HUGE deal.
I ain’t no ways tarred of WINNING!
To: luv2ski
34 posted on
06/27/2018 7:11:22 AM PDT by
ealgeone
To: luv2ski
I just overdosed on winning🙃🙃🙃😉😉😉🤪🤪🤪🤪
37 posted on
06/27/2018 7:11:45 AM PDT by
GonzoII
("If the new crime be, to believe in God, let us all be criminals" -Sheen)
To: luv2ski
Abood is overruled! No more public-union theft of the hard-earned money of workers. Thank goodness Gorsuch, instead of Garland, was there.
40 posted on
06/27/2018 7:12:25 AM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson