Posted on 07/13/2018 7:43:41 AM PDT by bitt
Reading the INDICTMENT now it’s interesting as i don’t recall Rosenstein speaking at all that the republican party was also hacked by these guys as follows:
“The Conspirators also released documents they had stolen in other spear phishing operations, including those they had conducted in 2015 that collected emails from individuals
affiliated with the Republican Party.”
Object of the Conspiracy
70. The object of the conspiracy was to hack into protected computers of persons and entities
charged with the administration ofthe 2016 U.S. elections in order to access those computers and
steal voter data and other information stored on those computers.
Manner and Means of the Conspiracv
71. In or around June 2016, KOVALEV and his co—conspirators researched domains used by
U.S. state boards of elections, secretaries of state, and other election-related entities for website
vulnerabilities. KOVALEV and his co-conspirators also searched for state political party email
addresses, including filtered queries for email addresses listed on state Republican Party websites.
Actually these guys hacked into the republicans e-mails as well as election officials and anything to do with the election......... It’s just it certainly appears Rosenstein wants this to be seen as cause for Hillary’s loss even though the DNC hired a Security company early on in 2016 to stop it and did. According to the indictment.
Then Guccifer and another picked it up from there....which is old news and they were caught.
“The Conspirators also released documents they had stolen in other spear phishing operations, including those they had conducted in 2015 that collected emails from individuals affiliated with the Republican Party.”
Apparently only when the Dems were hacked in 2016 did the Just-us Department and the Federal Bureau of Weasels became interested.
The FBI figured out who hacked the DNC server without ever even looking at the server? Wow... how clever.
Well this is all political manipulation about trying to prevent Trump from running in 2020 and continue protecting the demorats from discovery so that they can run their candidates 2020.
This while especially continuing to protect Hillary/Bo/and all the others who have committed criminal activities. Has nothing to do but to regain the power they lost and to avoid jail until the next Pres. election.
I’m sure Trump didn’t make contact with Russian operatives.
Can you imagine if Rosenstein or Mueller could connect the dots there?
Whether he knew or not, they’d play it as if it was the crime of the new century.
That VAPID LOSER.
“:^)
I agree with your take on things there.
Thanks for the pointer.
Crooks think everyone is a crook. They frequently say things like, “But everyone does it.” No, actually they don’t.
No, the narrative is that this was all focused on the poor little Democrats and their poor little candidate.
This sort of thing has been going on in some version since humans became political beings.
Director James Comey said last year that the DNC had denied the bureau’s requests to examine the breached servers.
Comey said at the time that the FBI and DNC agreed to let a private firm access the servers and share the findings with investigators.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/388507-trump-why-didnt-dnc-hand-over-hacked-server-to-fbi
So this begs the question.. This all based on the word of the DNC
Did the FBI ever get the DNC Servers?
If not, then why are the FBI believing the DNC?
How did they come to this conclustion without the DNC Servers?
Recall at yesterday when old pittbull Shelia Jackson raised this photo....it's all about pointing away from Hillary/Ob to Russia....in order to prevent Trumps run in 2020.and hide their own criminal activities...and they will willingly stoop to any ridiculous measures and means to do so. Becuase it's better than jail and the continued loss of their power....
How utterly ridiculous was this!
I think this is one of those let the DNC skate as its easier to blame the Russians who will probably never step foot in this country.
FWIW Brenden Dilley in his scope was positioning it as further steps in the exoneration of Trump by the Mueller/Rosenstein team.
Here is who was involved. It had nothing to do with Trump or his team or any Americans, etc.
I hope his rosy picture is correct, but I’m not decided definitely one way or the other.
I might agree in time but as of date I can’t buy it as it all feeds the Demorats just more information to point away from themselves.
I’m sure she was raising that photo to pretest Manafort being held in solitary confinement.
You’re right on target > IMO.
I’m with you. Can only take in the various information sources and angles, without conclusive findings for now.
If you you read the indictment, it explains how the DNC and DCCC got hacked. They didn’t go into great detail, but enough to satisfy my curoisity. If you read between the lines they were able to analyse network equipment and other computer logs. The hackers were inside the organizations for quite some time. It took some time to hack the DNC Exchange server.
I listened to Donna Brazile’s book “Hacked” with her doing the audio about her replacement time as DNC chair after DWS was canned.
The DNC was in the middle of an election. I do not find it surprising that they did not want to shut down their own system and turn servers over to the FBI in the middle of that election nor do I find it surprising that law enforcement didn’t kill their entire system and drag it off in the middle of the election.
They brought in the silicon valley experts they could get gratis and an entire team rebuilt and re-hardened the site and its software while it was still up and operating. Their internal morals made them believe that Trump was connected with the Russian hacking but they knew it was the Russians from early on according to her detailed account.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.