FBI needs to assess the Credibility of Christine Blasey Ford’s Assertions and Motivation

me | 10/01/2018 | me

[babbabooey]

It is time for the FBI to assess the Credibility of Christine Blasey Ford’s Assertions and Motivation.

Senator Blumenthal has reminded us that, “Falsus in Uno, Falsus in Omnibus” (a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter) must be considered in assessing a witness’s testimony in a search for the truth. Unfortunately, it is not be politically correct for the Republicans, Judge Kavanaugh (who does not wish Ford any “ill-will”), or our news media to question Mrs. Ford’s credibility. However, it is possible for the FBI or DOJ to investigate false statements made to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The implications of a serious charge of sexual assault go beyond this one Supreme Court Nominee; Beyond, the destruction of Judge Kavanaugh’s life and honor; Beyond, Roe v. Wade; & Beyond, Mrs. Ford’s need for retribution. It will be the standard of how the future of men will be judged in courts, business, school, work and life. Will it be by the new #metoo standard of uncorroborated accusations and political motivations; or, by due process and a search for the truth? (If you don’t believe me, watch Chris Wallace’s interview of National Woman’s Law Center on Fox News Sunday, Sept. 30th)

I do not intend for this to turn into a James Carville freak show (19th hole accusations by Joe Digenova), but it is time that we Freepers use this platform & work together to compile a list of false or contradictory statements by Christine Blasey Ford to assess her credibility.

After completion, we must forward this to anyone that can get this in front of a Senator and /or DOJ/FBI or even, a media advocate or surrogate that can take the proper actions:

1. Claustrophobia due to the Kavanaugh Assault (36 yrs ago!):
   1. Prevented her from flying to testify
   2. Frequent Airplane Trips
2. Second Front Door
   1. The date of installation; there is evidence that the door was installed in 2008 & Google maps & pictures that show a front door in prior to her recalling her repressed memory during marriage counseling in 2012.
      1. http://ww= w.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3692266/posts
   2. Does you home have any side doors, or a back door? (As required by code)
   3. Was the primary purpose used to sublet an apartment to Google Interns? Did your renovations include a 2nd bath/shower for the apartment? Did you receive any income from any of the 19 people listed to receive mail from your address? Did you declare that income on your taxes?
   4. Was her therapist 2nd place of business the need for her 2nd front door & her business address listed there.
   5. Was the memory of her encounter with Bret Kavanaugh a result of recessed memory by her therapist?
      1. Will you release your therapist notes?
   6. Were you residing near the east coast while your lawyers informed the Senate Staffers you were unable to fly for an interview?
      a. You stated you were unaware of the offer of Senate Staffer's to fly out to Calif. To interview you? Did you watch or read any news on the weekend prior to your testimony.
3. Was your internet social activity deleted by you, or by your direction? Was it saved?
   1. Why did you think it was necessary to delete your internet social footprint?
4. Did you ever use Whatsapp to send encrypted messages prior to your interactions with Democratic Operatives, Democrat Attorneys and the Media?
5. Her Lawyers have some explaining to do (no attorney-client privilege for a crime). A la Michael Cohen (Office & Home Raid.);
6. Subpoena her & lawyers emails/text/phone records; &
7. Subpoena the therapists records.
8. Have you ever made a charge that someone else may have assaulted you?
9. Have you ever been on or now taking any medications? Or diagnosed with a mental illness or condition?
10. Did you read the Mark Judge Book? When?
11. Etc. etc.

[babbabooey]

Note: Unfortunately, I am one of those hard-working Americans who does not have the time for Political Activism. I welcome anyone hijacking this thread and/or moving it to a Wiki Project.

[stockpirate]

Duh

[ThinkingBuddha]

Unfortunately, the FBI has now been corrupted and politicized; I do not trust them, to be fair and objective.

[NEMDF]

You make some great points. I do not expect the FBI to try to find any of these answers, though. It would be a very pleasant surprise if they did.

[freedumb2003]

>>
3. Was your internet social activity deleted by you, or by your direction? Was it saved?
Why did you think it was necessary to delete your internet social footprint?
<<

This is a stupid question — remember that one bad (dumb) plank can make your whole platform fall.

ANYONE not a celebrity or politico thrust into the public eye will delete their social media presence.

Smart people like me don’t have one.

[House Atreides]

Many other problems with her lying testimony. For example, the store where she claimed to see Mark Judge working several weeks after “the party” WASN’T BUILT UNTIL SEVERAL YEARS LATER.

The FBI should investigate/DOCUMENT ALL this and put the information in their report to Congress .... but they probably won’t.

[Liz]

Polls just in show WRT the Judiciary hearing believability, it’s a wash. And, for Democrats, that is an absolute nightmare.

Love hearing bad news for Dems......

They connived like thieves.....had it all planned.

They’d lacerate Kav and Repubs ......and collect the votes at midterm.

Too frickin’ bad.....that aint happening.

[House Atreides]

I do not expect the FBI to try to find any of these answers, though. It would be a very pleasant surprise if they did.
*********************************************

FReepers and others already have most of it. The FBI simply needs to CONFIRM, DOCUMENT, REPORT. If they don’t, they will reveal themselves to be as bad and as corrupt as the McCabes & Comeys!

[Qiviut]

For example, the store where she claimed to see Mark Judge working several weeks after “the party” WASN’T BUILT UNTIL SEVERAL YEARS LATER.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Unfortunately, the ‘it wasn’t there until 1986’ Safeway story has been disproved. It has been confirmed by 2 sources at least that the Safeway, with 2 doors, was there in 1982.

Here’s a link to an FR comment/thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/3692305/posts?page=62#62

[antidemoncrat]

The thing that struck me from the get-go was with all of her education and world travel, she had to have her lawyer explain the she had to stand and raise her right hand to be sworn in. To me her whole innocent little girl testimony was a sham.

[JimRed]

Bull$hit on credibility. They need to assess FACTS and EVIDENCE. Nothing else.

[z3n]

On the face of it, it seems very difficult to avoid looking into the credibility of the accuser’s facts when you are charged with investigating an incident that the accuser claims happened, but you are right; All you have to do is look at how the so-called investigation into Hillary’s email and server to demonstrate how it’s very possible to investigate with extreme bias

[Starboard]

The FBI won’t investigate anything or anyone who can shed light on Ford’s baseless accusations. We all know the rank stench of political partisanship that runs through the agency.

They just won’t do it. They will turn a blind eye toward anything that damages her “credibility”.

[Mouton]

As Joe Friday used to say, just stick to the facts. I don't want a side show into her motivation which is at best a subjective evaluation. The facts are simple, she made an unsustainable accusation, unsupported too. The accused said he did not do it, was not there, and would never have done such a thing as alleged, not as portrayed in the press as attempted rape. He has used witnesses provided by the accuser to rebut the allegation. Seems to me the facts are piled up on the it did not happen side of the fulcrum.

[JimRed]

The FBI should investigate/DOCUMENT ALL this and put the information in their report to Congress .... but they probably won’t.

Who has oversight on the FBI? If they fail to be impartial and stick to facts and evidence, they must be corrected.

[wastoute]

Find a vid of DeGenova on Steve HIlton last night. Well, sorry, I tried just now and there isn’t one on the internet. Isn’t that something? Tl/dr, he was enraged. He ended “If you believe this woman I hope you ROT IN HELL!” This guy argued cases in the SCOTUS for a living and is pretty eloquent but ROT IN HELL was what he had to say for Ford.

[wastoute]

Her lawyers have ALREADY complained they aren’t talking to her.

[ManHunter]

Well, for many of us these days, the Bureau isn’t exactly seen as trustworthy.

[ManHunter]

And exactly who or what agency will assess the credibility of the FBI, which is very much in question of late?

[grumpygresh]

The FBI wont investigate the accuser, because the FBI is corrupt from top to bottom.

Investigations are supposed to be even handed, but that’s not the way that they operate.