Posted on 11/04/2018 6:10:07 AM PST by Kaslin
Exactly. I don’t put much stock in propaganda articles — written by either side.
Join the American majority.
Only answer calls from people who are on your contact list. A call that matters from an unknown number will leave you a voice message detailing why they called. Convince your friends and relatives to do the same.
Together we can make this a supermajority.
So that explains the goofy, OMG! face on the goon-faced Halfrican when he met the impressive president-elect.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My favorite picture is the one of all the Obama staffers the day after the election, out on the portico while Obama congratulated Trump on his election win. The staffers, including ValJar, looked like their best friends, family and pets had all died at the same time. I’m sure many of them had been in and out of the bathroom all day with the runs at the thought of “oh sh!t ... all that bad stuff we’ve been doing now needs to be covered up!”
Pictures at link ... the one that sticks in my mind the most is the 6th one down entitled “Grim: Valerie Jarrett (foreground) who is Obama’s senior adviser, watched from the side as the president spoke about the Clinton defeat”
In Chicago parlance "Senior Adviser" means Wire-Transfer Artist.
This time around, the DOJ and patriots are watching for and documenting voter fraud and many are being rounded up and prosecuted.
Yep. Less than 80,000 votes in three states would have given Hillary the presidency.
He ( the author ) meant an electoral landslide and given the media and pollster predictions- it clearly was a landslide for the president
Where are you getting this crap from? It was 304-227 - that is a blowout
PA (20 EVs): 44K
WI (10 EVs): 23K
MI (16 EVs): 11K
Flip those states on less than an 80K vote difference, and Hillary is POTUS.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_Electoral_College_margin 2016 was 46th of 58 presidential elections in electoral vote margin.
My guess on ‘why Hillary the Witch lost’ was that Ed Randell underestimated the number of ballots needed to stuff the boxes for a Hillary win.
The little cheats won’t make that mistake again...
We need to watch every ‘close’ race - ‘cause that’s where the fraud will happen.
Well, the Dems regained control of the Senate in 1986 after losing it in 1980. I suspect the author was confused.
Exactly so!
No pollster, even those that WANT to be accurate instead of spin, has error margins that cannot predict such small shifts. But notice that they NEVER admit that.
Polling across House races using a standard methodology isn’t done, so aggregators are forced to merely project, same as any non-pro.
Safest to rely on historical patterns and incumbency. Average mid-term election loss in the House is 23 seats. There are 58 open seats. It is those two facts that cause the projection of Dems retaking the House. Other reasons having anything to do with Trump cited by pros are just smokescreen. Dems need to flip around 24 seats, very doable by historic standards, Trump having nothing to do with it.
But a show of support for Trump of almost any size might be enough to keep the Dems below the historic average seat gains and keep the House in GOP control.
I just hope this year is like 2016!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.