Skip to comments.
Gun owner helps save Missouri mother of 3 during violent attack after hearing (T)
foxnews.com ^
| 11/7/2018
| Travis Fedschun
Posted on 11/07/2018 12:08:39 PM PST by rktman
Seadorf grabbed his registered 9-millimeter handgun and headed towards the screams. When he reached the source, he encountered Alarick Williams allegedly attacking a woman, who had some of her clothes ripped off, inside a car. The fight was occurring in front of the couple's three children, who were also in the vehicle.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: 2a; armedcitizen; banglist; kaba; missouri; mo
Registered? Okay MO FReepers, is that a requirement there? Or is it the typical lame stream lie to make folks think firearms MUST be "registered". Thank you sir for your quick action.
1
posted on
11/07/2018 12:08:39 PM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
This incident happened in Kansas City, Missouri.
2
posted on
11/07/2018 12:20:31 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: rktman
If you’re thinking feral-American, you’re correct.
3
posted on
11/07/2018 12:24:36 PM PST
by
sparklite2
(See more at Sparklite Times)
To: Steely Tom
Okay....... Isn't that what I indicated? 👹
4
posted on
11/07/2018 12:24:52 PM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
Or is it the typical lame stream lie to make folks think firearms MUST be "registered". Me thinks said author is a clueless bafoon, who knows squat about gun ownership in MO. I've never had to "register" any firearm I've bought (assuming I've ever bought one), whether it was through an FFL or a private sale. I did have to get a CCW license pre universal CCW, which passed 3 or so years ago.
Maybe the author knows of some secret program that allows people to voluntarily pre-confiscation "register" their guns in order to make the government's job easier?
5
posted on
11/07/2018 12:26:33 PM PST
by
Turbo Pig
(Me thinks that the author wasn't a clue as to how things work in MO. regarding guns.)
To: Turbo Pig
Of course we hear it on tv crime shows quite frequently.
6
posted on
11/07/2018 12:38:08 PM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
I think the pistol pictured is a S&W M&P .380 EZ. Not a 9mm unless you call it 9mm Short, Corto or Kurz.
7
posted on
11/07/2018 12:42:53 PM PST
by
sjmjax
To: sparklite2
Carrying a firearm does NOT make someone “feral”
8
posted on
11/07/2018 12:42:56 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: rktman
To: BenLurkin
The attacker not the armed citizen.
10
posted on
11/07/2018 1:24:28 PM PST
by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: BenLurkin
The perp, not the shooter.
11
posted on
11/07/2018 1:24:52 PM PST
by
sparklite2
(See more at Sparklite Times)
To: sparklite2
“The perp, not the shooter.”...
..but a feral for certain.
12
posted on
11/07/2018 1:41:16 PM PST
by
DaveA37
To: rktman
Registered? Okay MO FReepers, is that a requirement there? Or is it the typical lame stream lie to make folks think firearms MUST be "registered". Thank you sir for your quick action.
As a Missourian, NO
13
posted on
11/07/2018 1:47:01 PM PST
by
painter
( Isaiah: �Woe to those who call evil good and good evil,")
To: rktman
There is no firearms registration in MO. They may have confused that with a CCW license, which is no longer mandatory either as long as you remain in the state. A Missouri CCW is recognized by about 2/3 of the other states. Thats the advantage of having one.
14
posted on
11/07/2018 1:52:24 PM PST
by
MCF
(If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo)
To: MCF
I’m thinking lazy and ignorant. Wouldn’t take much to do it right. But that might take some effort on the journalists part.
15
posted on
11/07/2018 1:57:17 PM PST
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
From the late 1870s until the advent of the 2005 concealed carry endorsement, there was a requirement for anyone purchasing a handgun to get a “permit to acquire” from their local Sherriff. Jim Crow at its finest. The Modern 2005 CCW permit/license process did away with that. There is no recording of what concealed weapon one may carry other with or w/o a CCW license ( there are lots of benefits of having the CCW license, and no real drawbacks in MO. Records of the permit are closed to anyone w/o a court order ( other than your sheriff) and it is recognized by 38 other sates. The semi- constitutional carry (permit-less is good, but requires folks to mind the posted signs whereas a license holder can pretty much ignore such baloney, only federal restrictions and court houses etc are actually off limits with legal ramifications), plus having documented training and a permit often makes a difference in how a shooting is looked at by media and LE/DA etc. Shows good faith.
16
posted on
11/07/2018 8:23:37 PM PST
by
Manly Warrior
(US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson