Posted on 11/15/2018 8:06:39 AM PST by Simon Green
Better outlaw those evil rubber bands, too.
Thank Sessions.
“Q”
Since when does the DOJ issue definitions of NFA? That has been the authority of the AFT, a branch of the Treasury department.
Many of the AR-15s displayed by the Clark County Sheriff had bi-pods on them. Wouldn’t this negate the advantage of a “bump fire stock?” The weapon could not “recoil” sufficiently to re-charge it, I wouldn’t think. But I’ve never owned a bump stock.
He is gone, or didn’t you get the memo???
No delegated power for the NFA. It’s all just progressive lawlessness.
Department of Justice issued ...
Cowardly bureaucrats. Just like the leftist editorial boards. I want names; they are pubic servants after all. If we had the names, we could at least complain to our elected representatives, sign petitions etc.
Oh, I’ll just leave the tying error.
Rubber bands are far superior to bump-stocks.
Idiocy aside, I note that the ruling says “When attached to a firearm”.
So, it is legal when not attached.
This is more of that idiotic stuff, like the ATF claiming that a wrist-brace for a pistol AR is legal, but the second you SHOULDER it, it becomes an SBR.
Read the description - it is FALSE.
While using a bump stock, the fire arm remains semi-automatic. To fire a round, it still requires that the trigger be manually operated.
Time for a lawsuit - which 2nd amendment group is going to file? I kind of doubt that it will be the NRA.
Technically true I guess
“Better outlaw those evil rubber bands, too.”
Are shoe strings in or out today? They have been all over the BATFE map in the past.
“President Trump has now implemented more gun control in his first two years than Obama did in eight”
He didn’t...Sessions did.
Whatever you do, DO NOT tell them about belt loops!
Read where you can achieve the same thing with bungee cords.
Thanks. You’ve just given the feds the justification to arrest anyone they want if that person is in possession of a rubber band. And I don’t make that statement lightly. Stupider things have happened.
I understand the ignorance of the general public as it pertains to guns, automatics, etc. I mention this because I'm sure a huge portion of the population shares my sentiment. They ( and I ) think this is no big deal.
The perception of these twice-monthly mass shootings is becoming a problem. Facts won't matter. It's becoming an issue, and I suspect will become more of an elective issue for conservatives. DJT seems to be on the verge of tweaking gun laws to stem the blowback. So, imho, this and tweaks to enforcement, and mental health evaluations are pre-emptive and perhaps helpful 1st steps.
Please advise why I'm misguided, and then evaluate if your argument will hold up against the anti-gunners out there.
Trump did no such thing, and you damn well know it.
Next thing you know the sons of bitches will re-classify revolvers as NFA.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WzHG-ibZaKM
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.