Posted on 12/07/2018 2:03:56 PM PST by grundle
When former first lady Michelle Obama’s strict limitations on school lunches went into effect, students across the country dumped the unappetizing offerings in the garbage, a debacle that cost taxpayers billions in wasted food and lunchroom sales.
Students, parents, administrators and lunch staff pleaded with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to roll back the restrictions – specific limits on everything from total calories to fat, sugar, sodium, and whole grain content – and the government created various waivers to allow schools to serve students food they will actually eat.
Now, the Trump administration is scrapping the unnecessary bureaucracy altogether by making many of the changes permanent, effectively erasing rules that some believe unfairly targeted minorities and ignored cultural diversity.
Diane Pratt-Heavner, spokeswoman for the School Nutrition Association representing local cafeteria workers, explained the situation to the Associated Press.
Pratt-Heavner “said whole-grain bread and buns generally aren’t a problem. But she said students complained about other items, in many cases because of cultural or regional preferences.
“Finding whole-grain biscuits and grits that students like are a challenge in the U.S. South, she said, while tortillas are a challenge in the Southwest,” the AP reports.
The SNA reports nearly 2 million fewer kids are eating school lunch each day since Obama-inspired rules took effect.
The recent changes mean schools no longer need a special waiver from the government for only whole grain breads, and cafeterias can now serve low-fat chocolate milk without Uncle Sam’s permission. Students could only get fat-free flavored milk under previous rules.
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue said Friday the changes, set to be published in a rule later this month, will also give schools more time to meet sodium aggressive sodium guidelines imposed by Obama, NPR reports.
The move is based on the obvious reality that healthy lunches don’t benefit kids if they won’t eat them.
“If kids are not eating what is being served, they are not benefiting, and food is being wasted,” Perdue said.
He seems to understand that parents are far more in tune with their children’s dietary needs than bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.
“We will listen to schools, and make common-sense changes as needed, to ensure they can meet the needs of their students based on their real-world experience in local communities,” Perdue said.
SNA President Gay Anderson applauded Perdue for seeing the big picture.
“School nutrition professionals have made tremendous progress in improving student diets, but the pace and degree of menu changes under updated nutrition standards were more than some students would accept,” Anderson said.
“We appreciate Secretary Perdue for finding solutions to address the concerns of schools and students,” he said. “This rule will entice more students to eat healthy school meals, which meet calorie limits and offer fruits, vegetables and milk.”
“Nutrition advocates,” meanwhile, are attacking President Trump for easing the Obama-era regulations, alleging a delay in sodium standards “will put kids’ health in jeopardy.”
“Parents will be disappointed when they learn that the meals served to their kids in school are under attack from President Trump’s de-regulatory agenda,” Margo Wootan, with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, said in a prepared statement. “This will mean that school lunches will fail to be consistent with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, as is required by law.”
A statement from the American Heart Association said “when it comes to our children’s health, there should be no ‘flexibility.’
“Failing to meet the science-based sodium standards for school meals originally adopted by USDA will put kids’ health in jeopardy,” the statement read.
NPR reports the daily sodium limit recommended by federal dietary guidelines is 2,300 mg, or just over 1,000 mg less than the average daily consumption of kids in the U.S.
Then why are they so darned FAT?!
If the students have to pay for lunch, why is anyone dictating what they an eat?
Yay!
The Lefties have been trying to take away everything that brings any comfort or joy, probably to try to make us all miserable and at each other’s throats. It’s good that chocolate milk is back, and Christmas too (sort of).
my my my....so one pompous woman sitting in Washington, D.C. really DOESN’T know best what 330 million Americans should eat. Color me shocked.
Yeah, the michelle obama starvation diet was very healthy.
“Failing to meet the science-based sodium standards for school meals originally adopted by USDA will put kids’ health in jeopardy,” the statement read.”
Oh noesssss, the school kids are all gonna die from eating hamburgers and macaroni and cheese for lunch! I always liked the fish on Fridays.
The Democrats will destroy the United States of America. Along with their friends in the Uniparty.
The chilruns better wake up to this cold, hard fact.
The cooks at my high school served “The Wednesday Special” which was chicken and noodles over mashed potatoes, yeast rolls made from scratch and usually green beans, and chocolate milk. Surprisingly enough, even though we put away a week’s worth of carbs in one convenient package, few of hte kids had weight problems. Of course after school there were sports, chores and if you got bored outdoor activities like riding bikes or ice skating. No internet.
The best solution of all would be to end government schools. Let the busybodies find some other way to meddle in our lives.
I remember the hot chocolate and cinnamon rolls so big and sticky, you had to use a fork to eat them. We had 50 kids in our class and our school had such breakfasts once a month. Those breakfasts gave the boys all the energy they needed to play energetic flag football during the two recesses. The lunch recess was the longest and the boys would come in with head to toe mud on them. Were there injuries? Not a bit. Was there a fat one among them? No.
The girls played skip rope, dodge ball and hop scotch. Were there injuries? Not a bit. Was there a fat one among them? No.
Today, the only ones getting their exercise are the lawyers as they walk through the halls of the court houses.
Finally, I ask if this is a strategy using the selection of the fittest to modify the human through genetics to the Western diet?
If we went back to the lunches from the ‘50’s and ‘60’s, we’d have HEALTHY, HAPPY kids running around the schools....
I don’t know how I survived all that “bad” food in the 1960’s and the 1970’s.
Perhaps because Michelle Obama is full of ........... lobster.
Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Yeah she eats caviar and drinks champagne for lunch
Yeah she eats caviar and drinks champagne for lunch
Kids don’t/aren’t allowed to get out play like we did as kids...
Cloverfarm hit it square...We didn’t have the internet...We actually played outside....
“I don’t know how I survived all that “bad” food in the 1960’s and the 1970’s.”
I grew up in the 30s and 40s.
We salted everything.
We buttered everything.
We sugared everything.
(Except during the wartime shortages,of course.)
.
.
Yep. Just visited one of my junior high schools a few months back.
DROVE from there back to the house my folks had at the time.
I made that walk a few times (a couple times after basketball practice - once in the snow).
It was a lot further than I had remembered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.