Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lab Severs Ties With James Watson, Citing ‘Unsubstantiated and Reckless’ Remarks
New York Times ^ | January 11, 2019 | Amy Harmon

Posted on 01/12/2019 5:23:13 AM PST by reaganaut1

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory revoked the honorary titles held by its longtime leader James D. Watson on Friday, describing as “unsubstantiated and reckless” his recent remarks about genetic differences in intelligence among racial groups.

Dr. Watson, one of the most influential scientists of the 20th century, had apologized after making similar comments to a British newspaper in 2007. At the time, he was forced to retire from his job as chancellor at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island, but he has retained his office there, as well as the titles of chancellor emeritus, Oliver R. Grace professor emeritus and honorary trustee. The graduate school of biological sciences at the research center is named for Dr. Watson, and the laboratory held a 90th birthday party for him last spring.

For the past decade the laboratory, like much of the scientific community, has engaged in a delicate balancing act with regard to Dr. Watson: holding him at arm’s length for reinforcing unfounded racial stereotypes, while still honoring him for his contributions to science. Dr. Watson, with Francis Crick and Rosalind Franklin, helped discover the double-helix structure of DNA in 1953, and he went on to help to shape the subsequent revolution in molecular biology.

But his recent comments “effectively reverse the written apology and retraction Dr. Watson made in 2007,” and “require the severing of any remaining vestiges of his involvement,” Cold Spring Harbor’s chief executive, Bruce Stillman, and its board of trustees chairwoman, Marilyn Simons, said in a statement.

[...] In the film, Dr. Watson references a view that average I.Q. differences between blacks and whites reflect underlying genetic differences shaped by natural selection.

But leading geneticists say that even modern DNA studies are currently unable to validate such hypotheses about differences between human populations.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bellcurve; helixmakemineadouble; iq; jameswatson; nazi; race
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: willk

“This is stupid. I am above average intelligence and I have known many blacks who are more intelligent than me.”

What does that have to do with averages, or a distribution around the average?


61 posted on 01/12/2019 7:26:08 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Never, ever apologize for saying something politically incorrect. It will only make you look weak and the Left won't forgive you, anyway.

Roger That !

62 posted on 01/12/2019 7:26:43 AM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

marchofdimes.com

NEWBORN SCREENING TESTS FOR YOUR BABY

KEY POINTS

All babies in the United States get newborn screening. Each state decides which tests are required.

Ask your baby’s health care provider which tests your baby will have.

If your baby has a newborn screening test result that’s not normal, he should have a different kind of test to make sure he’s healthy.

Newborn screening helps identify rare but serious health conditions. Many of these can be treated if found early.

What is newborn screening?
Before your baby leaves the hospital, he has some special tests called newborn screening. Newborn screening checks for serious but rare conditions that your baby has at birth. It includes blood, hearing and heart screening.

Your baby can be born with a health condition but may not show any signs of the problem at first. If a health condition is found early with newborn screening, it often can be treated. This makes it possible to avoid more serious health problems for your baby.

When is newborn screening done?
Your baby gets newborn screening before he leaves the hospital after birth, when he’s 1 to 2 days old. If your baby isn’t born in a hospital, talk to her provider about getting newborn screening at 1 to 2 days of age. Some states require that babies have newborn screening again about 2 weeks later.

How does newborn screening happen?
There are three parts to newborn screening:

Blood test. Most newborn screening is done with a blood test. A health care provider pricks your baby’s heel to get a few drops of blood. He collects the blood on a special paper and sends it to a lab within 1 day (24 hours) for testing. Your provider gets results for serious health conditions within 5 days and results for all conditions by 7 days. Following these timeframes is critical in case your baby has a disorder that needs to be identified and treated as early as possible. You can check with the hospital staff to make sure your baby’s sample was sent to the lab on time.
Hearing screening. For this test, your provider places a tiny, soft speaker in your baby’s ear to check how your baby responds to sound. Your baby gets this test before she leaves the hospital after birth.
Heart screening. This test is called pulse oximetry. It checks the amount of oxygen in your baby’s blood by using a sensor attached to his finger or foot. This test is used to screen babies for a group of heart conditions called critical congenital heart disease (CCHD). Your baby gets this test before he leaves the hospital after birth.
To find out more about the timeframes used for sending blood samples to lab and getting test results back, ask your baby’s provider or the hospital staff. Some states have websites with information about how well your hospital uses the timeframes. Check your state’s health department website to see if this information is available about your hospital.

What if newborn screening results aren’t normal?
Most newborn screening results are normal. In rare cases when your baby’s screening results aren’t normal, it may simply mean she needs more testing. Your baby’s provider then recommends another kind of test, called a diagnostic test, to see if there is a health problem. If the diagnostic test results are normal, no more testing is needed. If the diagnostic test results are not normal, your provider can guide you about next steps for your baby.

If one of your children has a health condition, will another have it, too?
Almost all of the health conditions found by newborn screening are inherited. This means they are passed from parents to children.

When one child in a family has an inherited health condition, the chance of a brother or sister having the same condition is higher than if no child in the family has the condition.

If you have a child with a health condition and you want to have another baby, talk to your health care provider or a genetic counselor. A genetic counselor is a person who is trained to know about genetics, birth defects and other medical problems that run in families.

Sometimes hearing loss is not inherited. For example, it can be caused by an infection during pregnancy. In this case, it usually doesn’t happen in another pregnancy.

What kinds of health conditions does newborn screening test for?
Each state requires different tests, so ask your baby’s health care provider which tests your baby will have. You also can visit babysfirsttest.org to find out what conditions your state tests for.

The March of Dimes would like to see all babies in all states screened for at least 34 health conditions. Many of these health conditions can be treated if found early. The health conditions are divided into seven groups:

1. Organic acid metabolism disorders. Babies with these problems don’t metabolize food correctly. Metabolism is the way your body changes food into the energy it needs to breathe, digest and grow.

Isovaleric acidemia (IVA)
Glutaric acidemia (GAI)
Hydroxymethylglutaric aciduria, also called 3-OH 3-CH3 glutaric aciduria (HMG)
Multiple carboxylase deficiency (MCD)
Methylmalonic acidemia, mutase deficiency (MUT)
3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3MCC)
Methylmalonic acidemia, CBl A and CBl B forms
Propionic acidemia (PROP)
Beta-ketothiolase deficiency (BKT)
2. Fatty acid oxidation disorders. When your body runs out of sugar, it usually breaks down fat for energy. A baby with fatty acid oxidation problems can’t change fat into energy.

Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD)
Very long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (VLCAD)
Long-chain hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (LCHAD)
Trifunctional protein deficiency (TFP) Carnitine uptake defect (CUD)
3. Amino acid metabolism disorders. Babies with these problems can’t process amino acids in the body. Amino acids help the body make protein.

Phenylketonuria (PKU)
Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD)
Homocystinuria (HCY)
Citrullinemia (CIT)
Argininosuccinic acidemia (ASA)
Tyrosinemia type I (TYR I)
4. Hemoglobin disorders. These problems affect red blood cells. Red blood cells carry oxygen to the rest of the body.

Sickle cell anemia
Hb S/beta-thalassemia (Hb S/Th)
Hb S/C disease (Hb S/C)
5. Lysosomal storage disorders. Babies with these problems can’t break down certain types of complex sugars. This causes harmful substances to build up in the body.

Mucopolysaccharidosis Type-1 (MPS 1)
Pompe disease
6. Adrenal gland disorders. These problems affect the adrenal glands, which sit on top of the kidneys and help the body make hormones.

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH)
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD)
7. Other disorders

Congenital hypothyroidism (HYPOTH)
Biotinidase deficiency (BIO)
Galactosemia (GALT)
Hearing loss (HEAR)
Cystic fibrosis (CF)
Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)
Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD)
More information
Newborn screening: Blood screen infographic
Newborn screening: Hearing screen infographic
Newborn screening: Heart screen infographic
NewSTEPs
National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center
Baby’s First Test
See also: Birth defects, Newborn care in the delivery room

Last reviewed: February, 2016

@ 2018 March of Dimes, a not-for-profit, section 501c(3).
Privacy, Terms, and Notices


63 posted on 01/12/2019 7:26:46 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory revoked the honorary titles held by its longtime leader James D. Watson on Friday, describing as “unsubstantiated and reckless” his recent remarks about genetic differences in intelligence among racial groups.”

Dr. Watson’s comments conclusions are backed up by a large number of scientific tests that have been reproduced by many different scientists over many decades. The test methods have been altered to address concerns about language, cultural and socioeconomic biases and little if any effects have been found. To my knowledge the results are always essentially the same. There is a significant racial difference in average IQ. If Dr. Watson’s claims are “unsubstantiated” I would like to see the data CSHL is using to claim that there are no racial IQ differences.


64 posted on 01/12/2019 7:28:49 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (The first step in ending the war on white people is to recognize it exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

There is a fine line between genetic and cultural.

Take a look at the Blacks. They have been culturally conditioned to a predisposition towards helpless victimhood.

Any Black attempting to better himself/herself, by education and responsible behavior, is “punished” by the Black “Victims” for being “White”.

It takes real courage to refuse to be kept down on the socialist plantation. Those who rise above, should be respected.


65 posted on 01/12/2019 7:30:12 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Disarming Liberals...Real Common Sense Gun Control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Nothing. It’s non sequitur virtue signalling.


66 posted on 01/12/2019 7:31:34 AM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Dr Thomas Sowell has written some interesting pieces on the subject that cover it pretty well.


67 posted on 01/12/2019 7:31:41 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
But leading geneticists say that even modern DNA studies are currently unable to validate such hypotheses about differences between human populations.

That's because they do not want to.

Interesting how scientists can rank the intelligence of dog breeds, cat breeds, birds breeds, and other animal breeds within a species, but they can't -- or are unwilling -- to recognize differences in intelligence among human breeds.

68 posted on 01/12/2019 7:39:04 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ
Our position needs to be that, even if such differences were real, everyone should be equal under the law, and that nobody’s achievement has to be limited by a group statistic,..but such achievement should be obtained by objective merit.
69 posted on 01/12/2019 7:51:35 AM PST by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BRL

These brilliant scientists believe that genetics is important in growing corn, horse breeding, cholesterol level and physical characteristics but have no affect on intelligence?


70 posted on 01/12/2019 7:52:44 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

Funny thing about all these godless scientists who only are led by reason and logic.... They aren’t and they are too arrogant to see themselves as slaves to a religion, albeit not the Christian one. They are slave to a far more fickle religion, but they do not publicly challenge it.


71 posted on 01/12/2019 8:00:45 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

The left argues that we need to accept homosexuals because they are “born that way” but, in the next breath they say that one can choose your gender. That’s the hypocrisy gene that I pose would be 100% homozygous.

Frankly, I don’t care. I don’t think what individuals choose to do is my concern if they are not harming others.

I do get bothered that they expect me to, “bake their cakes” or rent them rooms or pay for their medical procedures. Them choose for themselves but I don’t get to say, I am not accepting of your choices and don’t want it forced on me. I don’t want to be supportive of lots of people insofar as they are making life choices I prefer to avoid. Drug addicts, lazy slobs, sexually permissive people(heterosexuals included) criminals... I try to avoid certain folks behaving in ways that I don’t want to accept in my life. It is possible they may find genes to show these are innate characteristics in time.

As to this article, I accept good people of any flavor.


72 posted on 01/12/2019 8:37:40 AM PST by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

A mind is like any other muscle. If not exercised and fed properly it is worthless.


73 posted on 01/12/2019 8:39:51 AM PST by oldasrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
so i guess that's why the entire consonant of africa was smart enough to know they didn't need to invent the wheel...

or maybe because they knew some other race would invent it for them?

74 posted on 01/12/2019 8:48:53 AM PST by Chode ( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

It’s the leftist science denies at work again. The Political Commissars forcing people to engage in self-criticism, and apologize for having an incorrect thought or idea.

In other words, The Truth Hurts, so we can’t say what is true, only what is approved by the Political Commissars.


75 posted on 01/12/2019 9:34:30 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

“Yes,we are all equal in God’s eyes...but not exactly the same.”

Let me repeat that....

Yes,we are all equal in God’s eyes...but not exactly the same.

EXCELLENT!


76 posted on 01/12/2019 10:04:23 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

You can’t touch this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

M.C. Hammer.


77 posted on 01/12/2019 10:08:22 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

She was a little wrong. Whites and Asians dominate the top tiers in terms of grades at Harvard and other places, though Jews do have a heavy disproportion in getting admitted.


78 posted on 01/12/2019 10:14:30 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

You have not explored the issue. You need to.


79 posted on 01/12/2019 10:18:01 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: _Jim

“Mankind’s problems, at their heart, are moral and spiritual.

These two things drive culture.

And politics then is downstream from culture ...”

Nothing but net!


80 posted on 01/12/2019 10:20:23 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Socialism is for losers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson