Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shooter in Aurora, Illinois, manufacturing plant wasn't legally allowed to own gun
NBC News ^ | 2-16-2019 | Kalman Rosenblatt

Posted on 02/16/2019 10:46:53 AM PST by tcrlaf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: PROCON

So he couldn’t “legally” own a gun. So fine him!


41 posted on 02/16/2019 12:17:34 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Amazing when a bad law bites you in the butt...


42 posted on 02/16/2019 12:32:14 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

And the “good” news is, even though the perp is dead, he will still vote at least several times in 2020. He might even vote more dead than he ever did when he was alive!


43 posted on 02/16/2019 12:33:42 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

I’m assuming that the warehouse had a NO FIREARMS policy.

Foolish.


44 posted on 02/16/2019 12:33:42 PM PST by old-ager (anti-new-ager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Still scratchin my head.
Illinois FOID background check goes through the fed NICS.
He wasn’t caught there.

Assuming he bought the gun from an FFL dealer, they also do a background check thru NICS.
He wasn’t caught there.

The Concealed Carry background check also goes thru the NICS. Fingerprints are optional.
(background check takes longer without them)he did give finger prints and he was caught, again the check was NICS.

The only difference in the background check is the finger print.
Is his name in NICS database different ? or spelled wrong ? or an alias ?

State Police might or might not have screwed the pooch, here.
The question is, are the State Police suppose to go get the weapons ?


45 posted on 02/16/2019 12:36:15 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

The killer ignored the “no guns” sign. The nerve of him! Didn’t he know he could have been in big trouble if he was caught with a gun?


46 posted on 02/16/2019 12:36:49 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

You are probably from Il, and I am not disputing what you say. But I thought the NICS check was Federal law.


47 posted on 02/16/2019 12:47:54 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ikeon

I have to admit that was a thought as well. HR has nothing to do with humans or resources.

I’ve never had an HR person who did anything but muck up the works.


48 posted on 02/16/2019 12:50:47 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Like Catburt, Evil HR Director said, “You can’t spell “Who Cares?” without “HR”.


49 posted on 02/16/2019 12:52:43 PM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Magnum44; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale

In my view, 2A applies to everyone so unless dude is on probation I don’t see how it’s proper to violate his rights no matter what he did in the past. If he’s a violent psycho he should be dead or still in prison. I suppose you could do lifetime probation or something, but again my preference is the person who would need lifetime probation and is so horrible that him having a pistol is something that can’t be contemplated, shouldn’t be free/alive. As we see the prohibition of gun ownership is meaningless anyway since that sort of person can and will obtain a fireman illegally.

Voting should be a privilege. I support banning felons from voting for the simple reason the majority of them would rat. I don’t care whether that’s fair or not, we are at war with the left and must use all tools at our disposal. My deepest condolences to decent people with tax evasion convictions who can’t vote. If we can selectively ban rat demographic type crimes only, great.


50 posted on 02/16/2019 1:06:50 PM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

States are responsible for the background check done when selling a gun. NICS is the standard resource to do that. Many states, including my own, allow an existing state firearms license or CCW permit to take the place of the NICS check.


51 posted on 02/16/2019 1:13:05 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

You would be correct.


52 posted on 02/16/2019 1:15:00 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Well, in my idea of a civilized society, this cretin had already provided ample evidence he shouldn’t be allowed to live among us. And ultimately, he proved that judgment to be correct.


53 posted on 02/16/2019 1:16:09 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach, said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
You are probably from Il, and I am not disputing what you say. But I thought the NICS check was Federal law.

I am from Michigan, not Ill, but in several states, including Michigan, if a person possesses a concealed carry permit or state issued FOID, they are not required to go through a NICS check when purchasing. We still have to fill out a form 4473, but do not need the NICS phone call.

The past four guns I purchased I only flashed my CPL to the FFL, and he recorded that information on the 4473 in lieu of a NICS approval number. (Line 21 on form 4473)

54 posted on 02/16/2019 1:24:04 PM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Illinois doesn’t enforce gun laws against known felons.


55 posted on 02/16/2019 1:28:43 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

A dozen new gun laws wouldn’t have changed that.


56 posted on 02/16/2019 1:37:50 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo; Vermont Lt; ButThreeLeftsDo

According to Illinois statutes, State Police are required to check NICS database for both the FOID and gun purchase back ground checks.

http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1657&ChapAct=430%26nbsp%3BILCS%26nbsp%3B65%2F&ChapterID=39&ChapterName=PUBLIC%2BSAFETY&ActName=Firearm%2BOwners%2BIdentification%2BCard%2BAct.

do a search on “national instant”

FreeRegards.


57 posted on 02/16/2019 2:03:40 PM PST by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Very sad. I sold these folks parts back in the day.

Glad the shooter is dead. Prayers up for the victims.

L


58 posted on 02/16/2019 2:17:48 PM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
If a white guy in a red cap had done the shooting, the cables and networks would be all over this heinous crime every hour, every day....in every way. But as soon as the perp was identified as a person of color....the crime suddenly began to get only slight, random notice from the MSM. In a day or two, this mass carnage will be relegated to the dust-bin of history.....except for those in the enemdia hell-bent on tying this all to Trump.

WELL SAID!

59 posted on 02/16/2019 4:47:48 PM PST by entropy12 (Legal immigrants under chain migration not any better than illegal immigrants! Merit ONLY!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

What? A criminal that didn’t obey gun laws? Whodathunk?


60 posted on 02/16/2019 4:49:24 PM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson