Posted on 05/08/2019 2:41:01 PM PDT by billorites
Trump has done things the GOP never, ever would do. He does not always win, but man, what a breath of fresh air he is.
The decision should only be good for their jurisdiction.
Excellent!
To get our country working again, we need to not only “Drain the Swamp” at Congress and in key federal agencies (the Snake Dept, security, defense, intelligence, policy)...
we need to get rid of (or get a good leash, rein on) those occupants of the judiciary who consider themselves dictators instead of proper judges.
They are very very very dangerous
long overdue
It is about time! Gotta get those black-robed mullahs back into their cages and lock the doors...
Long overdue.
Courts of Appeals There are 13 appellate courts that sit below the U.S. Supreme Court, and they are called the U.S. Courts of Appeals. The 94 federal judicial districts are organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has a court of appeals. The appellate court’s task is to determine whether or not the law was applied correctly in the trial court. Appeals courts consist of three judges and do not use a jury. A court of appeals hears challenges to district court decisions from courts located within its circuit, as well as appeals from decisions of federal administrative agencies.
It’s about time.
In the Southern District of Ohio, Judge Susan Dlott sits as a District Judge. She is a fat lazy lawyer who is a dead ringer for Joy Behar. Her crooked husband, gave Clinton a bunch of money he stole from his clients before he was disbarred and Clinton appointed her to the judgeship. She brings her huge poorly trained dogs into the Courthouse despite prohibition and holds court with her cronies.
She would issue any injunction the Demorats put in front of her.
I have a better solution but it probably isn’t legal. Moral maybe, just probably but not legal.
The courts are out of control.
Terrific. I love it. I would go a step further and not allow Federal District Court judges to order any injunctions vs the government. Puts too much power in the hands of a single judge and allows for forum shopping for liberal nutjob judges in California. I would require that actions for injunctions vs the government be commenced at the multi judge appellate level.
“the Trump administration will challenge the ability of federal district court judges to issue nation-wide injunctions.”
*Hawaii judge disqualifies Trump administration challenge to nation-wide injunctions.*
This is a wise judicial maneuver, since Obama judges have been controlling the mood of American justice by issuing mandates that temporarily are controlling the directions of this country. The Constitution did not mean for it to go this way. The Founding Fathers figured that our judges today would have less moral turpitude than that. They figured that by now, people would be more decent than that.
What took ‘em so long? The ability of one unelected person to control the entire United States is completely insane!
Praise be to God (YHVH)!
Courts must function according to their authority. Obviously they have no authority to cancel national activities of the executive branch.
Jail for judges! Who act outside of lawful authority or make ruling based on anything but legislated law. Hard prison time.
“Trump officials to challenge authority of judges to issue national injunctions”
Relying on courts to police themselves is stupid. The proper way to reign in fascist judges is impeachment of judges by Congress. But guess what - our gutless congress refuses to do its constitutional duty.
That means that the only way open to reign in fascist judges is death squads, kinda like South America.
No wonder we’re heading for a Civil War II.
This is about damned time!!!
No more of some obscure judge in SF or Arkansas declaring himself superior to the President or even Congress!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.