Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal appeals court rules 'bikini baristas' may have to wear more clothes
The Hill ^ | 07/06/19 | John Bowden

Posted on 07/06/2019 7:54:15 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

A group of Seattle-area baristas who argued in court that they should not be restricted from serving drinks in bikinis and other revealing clothing may have to cover up ⁠— at least for now.

CNN reported Saturday that a federal appeals court ruled that women at an Everett, Wash., drive-thru coffee stand may have to cover up.

The ruling, made by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, vacated U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman's 2017 decision that placed an injunction on a city ordinance requiring "quick-service facility" workers to wear, at minimum, shorts and a tank top.

Another 2017 city ordinance broadened the city's definition of "lewd" conduct to include public displays of certain body parts. The owner of Hillbilly Hotties, one such drive-thru coffee stand, sued over the city ordinances, claiming they violated baristas' First and 14th Amendment rights.

The ordinances will now go into effect as the decision is sent back down to a lower court.

"The panel concluded that the vagueness doctrine did not warrant an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the Dress Code Ordinance," Wednesday's ruling stated, according to CNN. "The panel concluded that the mode of dress at issue in this case was not sufficiently communicative to merit First Amendment protection."

City officials in Everett praised the court's ruling, claiming that authorities had provided "extensive evidence of adverse secondary effects associated with the stands, including prostitution and sexual violence."

"The city looks forward to enforcing its ordinances consistent with the Court's decision and in the best interest of the community," Everett city officials told CNN.

According to CNN, a city police investigation found that some baristas engaged in lewd conduct, while some were victimized by patrons. Police detailed that other crimes were associated with the stands, according to the ruling.

An attorney for the women told the news network that they will continue to battle the ordinance.

"The baristas are seeking to exercise their right to choose their work clothing," the attorney said. "The baristas sought to express positive messages of body confidence and female empowerment. This decision effectively tells women that the female body must be covered up and hidden, and that women must be protected from themselves."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: baristas; clownbammyjudge; federalistsociety; judiciary; rapinbilljudge; seattle; smirkingchimpjudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
If you're going to compete with Starbucks on their home ground you need a gimmick to stand out.
1 posted on 07/06/2019 7:54:15 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

While I’m no fan of “strip joints” and such, the fact that we allow strip joints and Hooters, makes me wonder, how is a bikini barista place fundamentally different than other places which have females on display? Legally speaking I mean?


2 posted on 07/06/2019 7:59:05 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Library sessions with trannies & kids — ok

Skimpily-dressed baristas - not ok


3 posted on 07/06/2019 7:59:35 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

4 posted on 07/06/2019 7:59:51 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“A group of Seattle-area baristas who argued in court that they should not be restricted from serving drinks in bikinis and other revealing clothing may have to cover up.

I agree. Forcing them to wear more clothes would be an abrogation of free speech and expression.


5 posted on 07/06/2019 8:02:26 AM PDT by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Umm...pics?!?!


6 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:04 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
Anybody else think this thread is worthless without pics?

How can we do our research?


7 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:15 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This thread is useless without pictures! :^)


8 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:26 AM PDT by nevergore (I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I think we’re gonna need evidence. You know, to make an informed decision...


9 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:35 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Tearing down Confederate statue - Free Speech

Wearing mask at violent riot - Free Speech

Halter top while serving coffee - NOT free speech


10 posted on 07/06/2019 8:06:42 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bagster; All

Great post in a great thread. Thanks. (still laughing)


11 posted on 07/06/2019 8:07:00 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The obvious answer is political messages written on bare skin.

I would love to see the Supremes get a case where a comely woman has written “Joe Biden is a Boob” on herself.


12 posted on 07/06/2019 8:07:10 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Bikinis are sexist weapons of the patriarchy and should be banned, but naked, erect homos marching in a “pride” parade is enriching diverse culture and just fine.

Oh how I despise the left.


13 posted on 07/06/2019 8:08:02 AM PDT by bk1000 (I stand with Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore

14 posted on 07/06/2019 8:08:03 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

15 posted on 07/06/2019 8:09:11 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

16 posted on 07/06/2019 8:10:38 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Thank you, and go Raiders!


17 posted on 07/06/2019 8:11:34 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Go here for the original story and some disappointing video:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/05/us/bikini-baristas-ruling/index.html


18 posted on 07/06/2019 8:12:02 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Does the business gets higher prices for a normal product for adding erotocism? Then the sell of lewdness is occurring with the other product. There is a call to REPENT and be saved.


19 posted on 07/06/2019 8:13:01 AM PDT by KDF48 (Redeemed by Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Sounds like Starbucks going after competition.

We have a food joint around here where the waitress wear bikinis and chaps. I am sure some prudes around here would love to get rid of the place. Hope not, they have good food.


20 posted on 07/06/2019 8:13:28 AM PDT by Dawggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson