Posted on 10/21/2019 8:59:53 AM PDT by conservative98
I’ve probably got a number of years on you, and have closely watched politics for over 30 years, and likely witnessed every type of political lie there is, which is why I know not to trust the liar.
++++
Is that you Mark? Me thinks thou doest protest too much.
Give it up, there are an awful lot of us who see right through your shenanigans.
I believe Barron is still just 13. His Twitter handle is @BarronTrumpOrg and it seems legit. Though you never know these days.
Sorry old timer.
Dont sweat small things like Talk Shows so much.
Dont waste your time hating Mark Levin. He is doing more than you could ever dream to get Trump re-elected,
re: “_Jim, with Trump the only guy running against Hillary Clinton, this is the best you could do?”
You’re being maximally stupid now.
You SEEM to have forgotten about a REPUBLICAN PRIMARY.
Have you had a sanity/ competency/ perceptual test anytime in the last few years?
Is it a memory thing with you otherwise?
I see Levin the same way I do Cruz.
Both of them spend time on their knees praying Trump does something, anything, so they can blurt out, “See, I tried to tell you.”
It’s called exoneration, and they’re desperate.
I addressed the time after Trump had the delegates until September 6th and beyond here.
Do try not to embarrass yourself.
You needed Mark to vet Trump up until September 6th?
You don’t think it was overkill him spewing negative on Trump until into September?
This was just everyday vetting to you?
LMAO.
_Jim, you’re as stupid now as the last time you and I ran into each other.
When someone has the nomination, you back off. You forget about the time when you were truly vetting the guy. You fall in behind them if they are anything near decent, and back them.
Mark took an additional three months to decide whether Trump or Hillary deserved his vote.
That doesn’t seem odd to you does it. LMAO
He was viciously going after Trump when Trump was the only person left against Hillary.
Go ahead and defend that.
Show people what your true colors are.
No problem, I should’ve been more clear.
re: “You needed Mark to vet Trump up until September 6th?”
You’re still not getting it.
MARK needed to vet Trump. Him, Mark. His mind and HIS thought processes. Forget about me - Mark does not communicate with me!
This is really quite simple, BUT, you WANT to make it HARD.
I Agree that its simple.
You get to vet up until he has the delegates.
Hes fair game until then. However if you still trash him for three more months, that calls all the vetting into question. It reveals you dont like the guy, cant accept he got the nomination, and you want to do harm to his chances of being elected.
When you do that, it calms all your criticism into question.
Mark went way over the line in 2016.
Very simple...
He better.
In 2016 he did far more than I did to help get Hillary! elected.
True, but he is limiting his potential on into the future.
Nixon was able to make course corrections, come back, and win the presidency. Mitt is destroying his chances of that realization for him.
So while he has found a place that will fall for his carpet bag routine, he’s toast elsewhere.
He’s seen for exactly what you observed. He is the new McCain. He will backbite his own party members expressing extremely flawed logic. He will destroy any further chances he will have in politics.
Nah, that isn’t political savvy.
He is unpopular with the Left and the Right.
About all Mitt has done at his age, is find a way to alienate people.
Most people at his age have settled into a grove that defends certain values, and attracts other like minded people.
Where is Mitt’s broader appeal. It’s vaporware.
Even the media darlings that use him wouldn’t dream of voting for him.
Yes, but I don’t see it as an example of political savvy.
Political savvy must be evidenced by some sort of growth, improvement, or increased clout.
Who takes Mitt seriously? The Left? The Right? Even he media?
The media uses him and laughs at him. The other two groups despise him.
So Mitch has found his nitch alright. He has a job for life, we pretty much agree there. Beyond that, he’s just kidding himself.
His vote will be over-ridden. His views will be ignored or despised.
He will be planted with pomp and circumstance, while the nation at large turns their back on him.
Contrast that will Reagan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.