Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key juror questioned in Roger Stone case
The Hill ^ | 02 25 2020 | Harper Neidig and John Kruzel

Posted on 02/25/2020 4:27:17 PM PST by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
My prediction: 'While her answers may appear to be misleading, I can find no intent'.
1 posted on 02/25/2020 4:27:17 PM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

This judge will not budge an inch!!!


2 posted on 02/25/2020 4:29:34 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Well, I mean, if she can’t remember it.. /s


3 posted on 02/25/2020 4:30:25 PM PST by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Of course, she didn’t only tweet about Trump, she celebrated Stone’s arrest. So... that seems to me like bias. And if she denied it at the time (and seems to still deny it) is there a case for perjury? Disbarment, since she is an attorney?


4 posted on 02/25/2020 4:32:24 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

I’ve got murder in my heart for the judge
I’ve got murder in my heart for the judge
Well, that bad old judge wouldn’t budge
I’ve got murder in my heart for the judge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xEbbyKJ0mk


5 posted on 02/25/2020 4:32:58 PM PST by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

You’ve learned well Grasshopper.


6 posted on 02/25/2020 4:33:07 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

She investigated and found nothing. Case closed. 😒
7 posted on 02/25/2020 4:33:09 PM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Lib judges don’t judge. They already “know”. Should this ignorant s**t be doxed, I most certainly will not judge the doxers. After all, libs do it all the time.


8 posted on 02/25/2020 4:33:25 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Oh yeah, this is real helpful. Cause liars quickly become honest when confronted by soft shell questioning by a fellow believer.


9 posted on 02/25/2020 4:34:13 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I’m not hopeful for Stone. But I will give the judge a friendly suggestion. “You got to know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em, know when to walk away, and know when to run.” In the present case, gracefully fold and walk away.


10 posted on 02/25/2020 4:35:45 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The Hillary Clinton Defense. : “ I do not recall “ ( used 21/ 25 times during email server testimony)


11 posted on 02/25/2020 4:36:24 PM PST by griswold3 (Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Been a LONG time since I’ve heard that one.


12 posted on 02/25/2020 4:36:47 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lastchance

What f’n joke.
Did you unfairly influence? Well no. Okay we’re good.


13 posted on 02/25/2020 4:36:56 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I don’t care what she says.

What does the evidence say?


14 posted on 02/25/2020 4:37:18 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Yes, just like Hillary would couldn’t remember so many times. The Judge and the Jury foreperson are aligned in their hostility to Trump and anyone associated with him. It may not have started out as a conspiracy, but it is starting to smell like one.


15 posted on 02/25/2020 4:38:31 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
BEHIND CLOSED DOORS!!! NO STONE LAWYER WAS PRESENT!!

AMY BERMAN JACKASS IS A DIRTY DEMOCRAT!!!

16 posted on 02/25/2020 4:38:40 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Exactly.


17 posted on 02/25/2020 4:40:55 PM PST by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Stone's attorney argued that
(A) Hart’s lack of candor misled the defense team;
(B) her opposition to Trump was evidence of bias against Stone, and,
(C) alleged that Hart misled the court during jury selection when asked about her social media activity and political beliefs.

“She concealed evidence regarding her political views which would have been important for the court and the parties for understanding her bias,” Ginsberg said in Tuesday’s hearing. “Based on the social media posts, it appears to me that [her answers] are misleading — intentionally,” he added.

==============================================

<><> After Hart’s role as the Stone jury foreperson became publicly known, several of her social media posts criticizing Trump were uncovered.

<><> Judge Jackson, an Obama appointee, also brought in two other jurors, both of whom said that Hart did not try to prejudice the panel and did not appear biased. Neither one was identified during the questioning. “I never had any feeling that she was attempting anything like that,” one of the jurors told the judge. Another juror said that the foreperson even slowed down deliberations so that the jury could more carefully consider one of the charges.

<><> Judge Jackson said the testimony showed that there was little evidence that Hart had acted improperly on the jury and added that Hart’s political beliefs would not be grounds for a new trial. “Posts about the president do not constitute bias against the defendant,” Jackson said. “Having an opinion about the president on some or all of his policies does not mean she can not fairly judge evidence against Roger Stone.”

18 posted on 02/25/2020 4:44:52 PM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Sadly, I went to the comments after the article. There is real hatred for anyone who might support Trump, by the readers of The Hill. The comments are overall disgusting.


19 posted on 02/25/2020 4:46:14 PM PST by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

“Another juror said that the foreperson even slowed down deliberations so that the jury could more carefully consider one of the charges.

Jackson said the testimony showed that there was little evidence that Hart had acted improperly on the jury and added that Hart’s political beliefs would not be grounds for a new trial.”

Based on these two paragraphs I am really worried that the Judge will not rule for Stone. Sad. Really sad.


20 posted on 02/25/2020 4:47:23 PM PST by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson