Posted on 04/08/2020 5:56:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
Its often said that most of what the academic elites call philosophy is nothing but some underutilized minds worrying themselves about questions that common-sense folk find obvious. The saying came to mind as I listened recently to some of these folks straining to fit their various theories to the Age of Trump. More precisely, they were double-helixing themselves trying to explain why the amoral, relativist, truth-denying theories theyve championed for so long are actually good reasons for hating the supposedly amoral, relativist, truth-defying current President.
Listening to this theorizing crystallized (at least for this initially reluctant Trump supporter) why President Trump is indispensable.
One of the philosophical exchanges concerned the allegedly inscrutable problem of the self, of explaining how we can say a human being remains the same person over time even though ones physical cells are all lost and replaced many times throughout life. Yes, this actually can pose a conundrum, if you reject out of hand the existence of all supernatural entities including the soul and God, as the elites generally do.
This problem of the self raises moral issues. If you dont know when a persons selfhood begins or ends, how can you judge whether that person is moral or immoral? Sure, they say, Hitler slaughtered six million or so human beings, but wasnt he also an animal lover who practiced vegetarianism and was kind to his pets?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
The Golden Rule is : He who has the gold makes the rules.
Certainly most cultures have moral provisions for fighting outsiders, but given that Christian societies have also found moral provisions for battles and crusades, I dont think youre making any case that belief in a Supreme Being is the genesis of the social contract.
The left is fundamentally evil.
Let us not forget that Hitler rose to power in a Christian nation, complete with vast cheering crowds. The vast majority of the people got behind Hitler until their fortunes changed on the eastern front.
you said -
Certainly most cultures have moral provisions for fighting outsiders, but given that Christian societies have also found moral provisions for battles and crusades, I dont think youre making any case that belief in a Supreme Being is the genesis of the social contract.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
I think you are something of a “philosopher” and this applies to YOU:
Its often said that most of what the academic elites call philosophy is nothing but some underutilized minds worrying themselves about questions that common-sense folk find obvious.
+ + + + + + + +
You seem to be picking quibbles based on your own interpretation of historical events. But that is one of the great things about FR.
bump for later
I’m not quibbling about anything. I’m saying that the notion that the level of cooperation necessary to group survival can be based on assessing how you want to be treated and assuming that’s probably how others want to be treated as well... is not some incredible breakthrough that no one thought of till Jesus.
One person with strong anti-Nazi and anti-Hitler sentiments will surprise you: Admiral Canaris, head of German military intelligence. He tried to leak information to the Allies, but they never acted on any of that material because it was obvious that it came from the highest levels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.