W.H.O. Claims ‘No Evidence’ Antibodies Will Stop COVID Re-Infections, Pushes for Widespread Vaccination Campaign

The World Health Organization (WHO) is claiming that there is “no evidence” that natural antibodies can protect individuals from coronavirus, setting the stage for a widespread vaccination push as the only solution to the pandemic.

WHO leaders are telling governments across the world not to rely on tests that indicate whether or not an individual has contracted coronavirus at some point because they believe theses people could be reinfected even after they had the virus previously.

“Nobody is sure whether someone with antibodies is fully protected against having the disease or being exposed again,” said Mike Ryan, the executive director of WHO’s emergencies program.

Over three million serology tests have been purchased by the British government to measure antibodies in blood plasma, but WHO leaders are casting serious doubt on this strategy to contain the coronavirus pandemic. These sort of tests are similar to blood-prick tests that have been widely used to instantly determine if a person has HIV.

The WHO is making this determination after Silvio Brusaferro, the health institute chief in Italy, reported that only ten percent of Italians have developed immunity, according to his research. This is expected to put a death blow to an immunity passport plan that has been championed by the likes of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Although that Orwellian scheme has seemingly been defeated, WHO will be using the pandemic to push vaccines as the only way to ensure that the pandemic is eradicated. They are coordinating scientists and researchers on a frenzied push to develop a vaccine that can be synthesized and distributed across the world.

WHO’s leadership has totally discredited WHO.

They are no more “expert” on any subject in their mission than tons of better experts all over the world. There is no logical or rationale reason to think they of all organizations know better than everyone else.

They could regain some stature, if their whole organization was changed. They would have to no longer be comprise of a staff of their own set of experts. They would have to no longer be independent of their member organizations. Their committees would not be WHO employees. They be representatives of the CDC type agencies in their member countries. All pronouncements of the WHO would be only by consensus of those representatives. ALL WHO activities around the world would only be by consensus of those representatives and those activities would be coordinating contributing activities agreed on by consensus of the member states, not independent WHO activities.

Instead of WHO sitting on top of all its members, it would only carry out that which its members agree to by consensus and any WHO opinions would be a consensus opinion from the opinions contributed, not internally by WHO itself, but from its members.

Worth repeating:
This confirms that China wants the West to remain under lockdown to hurt our economies. The WHO is a mouthpiece of the Chinese communists.

Bring Out Your Dead

Post to me or FReep mail to be on/off the Bring Out Your Dead ping list.

The purpose of the “Bring Out Your Dead” ping list (formerly the “Ebola” ping list) is very early warning of emerging pandemics, as such it has a high false positive rate.

The false positive rate was 100%.

At some point we may well have a high mortality pandemic, and likely as not the “Bring Out Your Dead” threads will miss the beginning entirely.

*sigh* Such is life, and death...

If a quarantine saves just one child's or one old fart’s life, it's worth it.

At another FR thread we were discussing various Covid issues and I wondered what we could learn from Ebola virus issues. To my SPECIFIC question at Google on use of high Vitamin C for Ebola, the link below was the first link provided. There were others that referred to C, but this was first and I am listing it because of it’s references to WHO and prevailing attitudes toward all nutrition interventions. My own thought was that Ebola symptoms sounded like acute rampant Scurvy and would profit from very high C.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6924885/ “Despite the initially large number of papers with the key search term “nutrition” related to EVD case management, few explicitly described the details of the delivered nutritional support. Most clinical management papers delineated supportive care for dehydration and electrolytes through oral rehydration solutions (ORS) or intravenous fluid administration and did not refer to nutrition.”
“Perception of Nutrition Response - One descriptive qualitative study of key informants analyzed community perceptions of the nutrition-related response in Guinea (21). That study had 2 main objectives: the first was to determine how the Ebola outbreak affected infant and child nutrition on a community level, and the second was to gauge stakeholders’ perception on the acceptability and effectiveness of the nutrition response, including the WHO/UNICEF/WFP 2014 interim guidelines for nutritional care. A consistent theme across informants was the lack of emphasis on nutrition by health professionals and community members during the Ebola outbreak. Key informants also noted limitations around the use of the WHO/UNICEF/WFP interim guidelines; some informants were unaware of the guidelines or questioned their usefulness, and some reported finding the guidelines useful but difficult to implement. The authors recommended that nutrition be a core component of response and integrated into all aspects of care, treatment, and recovery.”
My takeaway from reading this is that WHO is going through the motions and has no real interest in improving the life of Africans. So who is formulating this negligent and shameful attitude—drug companies?? “WHO recommends that EVD patients should be provided with a minimum recommended daily allowance (RDA) of nutrients through normal traditional or fortified foods (1,16) or micronutrient powders (28). It also states that, until further evidence is available, excess use of any micronutrient for EVD patients is not recommended, unless correcting for a specific micronutrient loss (e.g., treating hypokalemia). However, in many EVD-affected countries in sub-Saharan Africa, malnutrition, including micronutrient deficiencies, is widely prevalent (29,30), and 1 RDA of, for example, vitamins would not sufficiently address existing suboptimal levels in EVD patients.” MINIMUM RDA—for shame!!

"WHO is going through the motions"

That's probably giving them too much credit.

In all my life, my sense of mankind is that in groups that are not explicitly directed and incentivized to success (like, say, corporations to make products that must be of a certain quality to sell ... or purely voluntary and free associations of men around some common purpose like religion or sports) ... all other groups of men descend into corruption or at best veer towards it.

Man's natural God given interest is in both himself and preservation of the group WHEN preservation of the group is important to his own desires for joy or survival.

The WHO is none of those things. Therefore it is just power given to a group, and that group as a rule, will simply be a set of individuals who use that power towards their individual ends (or example sitting on boards of pharma companies and steering policy towards their own profit.)

This is a nature of such organizations and how the nature of man is expressed through them. It's not that the WHO 'happens to have a bad group of men and women at this moment in history' ... it's that the nature of what the WHO is means it's guaranteed to be corrupt and at the same time to the MINIMUM necessary to maintain its existence.

The founders understood that all governments are evil. But to control a civilization of men with not yet enough concentration of men who can govern themselves, it's a necessary evil.

The WHO is not necessary. Therefore it is only evil ... while in the meantime doing the minimum necessary to make a show of doing good.

It's just ... the way it is when mankind in these types of groups with power. All the more worse when they masquerade as servants to humanity.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.