Posted on 11/08/2020 8:23:50 PM PST by Fitzy_888
Video at link.
8:32 minute video.
Article referenced in video:
AMERICAN THINKER: Mathematical impossibilities may be what trips up Democrat plans
By Andrea Widburg
Mathetical impossibilities doesn’t count as evidence in a court though.
YES it’s impossible, we know there is noway tens of thousands of batches of mail in ballots in the wee hours of the morning were counted they ALL could have went to one man (Biden). Bullshit, it’s not possible, but is it evidence in court? Probably not.
P
Probably inadmissible in court
I agree. Makes me sad, but I think it’s true.
We are in an age where video tape of Biden bragging that he strong-armed Ukraine was not convincing. Audio, Video, and email records of Hunter Biden were not convincing.
The bar is pretty high. It just is.
Holding up some math and saying “This doesn’t seem likely” is pretty weak sauce.
Actually it does because it shows there is a dead body somewhere. Next you need to dig to find the body and then the culprit. But is is a valid inidicator of fraud.
yes we need hard evidence-we all know they stuffed
Richard Baris at Peoples Pundit found this:
“Just under 10k confirmed dead returned absentee ballots in Michigan. We’re done, for now.
While I’m open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I’m not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected.
This was a small, tested listed that suggests irregs are plenty.”
https://twitter.com/Peoples_Pundit?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
I dunno. Could be inadmissible in court. However, we’re currently living the Doors song “Strange Days”, so I’d say nothing we thought we knew can be regarded as certain.
Zuckerburg thinks this is sexual. Someone on Facebook got locked out for talking about this. So it must have a use
Here is what the Chan’s have put together based on the election data from the NYT, explained in a way non-techies like me can understand:
The swing state data definitely shows anomalies with the absentee ballots: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1325592112428163072.html
But but but SCIENCE!!!!
Yeah, Rats.
If they know which voting districts were mathematically impossible that should be probable cause to trigger an audit. If there were a lot of mail in ballots, there’s a paper trail for that. Someone had to Inspect the ballot and record the vote.
As far as electronic machines are concerned, I’m not sure how that could be audited, but someone with experience with the machines could probably figure out if there’s tampering.
But it appears that mail ins were the primary means of fraud and involves A preponderance of Dem votes.
Let’s see if mail ins were recorded and then destroyed.
Although not proof, this type of analysis can nail down the the location and time the fraud occurred.
132k in Georgia are Destined for disposal so there is progress
The final courts of appeal are not the judicial courts but the state legislatures and their selection of the electors, so a PR campaign is important. Even in the judicial courts a public opinion can also be important.
I did a little analysis of GA here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3901227/posts?page=9894#9894,
But Laz’s mega research page has this and more:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3903425/posts
Tell that to the people who have been convicted of cybercrimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.