Posted on 08/20/2021 2:56:22 PM PDT by tatown
Yeah, no public discussion of the data is a problem.
Worse is: no actual collection of long term data.
These new jabs just came out, so long term efficacy / safety data is literally impossible to have. Worse, the dats that we do have strongly suggests that, for most people, the risk of the jabs may be worse than the risk of not getting the jabs.
Sure, there’s guesses and wishful thinking, but those are not the same thng.
After what happened with that near-worthless Biogen Alzheimer’s treatment (i.e., approving the drug even after the Advisory Board voted no), the FDA MUST review the covid vaccines via an Advisory Board!!!!
That might also help in dealing with the “vaccine hesitancy” issue!
Speeding up the process....so they can mandate the control group away.
do they all have pfizer stock options?
And no control group either.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3987213/posts?page=10
Post and discussion thread about legality of the mandate.
The end times are coming together perfectly
Of course they are going to approve it....without it few people will take the booster sending everyone back to square one...this has all been coordinated by Dr Falsi...a week ago he said ‘he hoped the FDA would approve it by the end of the month.’
That’s pretty obvious to those paying attention; to the rest of our fellow citizens, not so much....
And CDC employees still don’t have to get vaxxed.
And here it is...
""On 18 August, before the news that the FDA would not be holding a formal committee meeting, the president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Barbara Alexander praised the impact of the VRBPAC meetings as “a critical and necessary part” of the process for assessing whether to give booster doses.6""
There is no legitimate reason to push this hard for something that is 99.8% survivable.
The agenda here is NOT public Health and Safety.
.
(FDA) decision not to hold an ... advisory ... meeting to discuss Pfizer’s application for full approval of its covid-19 vaccine....
Did they ever release the vax studies for which they granted EUA’s?
Public health policy via Star Chamber.
Monday?
Nursing home my wife works at are highly recommending vaxxes for the staff but not quite forcing yet. She’ll be quitting if they go mandatory because of this. I’m going to suggest her an others that don’t want it band together by all handing in their two week notices the same day.
There is one legal strategy that might be worth a look.
It appears that folks who can prove they have the antibodies have been able to intimidate employers into giving them exemptions.
However, a good lawyer is required to make this happen.
It might be worth an exploratory phone call or two...
CDC and most of the medical field really. Big Pharma rules them. Even most doctors. Take Tylenol and if(when) you can't breathe, go to the hospital.
Should have seen the EUA meeting. One head guy rushing all the others and listing off things to not talk about.
We're trying to move my mother in law to another skilled nursing home for a wound caused by the hospital that won't heal. She's suffering from severe demensia and can't have surgery. Just got off the phone with one local facility and was told they are not accepting any new people as they are expecting to lose care nurses due to the vaxx mandate.
Embrace the suck.
All Fedgov agencies are corrupted to the core.
There has been no independent oversight committees on safety and ethics at all. Now a rubber stamp approval of a Faux Vax that has been the worst in USA history.
The whole bunch should be arrested, tried and hung from the highest tree including the Quackster Fraud Fauci, the CDC, and the FDA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.