Posted on 09/27/2021 3:21:20 PM PDT by zaxtres
Probably half the parents are smart enough to know how much masks are hurting their children with gum disease, oxygen depletion and psychological problems. They should all pull their children from mask mandating schools. Resist and refuse.
I agree with this judge.
But I also agree that anything the Federal government does regarding education is also unconstitutional.
Oops! I misread the headline. I disagree strongly with this judge.
I completely concur.
The answer to both the judge and the legislators is ...no
It is just you because you are finding something to nitpick about.
And you broke up mask mandate ban wrong. For example you would have broken up peanut butter and jelly sandwich and then platter the same when peanut butter and jelly sandwich platter is all one thing.
I've been saying for some time we forget about DC even State Capitols and rally/protest within legal distance of the homes of judges and politicians. Check out the local laws regarding distance from the home. I've read there are laws that require a minimum distance like down the block.
Whatever you do, DO NOT involve their children in any manner. If the subject of the rally has their children in their car going to and from the residence, stop the chanting/noise. If the children see the signs from the car or outside their window from down the street, that is fair.
Also, the subject of the rally may not need to be there. However, check with the local, county, and State LEO's. Just call and ask about your assembly. They will probably have time and crowd restrictions. Do your homework.
The above is the only way our side will start getting their attention. I've read 2 school boards recently reversed some bad policies after the parents made a big noise at the meetings and some protesting outside their residences.
I read a story years back of a town board that enacted a law that said people couldn’t park campers in front of their houses even in their driveways. Nobody complied, so they hired someone to write $500 dollar tickets. One night each of the five little dictators found cinder blocks fell through their windshields. The law was rescinded at the next meeting.
Not sure if you noticed that it is the Arizona State Constitution the judge claimed to be enforcing. No, I didn’t read the ruling. If you did, please explain how it was wrong re:AZ Constitution. Thank you.
The judge also said an entire budget measure that served as a
catch-all for a wish list of conservative policy items was
unconstitutional.
Unconstitutional? LMAO
States cannot make rules that cities and school districts
have to abide by now? It’s unconstitutional if they do?
Funny, I don’t recall ever seeing a judge state that, “a
catch-all for a wish list of Leftist policy items was
unconstitutional.
She tipped her hand.
She’s evidently a Leftist and can’t stomach the idea Republican
got their measures through.
She striking down portions of a state bill, she most certainly
has over-ruled the Legislature, and that is Legislating
from the bench. She determines what the final
legislation will look like. She determined the bill’s
final draft.
That is legislating from the bench.
Nevermind. I gather it’s a fight over including un-related items into a budget bill. Gee, the dem/soc/commies do it all the time.
Too bad...so sad.
What element of the state Constitution is the judge upholding ?
Yep, theydo.
Looks like the legislature had better go back to the drawing board. When will they be in session again? If not in session they had better call a special session.
It is way past time for all Republicans to show a spine. (especially Ducey)
Ignore the judge. The judge has a right to an opinion but has no right to make law. If the people don’t like the law they can vote out their senator/representative/governor for enacting it. The judge can pound sand. It’s important to remember that a law duly passed is still the law until the legislature changes or abolishes it.
So running for school boards doesn’t work if a communist judge can overturn anything you do?
Without religion, the people in robes become the high priests and priestesses in our Society.
Was there a factual basis for allowing a reduction of our freedom to be free from masks? Does not due process require that there be a basis for any deprivation of liberty in this country?
Is a deprivation of rights not a denial of due process when there is no factual or rational basis for that act?
Doesn’t anyone have to prove that masks are in any measure effective for the purposes intended?
I guess not. The burden used to be on the entity trying to take away a right of the people. Now, the burden is met by a mere rule without evidence of need or effectiveness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.