Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Juror Who Acquitted Sussmann: ‘There Are Bigger Things’ Than Lying to FBI
breitbart ^ | 31 May 2022 | JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 06/01/2022 5:50:44 AM PDT by MarvinStinson

A juror in the trial of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann told the media after he was unanimously acquitted Tuesday that she did not think the case should have been prosecuted because lying to the FBI was not a big deal.

“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” she reportedly said, according to Jeff Mordock, White House reporter for the Washington Times. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

The case was the most high-profile prosecution undertaken by Special Counsel John H. Durham, who is investigating the origins of the “Russia collusion” conspiracy theory. The trial saw testimony that tied Hillary Clinton directly to the hoax.

Sussmann was widely considered by legal observers to have been proven guilty, given the testimony of FBI agents and a text message that suggested he claimed to be acting as a concerned citizen rather than a Clinton campaign lawyer when he tipped off the agency about supposed collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump and the Russian government via Alfa Bank — a claim that was later debunked.

However, as former White House national security official Kash Patel warned on Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM Patriot 125 last week, there could be “jury nullification,” in which the jury simply decided not to convict, regardless of the evidence.

The juror’s attitude hinted at nullification, and contrasted sharply with the approach taken by a federal judge in the same D.C. jurisdiction when it came to former Trump aide Michael Flynn, who was charged with the same crime. Judge Emmet G. Sullivan would not let the case go, even after new evidence emerged that convinced prosecutors to withdraw the charge.

Ultimately, President Trump had to pardon Flynn to extricate him from what observers considered a wrongful prosecution.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: corrupticrats; coupdetat; demagogicparty; juror; jurynullification; michaelsussmann; sussmann; taintedjury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 06/01/2022 5:50:44 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

contrasted sharply with the approach taken by a federal judge in the same D.C. jurisdiction when it came to former Trump aide Michael Flynn, who was charged with the same crime.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan would not let the case go, even after new evidence emerged that convinced prosecutors to withdraw the charge


2 posted on 06/01/2022 5:51:40 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Bill Clinton 2.0

Guilty as hell, but it isn’t important when someone with a “D” after their name does it.


3 posted on 06/01/2022 5:51:48 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

The BFD defense. I wonder why this idiot was not eliminated during voir dire.


4 posted on 06/01/2022 5:53:03 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (All Hail the MAGA King, beloved of Ultra MAGAs and Deplorables!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Yes..... lying for the sake of greater good is the mantra of the Democratic party. Another fine precedent sets by the Rats.


5 posted on 06/01/2022 5:53:14 AM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

This “unimportant” lie led to the impeachment of a US President!!

but.. yeah.. nothing to see here! not important at all!


6 posted on 06/01/2022 5:53:39 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Guilty as hell, but it isn’t important when someone with a “D” after their name does it.

~~~

Yep. This is 50% bullcrunk excuse, and 50% psychological bias. To some degree, they have to buy into their own bull to live with themselves, but also, I bet some of them go home and tell their spouses, “Hah, I saved Hillary today”


7 posted on 06/01/2022 5:53:55 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Future jurists should think long and hard before they reflexively support charges brought by the government against a citizen.


8 posted on 06/01/2022 5:54:13 AM PDT by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

I wonder what THIS jury would do for the people still in prison since Jan. 6th?


9 posted on 06/01/2022 5:54:54 AM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
Who Is John Durham Targeting Next?

Kash Patel Calls On DOJ To Move Russia Hoax Trials Outside Of D.C. After Sussmann Verdict

10 posted on 06/01/2022 5:58:03 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Yes they should, they may as well start now. I mean it is a Queen of the realm. /S

Are you from DU or something?


11 posted on 06/01/2022 5:58:57 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts ((“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

So she believes he’s guilty of lying to the FBI.

Shouldn’t this be what they call a mistrial?


12 posted on 06/01/2022 6:02:37 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

“There Are Bigger Things’ Than Lying to FBI”

Huhhhh??


13 posted on 06/01/2022 6:04:05 AM PDT by SMARTY (“Liberalism is totalitarianism with a human face.” Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Is it ok to lie to the FBI now?


14 posted on 06/01/2022 6:04:28 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Alert! For anyone who may be interviewed by the FIB and charged with lying. Just remind them that there are bigger things than lying to the FIB. As I see it, this is a mistrial, did not follow the instructions or the law. Lying is a criminal offense.


15 posted on 06/01/2022 6:04:47 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

O.J. Simpson jury of creeps and idiots just transferred to the east coast. Did Sussman throw a party for them, too?


16 posted on 06/01/2022 6:06:13 AM PDT by Lockbar (Hate has no home in my house. It just rents space in my attic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

So the FBI is the highest law enforcement agency in the USA, so lady it’s ok to lie to the Police? Why stop there, ok to lie to IRS? Where does this stop?


17 posted on 06/01/2022 6:06:40 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

🤬


18 posted on 06/01/2022 6:07:05 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

The powers of evil run this land. In truth, I believe that Barry O was elected in 2008, and has not given the reins over to anyone else since. The Lords and Ladies of the realm support his Majesty.

We, as a Nation have given ourselves over to the rule of Kings. To call yourself a Sovereign is considered insane. That is what the common man is. ALL power is derived from the consent of the Governed. That phrase right there tells you who God in Heaven will judge for what this nation has become, US. We the People, who handed this land over to the very Jackals who spend centuries feasting off the flesh of others.


19 posted on 06/01/2022 6:07:12 AM PDT by Glad2bnuts ((“If there are no absolutes by which to judge society, then society is absolute.” Francis Schaeffer,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

From Wikipedia: “Jury nullification (US/UK), jury equity (UK), or a perverse verdict (UK) describes a not guilty verdict of a criminal trial’s jury despite a defendant having clearly broken the law.”


20 posted on 06/01/2022 6:08:06 AM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson