Posted on 07/04/2023 2:19:29 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
I expect the third shot being to the head while on the ground made all the difference. If it was at close quarters the head shot could be seen as the coup de grace meant to kill instead of a shot in defense.
If the small fella had been set on so much, who’s to say what was going through his mind. I wonder if his lawyer brought up the history of assaults at the trial?
” Or ... you could “wing him”, put away your weapon and try to reason with the killer.”
Sounds like a great idea!/s
Yes, he did. Pretty much all that did was show intent to kill.
Prosecutor: Why, after all these assaults, did he carry a weapon? To kill his tormentors, that’s why!
And I’m just saying, that’s the truth. But I sure don’t blame him. I might have done the same.
BTW. While he was in the County Jail my dad examined him and sent him to the hospital for anal rape on more than 1 occasion. The amusement of friends and family of the deceased was disgusting.
Sounds like the dead fella was just one of a whole host of demons. Anyone finding amusement in the homosexual rape of a smaller person is truly touched by the satanic.
If I’d been on that jury no way in the world would I have been able to vote to convict. I wonder if the jury members were afraid they would get the same treatment if they turned in a not guilty vote?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.