Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to overturn 2020 election, raising concerns about the next one
syracuse.com ^ | 10/26/23 | File AP

Posted on 10/26/2023 4:43:38 AM PDT by central_va

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: central_va

Republicans could try to subvert the will of the voters if they remain in power.

But the media has no problem when the democrats do just trying to cover their ass for their cover up operation of the rigged election.
By the democrats actions for the last 3 years no rigging will be needed everyone is hard pressed and 2 wars and maybe a WWIII chaos running wild.


61 posted on 10/26/2023 8:35:39 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
That being the case, why is it that the state’s executive branch certifies whether the electors were chosen legally?

In my particular state, the legislature gave the executive branch a wide range of oversight authority and powers to do exactly that.

That’s why I said from the start (September-November 2020) that the legislatures in all the contested states should have convened and set their own clear ground rules to deal with the overreach (as I saw it) of their executive branch officials.

62 posted on 10/26/2023 8:47:57 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

He also tried to respect the will of the voters. That’s the part they don’t like albeit tacitly.


63 posted on 10/26/2023 8:58:28 AM PDT by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I agree, the state legislatures in the fraud states are the ones who dropped the ball.

But I think the SC was wrong to toss out the Texas lawsuit on lack of standing. Since they declined to hear the case, there is no formal ruling or dissenting opinion, but it is noteworthy that Justices Thomas and Alito both said they wanted to hear the case.

In my opinion, those two Justices have by far the deepest and strictest understanding of the Constitution, which tells me there were solid Constitutional arguments in Paxton’s favor. I would have liked to hear them.

Unfortunately, they were overruled.


64 posted on 10/26/2023 9:04:50 AM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz

lol I get it!


65 posted on 10/26/2023 9:06:58 AM PDT by notdownwidems (Washington D.C. has become the enemy of free people everywhere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: central_va

He, like Trump and many others, tried to correct a fraudulent result.


66 posted on 10/26/2023 10:26:48 AM PDT by JimRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

As long as they keep framing it as “protecting our democracy”-aka fake nationalism-

this is textbook fascism.


67 posted on 10/26/2023 10:34:58 AM PDT by Freest Republican (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

No better recommendation than the MSM hates him.


68 posted on 10/26/2023 10:56:10 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Election denier like Hilliary?


69 posted on 10/26/2023 12:08:52 PM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

70 posted on 10/26/2023 12:32:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: central_va

Mike Johnson for President #48 after Trump leaves office on 2029


71 posted on 10/26/2023 12:40:39 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

He voted to certify the loser Pedophile ? Because that’s the only “overturning” that was done on 1/6/21, and every person that did needs to face charges of high treason.


72 posted on 10/26/2023 7:50:01 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson