Posted on 12/10/2023 8:13:28 PM PST by DoodleBob
In August 2021, Fox News’ “Gutfeld!,” a late-night comedy-talk show hosted by right-wing pundit Greg Gutfeld, overtook “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” in overall ratings.
Surprised?
We weren’t.
As media and comedy scholars, we’ve been tracking the recent ascension of right-wing comedy, which has flourished thanks to shifts in media industry economics and political ideologies.
Gutfeld’s success might come as a shock because it punctures long-standing assumptions about what comedy is, who can produce it and who will enjoy it. These prejudices obscure an important truth: Right-wing comedy has become both a viable business strategy and a crucial element of conservative politics.
Yes, “Gutfeld!” is on Fox News, the cable channel known for partisan, right-wing political perspectives and news commentary. But it has all the markers of late-night comedy, too. The opening monologues are filled with Jay Leno-like punchlines that draw laughs from the studio audience, and the interviews with conservative politicians, pundits and other comedians frequently center on “owning the libs” with one-liners.
Then, of course, there are the silly “Saturday Night Live”-like sketches. One recent episode broke from a panel discussion on cancel culture in order to imagine what a politically correct James Bond would look like. In the prerecorded bit, a crudely costumed actor chases down a thief and pulls a banana on him instead of a gun. Then “Bond” heads to a bar to order a latte – a soy latte – instead of a martini. You get the idea.
Regardless of whether or not this comedy is to your taste, it’s working for Gutfeld and his audience.
Despite its growing prominence, right-wing comedy remains largely invisible in both mainstream and scholarly discussions of media and humor. In part, this has happened because social media algorithms don’t send users jokes likely to challenge or offend their political sensibilities.
There are also intellectual trends that make it possible for Greg Gutfeld to spend two decades sneaking up on the Colberts of the world. Comedy theorists tend to diminish, or at least distinguish, right-wing humor from what they deem to be more authentic, liberal humor.
Philosopher Umberto Eco, for example, demotes joking that fails to critique power structures to the status of mere “carnival.”
Others make similar arguments, saying “true” liberal comedy is more likely to “punch up,” while dismissing conservative comedy as mere mockery that reaffirms unjust systems of power.
This effort to use ideology in order to categorize comedy can lead audiences, political analysts and even comedians to downplay or outright dismiss right-wing humor.
But even if conservative comedy doesn’t fit liberals’ tastes, it’s still comedy. And it’s increasingly becoming a feature of right-wing politics. Even “Daily Show” host Trevor Noah noted how former president Donald Trump’s performances at rallies mirrored those of stand-up comedians.
Some studies go as far as to identify innate, psychological differences that explain why liberals are more likely to laugh while conservatives are more prone to seethe. This research, often inspired by the success of liberal satirists such as Colbert, Jon Stewart and Samantha Bee, certainly provides intriguing looks into the relationship between politics, psychology and sense of humor. They are, without question, pleasing to the liberal reader’s ego.
They do not, however, square with the way Trump changed the country’s politics and culture.
The political comedy of the early 2000s, with its relatively big tent media companies and pre-Barack Obama politics, tended to joke primarily in the political direction of the largest audience segment interested in satire at that moment. “The Colbert Report” and “The Daily Show” became hugely successful during the years of president George W. Bush and inspired countless imitators, crowding the media marketplace for liberal laughs.
However, comedy’s perceived political bias at the time was more likely driven by specific economic circumstances, which have now radically changed.
Since then, further audience fragmentation, along with the proliferation of podcasts and social media platforms, has made it possible for right-wing comedians like YouTuber Steven Crowder to rise to prominence beyond conventional cable television. And it’s forced networks like Fox News to take comedy seriously.
On one level, Gutfeld succeeds today because he has virtually no competition from fellow conservatives in the late-night television comedy space. On another, he thrives because the current media industry moment is built not for a big tent of all viewers, but for audiences who share specific demographic, psychographic and political traits.
In this environment, the partisanization of comedy to the right was perhaps inevitable.
If you find comedians such as Gutfeld unfunny or, more to the point, offensive, you may ask whether he should be granted the honorific of comedian.
Failing to do so, we argue, obscures the ways in which the right-wing political world uses comedy as a recruiting tool and unifying force. Republican politics have long been built upon an uneasy fusion that aims to bind together libertarian and traditionalist values, despite their apparent contradictions. The crassness of Trumpism has only added to this conceptual tension.
Right-wing comedy, we argue, serves to iron out, or at least paper over, such philosophical divides.
In addition to his show’s success, Gutfeld today resides at the center of a growing complex of comedians reflecting elements of right-wing worldviews, ranging from libertarian, libertine podcasts like “The Joe Rogan Experience” to Christian satire websites like The Babylon Bee to Proud Boys founder and Gutfeld-protégée Gavin McInnes. While the creators of this content don’t always agree on specific issues, they are united in their motivations to hilariously own the libs. They strategically cross-promote one another, while social media algorithms urge fans of one program to check out other flavors of right-wing comedy.
Gutfeld may be the biggest star, but a range of right-wing comedians are coming together in a constellation that allows young, right-wing-curious consumers to find a place in the universe of American conservative media and politics. The value, or danger, of right-wing comedy is a matter of political opinion.
Its reality, however, is no joke.
Colbert is born and bred DC. It was only a matter of time before the rabid leftism overtook him.
“I saw someone (I can’t remember who) recently commenting that the left only does material that makes people in political agreement with them clap but not really laugh. IMO, that ‘s not comedic.”
Liberal late-night host: “Donald Trump is a racist, and his voters are stupid,”. Audience cheers.
Rival liberal late-night host: “Donald Trump is stupid, and his voters are racists.” Audience cheers.
No laughs, just cheers. Rush used to say effective humor has a grain of truth behind it. The left just doesn’t have that anymore.
I recall that Jay Leno wrote a lot of his own monologues, so he was able to weather the strikes with live shows, no matter what.
We watch most nights. Fewer poop jokes, but still too many, IMO. My 5-year-old granddaughters would have loved them, but at 7, they’ve outgrown them. Also too many jokes about having women in basements and vans.
I think he’d get an even bigger audience if he didn’t make the show so Fox-centric. What’s his obsession with Brian Kilmeade and Larry Kudlow. The jokes about them make no sense and non-Fox viewers don’t know who they are.
Colbert is the nastiest # I’ve every seen on TV.
“ Are his jokes still 50% homosexual and poop? That’s the reason I stopped watching his show.”
Yes. Awful.
“ The best comedians left you wondering what they voted for. Johnny Carson for example.”
The best comedians left you not caring what they voted for. Johnny Carson for example.
Ah so liberal leaning comedy “punches up” in their words. Do tell me about SNL and all those late night comedians jokes about Obama. I mean, he was president for 8 years. You don’t get more “up” than that. What did they make fun of him for?
*crickets*
BTW, who is “up”? Isn’t it most billionaires? Who do they vote for? Isn’t it CEO’s of major corporations? Who do they support? How about Wall Street? Who do they give the most money to? Big Tech? Oh I know! How about Hollywood and Academia?
Who’s really punching “up”? Here’s a hint - it ain’t liberals/leftists.
Somewhere in there I hear The Spanish Inquisition.😉
Greg built a winning cast
Kat Timpf is clever, and hawt
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6342639538112
Timpf is from Detroit, Michigan. She graduated magna cum laude in 2010 from Hillsdale College with a B.A. in English.[12][13]
Much of Left wing talk show laughter is just agreement. The jokes aren’t funny. The audience is just agreeing
Late-night dumbassity is all the RATS have. It does make the “slow” college kiddies in their “I GO TO COLLEGE” sweat shirts laugh though when they are high or drunk.
He is not missing you.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
Hows Colbert doing these days with his “appendicitis?”
Oxymoron; Liberal humor. It just isn’t funny.
So many comedians I never would have known without the Gutfeld show! The fact the mainstream Left media doesn’t even know about them is a blessing, because as they get famous, they try to cancel them.
Of course, regulars like Tyrus and Kat.
Jamie Lissow is a comedic power force.
Tom Shillue’s Biden is the best impersonation ever.
Jimmie Falla, Joe Devito, and Joe Machi are Staff comedians who get to be on periodically and are great.
I also never would have heard of: Tyler Fischer, Mike Baker, Mike Loftus, Kennedy, Jim Florentine, or David Angelo.
And people I wouldn’t say are comedians but are outright funny include Dagan McDowell, Julie Bandaras, Buck Sexton, Erin Prerrine, Lee Zeldin, Douglads Murry and Walter Kernm, to name a few.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.