Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary has one vote to be first U.S. woman president (Chills & Shivers Alert)
The Free Lance-Star ^ | Sun, 01/05/2003 | DONNIE JOHNSTON

Posted on 01/05/2003 8:19:26 AM PST by livesbygrace

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: mystery-ak
DONNIE JOHNSTON covers the Culpeper area for The Free Lance-Star. Write him...
21 posted on 01/05/2003 8:33:14 AM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Yeah, most kids stop using "Donnie" in their early teens.
22 posted on 01/05/2003 8:33:43 AM PST by CPOSharky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lainie
You may be on to something regarding the memo idea. Consider this assertion by Donnie:

Should Hillary Clinton be elected president, it is highly doubtful that her husband would return to the White House as first gentleman.

That smells like a talking point. There is absolutely nothing to support this notion except that hrc may realize what a hindrance her "spouse" would be, so realized the need to float this idea. I don't believe for one minute they won't remain married. Why even Donnie, clearly an avid supporter, follows up with:

That possibility, however, may be the senator's biggest obstacle in any bid for the presidency.

23 posted on 01/05/2003 8:33:55 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
At worst, she would be the best-looking president this nation ever had.

This person's obvious bad taste aside, I thought enlightened liberals weren't supposed to be concerned about a woman's looks?

24 posted on 01/05/2003 8:35:12 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
Why, she may have even tucked the old ones away in anticipation of a presidential run, a fact that could save taxpayers decorating money next January.

NEXT January? This speaks volumes about the intellect of the author of this piece. Unfortunately, there are MILLIONS of college age women who would vote for her just to put a woman in the White House. You will see a mass exodus of people from this country if she is elected, starting with me.



25 posted on 01/05/2003 8:37:39 AM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
At worst, she would be the best-looking president this nation ever had.

I think he meant to say:

At best, she would be the worst president this nation ever had.

26 posted on 01/05/2003 8:38:08 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Thanks....got a kick out of referring to Bill Clinton as *First Gentleman*....ROTFLMAO
27 posted on 01/05/2003 8:38:32 AM PST by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
I thought enlightened liberals weren't supposed to be concerned about a woman's looks?

The lie was put to that notion when the clinton women (for want of a better phrase) were the topic of discussion. Especially the vicious attacks on Linda Tripp. But all of the women were attacked about their looks to one degree or another.

28 posted on 01/05/2003 8:38:35 AM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
At worst, she would be the best-looking president this nation ever had.

He means...At best, she would be the worst-looking president.

29 posted on 01/05/2003 8:41:28 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
White House window measurements and could have curtains ordered the day after she is elected. Why, she may have even tucked the old ones away...

In her pantsuit!

30 posted on 01/05/2003 8:41:41 AM PST by VoiceOfBruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Better than Martin Van Buren???


Martin Van Buren


Hitlery

No contest. Although, she would be our first Black female President.


31 posted on 01/05/2003 8:42:15 AM PST by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The lie was put to that notion when the clinton women (for want of a better phrase) were the topic of discussion. Especially the vicious attacks on Linda Tripp. But all of the women were attacked about their looks to one degree or another.

Yes, and all of a sudden you couldn't believe a woman about rape or harrassment allegations either. They were all either members of a VRWC or gold-digging trailer trash. Such principled people, these leftists are!

32 posted on 01/05/2003 8:42:28 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
At worst, she would be the best-looking president this nation ever had.

Oh, Puleeeeeeeze!!!!!!!!!


33 posted on 01/05/2003 8:44:21 AM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
THIS GUY IS AN ASSHOLE
34 posted on 01/05/2003 8:47:51 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
Republicans have traditionally been viewed as "the haves" and Democrats as "the have-nots," and the latter group has been steadily increasing in number since the Bush administration took power.

I guess this moron missed the last election.

35 posted on 01/05/2003 8:48:04 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
It's interesting that Team Clinton has decided to start the "buzz" this early.

Too soon to know what it means. I'm one of those who thinks she wants to go in 2004, but would prefer a "draft" to running in the primaries.

All of these planted stories about how much in demand she is, though, would tend to make me think she is running straight-up.

Only if Bush is high in the polls will she allow a stooge to run (like Edwards), and if he is looking good in October he'll get Fostered and replaced.

I think that if AQ can pull off another attack here, Bush is in big trouble. It makes no sense, of course, because any RAT would already have had Osama to tea at the White House-but Bush has failed to secure the borders and the interior, and if this costs us lives he can expect to pay the price.

He must feel lucky.

36 posted on 01/05/2003 8:48:31 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
37 posted on 01/05/2003 8:48:45 AM PST by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Oh Wiz, your wording is so eloquent! :-)
38 posted on 01/05/2003 8:49:16 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
Still, the Democrats will need a strong candidate to unseat Bush, and I don't see a man in the ranks who is up to the task.

Well, he DID hit the nail on the head with this.

39 posted on 01/05/2003 8:53:29 AM PST by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livesbygrace
People who think like this believe that Osama bin Laden acts out of humanitarian impulses, sort of like an Islamic Albert Schweitzer. Their world view (or as Al Gore would say, Weltanschauung) is not materially affected by reality. This dude has one messed up Zeitgeist.
40 posted on 01/05/2003 8:56:49 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson