Posted on 01/05/2003 7:36:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:30:07 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
The most it can do now is defend fortified positions. And most of North Korea is a fortified position - they've poured enough concrete in the past 40 years to make Japan's Yakuza green with envy.
And they can fire artillery at pre-planned targets, i.e., Seoul.
The North Korean soldiers--especially their special ops people--are nasty, tenacious, tough, and well able to live off the land. When I was there the South Korean forces discovered two or three infiltrations (which always made me wonder how many weren't discovered). The South Korean forces hunted them down like dogs, and took none of them live as far as I remember. They fought to the death.
These are not Iraqis.
These guys are the only real wildcards. I grimace every time I tag the word 'special forces' to them (hence the quotes) but I've heard too many first hand accounts of dealing with them to dismiss them out of hand.
I think comparisons between the Iraqis and the North Koreans are bound to fail. My area of focus is on the Chinese, and even they don't offer as much insight into the NKs as I'd like.
From what I've been told, the first week of fighting would be like nothing we've ever seen. Their soldiers, as you know, are extremely hardened to suffering, and would fight savagely at first. As they fought for a few days, moving south, and their supplies in all categories dried up, their units moving south would likely suffer mass desertions. There is a very great chance that the invasion would quickly collapse into a humanitarian disaster of fleeing NK troops.
While that was certainly correct during the time of Park Chung-Hee (and the treatment of ROK Airborne trainees made Fort Benning look like a girl's finishing school!), there was a wave of public disgust about this brutality in the 1970's- and I doubt that discipline in the ROK Army is anything like it was then. (But then, there are probably a LOT fewer "fragging" incidents than there used to be when the troops were treated like animals...)
This makes sense. You may well be right. I pray you are.
They have no chance against nerve gas bombardment - two million dead and 10 million injured in the first week is a reasonable wild-assed guess. After that it depends on how much short-term radioactive fallout from what had been NK drifts over the Seoul area.
Koreans are not Japanese. The former will obey planning directives. The Japanese showed they wouldn't in the Kobe earthquake. All the ganjin obeyed the earthquake drill instructions and evacuated damaged buildings for relocation centers. The Japanese stayed in burning and falling-down buildings until police or fire personnel came by and ordered them to evacuate. It was pretty strange. Hundreds of Japanese civilians died that way.
But ROK civilians will obey the civil defense plans. Most of the males served in the ROKA.
This is the crux of the North's problems. The NKPA, as it exists now, is not a force that could pursue US/ROK forces down to Pusan. It is a one shot sledgehammer that would destroy Seoul and most of central Korea, and then shatter. Whether South Korea would survive the chaos is unknown, but their military would, and we'd chase the NKs back north and decapitate them, collapsing the whole deck.
Their civil defense is definitely not bad, but the South Koreans never struck me as particularly hardy. Especially given the character of the younger crowd, I can't imagine them sticking to the plan for long. I think panic during a natural disaster is one thing, but panic before an advancing enemy is quite another.
Expecting military units to hold under such intense fire is sometimes an iffy thing. Expecting civilians to hold may be expecting too much.
I know what you're trying to say, but when I read this sentence the images that popped into my mind were of the high-rise department store and main river bridge in Seoul that collasped in utter heaps and ruin under the weight of ordinary shoppers and traffic six or seven years ago, killing thousands. I have never been impressed with Korean structural engineering and building practices. They are spotty at best.
I certainly take your point that the soldiers chosen to infiltrate the South were bound to be among the best they had- equivalent to our own Rangers, although without the extensive technical training and lavish logistical support. However, that does NOT mean that the rest of their army is chopped liver!
I believe that the vast majority of NK soldiers would obey their officers and fight very hard- I do not see "mass desertions" as a real probabilty (until the war is lost for them, anyway).
You obviously have considerable knowledge of the area and the people- but I think you underestimate the threat.
Let's all pray that we don't have to find out which of us is right!
Try the first few hours.
Pyongyang Calls On All Koreans to Confront U.S.
Lessons From The Koran-Iraq Urges All Arabs to Follow North Korea
South Korea Denounces US Pressure On Stalinist North
Pyongyang a Master of 'The Game'
North Korea raises the stakes...'U.S. is Plotting War' Playing Poker With North Korea
War with North Korea is now the unavoidable choice facing America
North Korea Defiant Amidst U.S. Threats
North Korea puts banned guns on South border (in violation of an armistice accord)
I was going to mention that very problem- Korean (as many other Asian engineering projects) look impressive- but they are invariably built "on the cheap", with the minimum amount of reinforcing steel, poor-quality concrete (sand is cheap, concrete is not) and often just plain bad design- like adding floors to a building that was not originally designed for that. (That would be the department store that fell down...)
I think that the soaring towers of Seoul would be heaps of rubble on Day One of the war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.