Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2003 7:08:40 AM PDT by F_Cohen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: F_Cohen
My 22 year old son said years ago that first they get us to accept homosexual sex, then necrophilia, beastiality, and pedophilia.
2 posted on 07/08/2003 7:16:52 AM PDT by buffyt (Can you say President Hillary, the Hildabeast, Mistress of ALL Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/08/2003 7:17:59 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Impeach The Sodomy Six!
4 posted on 07/08/2003 7:20:34 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Our old decaying members of the SCOTUSA have once again open the door to let more deamons loose.

And of course our spineless elected officals are more concerned about reelection than what is moral, and will do nothing to counteract the pervision let loose again as they did nothing to prevent the murder of millions and millions of defenseless inocent babies from be torn apart by the murder for money crowd.

The next preversion to go before this decaying group will be even more evil, and will once again this group will set themselves up to invent new rules they feel are just.

5 posted on 07/08/2003 7:21:53 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Democrat Rep. James P. Moran of Virginia commented, "The government has no business regulating or legislating morality

Then what the hell are we doing with laws the prohibit murder and theft? Those laws are taken directly from the Ten Commandments, which also means, of course, they violate the separation of church and state as well.

Open up those prison doors and let my people go!

6 posted on 07/08/2003 7:31:11 AM PDT by Houmatt (If it is about what goes on in the bedroom, why doesn't it stay there? And leave our kids alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
"I have no problem accepting the fact that someone, through no fault of his own, is attracted to children..."

"I have no problem accepting the fact that Typhoid Mary contracted the disease through no fault of her own... So she shouldn't be quaranteened, even though she's spreading a deadly disease, because it's not her fault...

Jeez, these people make me sick.

Mark

10 posted on 07/08/2003 8:00:31 AM PDT by MarkL (OK, I'm going to crawl back under my rock now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
This guy is good. WHo is he?
11 posted on 07/08/2003 8:05:08 AM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
This ruling will do wonders for Clinton's home state. No more incest jokes since brothers and sisters and other family members will have the right to privacy.
12 posted on 07/08/2003 8:06:57 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen; sinkspur; tpaine; tdadams; breakem; Kevin Curry; ArGee; L.N. Smithee; Polycarp; ...
I've been saying this for years. Liberaltarian social experiment BUMP and the Consequences of selfishness.
13 posted on 07/08/2003 8:08:40 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Does anybody here seriously think that the SC would allow sex with children, if it somehow made it all the way there. Seriously, the speculation is a bit silly. There is a big difference between sex between adults and sex with children who can't really consent. I don't like homosexuality, and I'll speak my mind about it and take shots at it, but I won't try and use something as ridiculous as this opening the door to sex with children to go after it. I, and most everybody else here, can make much better cases against homosexuality.
14 posted on 07/08/2003 8:14:13 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
“consenting adult” is homosexual propaganda and redundant. If one has the mental capacity to consent then one is an adult and the legislature be damned. Child emancipation happens all the time in the courts by a standard of IQ, capacity to consent applies in Texas for the death penalty, power of attorney and emancipating the mentally ill, and there is NO reason other than arbitrary law that children can’t meet this burden.
16 posted on 07/08/2003 8:17:34 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
"This is not a glorious and beautiful time to be a gerbil."
21 posted on 07/08/2003 8:32:56 AM PDT by Dionysius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen; .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; aposiopetic; ...
Homosexual predation of young male teenagers is rampant and culturally accepted in the homosexual movement, and it is irrefutably the ROOT CAUSE of the current crisis in the Roman Catholic Church.

Its no longer about just letting two consenting adults do whatever they want in the "privacy" of their own bedroom.

Theirs is an all out, full court press to stigmatize ANYONE who rejects the notion that homosexual behavior is intrinsically disordered, and to tear down ANY remaining legal constraints against their behavior, including predation of young teenagers.

Always remember the words of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg:

As an attorney for the ACLU Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg co-authored a report recommending that the age of consent for sexual acts be lowered to 12 years of age ("Sex Bias in the U.S. Code," Report for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, April 1977, p. 102).

The paragraph reads as follows: "Eliminate the phrase "carnal knowledge of any female, not his wife, who has not attained the age of 16 years" and substitute a federal, sex-neutral definition of the offense.... A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person.... [and] the other person is, in fact, less than 12 years old..)"

24 posted on 07/08/2003 8:43:34 AM PDT by Polycarp (When a mother can kill her own child, what is left of the West to save?" - Mother Theresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
A Fundamental Constitutional Right To Have Sex With Children, Too?

Hey, maybe this guy can make that argument when he comes to court.

32 posted on 07/08/2003 9:05:11 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
It's time to enlarge the Supreme Court to at least eleven. Or thirteen or fifteen if that's what it takes.
54 posted on 07/08/2003 10:20:12 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
BTTT
64 posted on 07/08/2003 10:37:15 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (~~~ http://www.ourgangnet.net ~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
The Constitution does not forbid age-related restrictions. Indeed, it contains several.

-Eric

81 posted on 07/08/2003 11:00:40 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Do we dare say the proper "rearing" children in these hair raising, interesting times?

CPS will be down on us faster than a Democrat's intern.
110 posted on 07/08/2003 12:14:04 PM PDT by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Well, folks, don't you think it's time to pray for our Justice system? This group of people has made so many laws barring moral values and what we as Americans feel is the moral high ground, that we need to get good conservative, right thinking judges in there. Prayer can do that. God is willing, but are we? Pat Robertson is doing a 21 day prayer vigil (for lack of the right word) for the Supreme Court. There are possibly three who may retire and we want good people in there who have common sense. Time to pray!
121 posted on 07/08/2003 12:34:11 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: F_Cohen
Funds extorted from the American people and then returned as an entitlement opiate, along with the whims of the activist judges, have been instrumental in rendering the Tenth Amendment meaningless.

Amen, brother, except I don't hear any objections from your corner
as Ashcroft's forces roll unimpeded into California and Oregon in
search of homegrown herb or assisted suicide.  Now the Tenth
Amendment is suddenly meaningless, as if its rape and pillage
hasn't be going on with your blessing for the last forty years.  

The US is ready for boarding.  Do you want whining or nonwhining?
144 posted on 07/08/2003 1:51:24 PM PDT by gcruse (There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson