CFA: Strengthen the Federal Assault Weapons Ban; Demand President Bush Keep His Promise

www.consumerfed.org ^ | 09-10-03

[Area51]

Paging Registered!!! Mr. Registered, your assistance is needed at the front desk Can't you use your graphics magic and turn this weapon around in UpChuckie's hand?

[from occupied ga]

... loyalty oaths to the Constitution ...

Doesn't mean squat. Kongress, Pres take oaths to uphold the Constitution and usually violate them within 24 hours. Once you give politicians and bureaucrats power over your life, used toilet paper is worth more than their promises. The only thing that worries 99% of 'em is the 2nd amendment* (which is why they're trying to get rid of it, of course)

*Henry Waxman's, one of the many anti-gun Nazis from the Peoples' Democracy of Kalifornia, fear of .50 cal rifles is that they could puncture a limousine - what's that tell you about Waxman?

[Dead Corpse]

Make violation of that Oath of Office a capital offense.

[from occupied ga]

any other ideas

Yes, but none of them fit to print here, but combine "gay", "action", "SS uniform" and maybe "dead goat" and you'll have some of them.

[from occupied ga]

Make violation of that Oath of Office a capital offense

OK with me, but how do you enforce it when the government that violates it is the one that claims to have the only moral justification for the use of force?

[Dead Corpse]

You really think the Piranha's wouldn't eat their own?

[King Prout]

I dunno about registered, but I just doctored it - but I cannot post it here: no website from which to source it.
you want it? FReepmail me with your email and I'll send it to you.

[King Prout]

Make oathbreaking a hanging offense... and enforce it.

[bc2]

you have FR mail

[King Prout]

you have e-mail :)

[bc2]

[from occupied ga]

You really think the Piranha's wouldn't eat their own?

Maybe, but not for anything significant. For example, when was the last time you heard of a cop being charged for killing an innocent person?* If they won't eat their own for somthing like that, they sure won't for something as abstract as violating oath of office. I can remember hearing of one case where someone successfully sued a sheriff for improperly denying denying a carry permit, but by the time it was finally resolved both the plaintiff and the guilty party were in their late 70's.

*Like maybe never. Now does this meant that cops never kill innocents, or does this just mean that they get a free pass for illegal and immoral behavior because they're government bureaucrats?

[King Prout]

your wish has been granted.

[TC Rider]

Responsible gun owners snicker everytime they see that snapshot of Chucky, no PhotoShop retouch by Registered is required.

Chucky is violating a major safety rule.

[bc2]

no frickin' eye protection!!!

[King Prout]

eyewear? or the more obvious: Chuckie should never handle a firearm?

[Dead Corpse]

That is our fault. We need to let them know they are accountable. "We the People..." are the Rulers in this country. Time to remind our "Civil Servants" of that fact.

[King Prout]

The obvious question: How to do so in a manner that will get the point across inarguably, unspinnably, and memorably?

[xrp]

Hey igno-ramous...the root word in Libertarians is Liberty, not liberal. DUH>

[Fred Mertz]

Good work on the Chuckie pic.