Posted on 09/20/2021 2:59:07 PM PDT by ebb tide
Francis has promoted same-sex civil unions in the past, making his strongest statement on the issue last year in the documentary film Francesco, in which he stated, “What we have to create is a civil union law. That way they are legally covered. I stood up for that.”
......
Compare to:
The Church has already considered the question of same-sex unions in civil law, notably in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith’s (CDF) 2003 document “Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons.”
At that time the CDF, headed by then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, reiterated that “homosexual acts go against the moral law,” instructing that “all Catholics are obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions.”
In conclusion, the CDF stated that the Church “teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behaviour or to legal recognition of homosexual unions.”
Ping
What say you, Mr. Chips?
Truth to power
Benedict XVI is my Pope and Trump is my President.
I think the answer for the Christian churches, independent of country should be, “You can write anything you desire into your constitutions and regulations, but don’t ever call it marriage. God created the single institution of heterosexual marriage as the earthy manifestation of the absolute unity and love He seeks with each person, and you have no right to corrupt its meaning”.
I’ll second that.
Me too. But I lament that the former wasn’t blessed with the latter’s determination and thick skin.
I disagree. No christian churches should recognize unions of sodomites.
Frankie the marxist is a PINO....Pope In Name Only
I was a whole lot more comfortable with the previous two popes. This one —- not.
That is why Benedict is still Pope.
Retaining marriage as a Christian institution means not being required to recognize unions of sodomites. Christians should be able to live out their spiritual faith without secular governments corrupting the meaning of marriage. Governments should proceed with the level of tolerance, which allows Christians to be in a country, but not necessarily of the country in every way. Governments can then use their penchants for elegant writings to describe whatever other unions they want between humans. Just leave stark contrast to exist.
“Benedict XVI is still Pope”
That is, amazingly, actually a serious possibility.
I disagree. Any government that protects and enforces legal infanticide, euthanasia or sodomite unions, is evil. Governments should not tolerate evil.
Pope Benedict XVI is right; Francis in wrong.
THANK GOD FOR THE REAL POPE !!
In that same year, the Supreme Evil Court, overturned those laws in the case of Lawrence v. Texas.
In 2015, the Supreme Evil Court, ruled all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges.
And you guys are OK with this sinking of morals in this country?
Leaving the stark contrast to exist means being allowed to be an agitating, contentious force against whatever is proposed. Unfortunately, too often now churches yield to pressures about them and find satisfaction in having the church’s website added to a person’s favorites on Internet Explorer, along with Oprah, Dr. Phil and PBS.
What are you babbling about?
It sounds you are advocating for homo civil unions. Are you?
Like BLM riots against proposed curfews, where life and property are lost?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.