Posted on 02/18/2022 6:52:30 AM PST by Heartlander
Religion is the opiate of the masses.” In a single, swift turn of phrase, Marx had created a credo for the secular left. Opium, of course, is the drug of addicts; addicts cannot see beyond their chemical dependency. But if they were to lock themselves in a room and face the cold sweat withdrawals of truth, the addicts could be freed from their affliction. The veil of ignorance blinding their judgment would be torn away. Rationalist sobriety saves.
But what if irreligion is the true opiate of the masses—what if unbelief is the valium of the self-professed valiant?
The ontological arch of modern political liberalism’s prehistory can be traced to the figures of Michel de Montaigne and Blaise Pascal. The great dialectical struggle between reason and faith, instantaneous joys and eternal bliss, predates Marx, and even Enlightenment secularism, by centuries.
Because sixteenth-century France was roiled by sectarian bloodshed, Montaigne averred, without ever formally renouncing his faith, that life’s guiding principle in the public sphere must be “immanent contentment”—that is, various pursuits of pleasure. Everyone was to become a hobbyist or a dabbler, never taking himself too seriously and flitting gaily from one pursuit to the next. If sixteenth-century Renaissance humanism was in some respects a dry run for the historical materialism that came to predominate modern thought, seventeenth-century Baroque literature and art was in many ways the precursor to the great Romantic religious revival of the early nineteenth century that echoes into the present.
Pascal is famous in modern eyes for his “wager”—that by betting on God you have nothing to lose and everything to gain. But there was more to Pascal’s thinking than that. Pascal’s greater philosophical “wager” was not just that we should bet on God, but that, ultimately, thoughts of eternity—whether of eternal life or infinite nothingness—could not be avoided, no matter how hard we tried to distract ourselves with amusement.
“We do not need a greatly elevated soul to understand that there is no real and solid satisfaction here; that all our pleasures are only vanity,” Pascal tells us in his “Letter to Further the Search for God.”
In the same letter, he goes on to characterize two kinds of atheists: the true searchers, we might call them, and those who indulge in the opiate of thoughtless unbelief.
The immortality of the soul is something so important to us, something that touches us so profoundly, that we must have lost all feeling to be indifferent to knowing the facts of the matter. . . . Thus our prime interest and prime duty is to become enlightened on this subject, on which all our conduct depends. And that is why, with respect to those who are not convinced, I make a sharp distinction between the ones who labor with all their power to inform themselves and the ones who live without being troubled or thinking about it [emphasis mine].
Is there really any doubt, in a world where you can order dope to your doorstep and access porn from your smartphone, which kind of de facto atheism our society has embraced? Is our society not by and large religiously illiterate, or “indifferent” in Pascal’s word, to arguments such as those of Aquinas in his Summa Theologica proving the existence of God? The French word divertissement, the word for “entertainment” in English, also contains the Latin root for “diversion”; “to turn away, divert, make a detour, digress.”
Unbelief is the actual opiate of the masses. By tuning in to diversionary pleasures, we are actually tuning out; we are all addicts of the momentary rush of dopamine that sundry amusement, from jogging to drug use, gives us.
Every time I crack open a beer on a Friday afternoon, I recognize Montaigne in myself; and every time I lie awake at night racked with worry, I imagine Pascal’s Pensees, his tormented thoughts, have become mine.
Perhaps it's time for a paradigm shift in the way we think about God in the modern secular West. After two centuries in which religiosity has been widely seen as the “opiate of the masses,” it’s time to turn the screws on the comfortably agnostic and atheist. The intellectual laziness is theirs. As Pascal says: “Let us reflect . . . and then say whether it is not beyond doubt that the only good in this life lies in the hope of another.”
My other favorite quote, from Jordan Peterson is
“If religion is the opiate of the masses, then Marxism is the crack cocaine”
It always has been and always will be. Broad is the path that leads to destruction, and many there are that follow it.
Thankfully though, despite massive attempts to annihilate religion, true Christianity has stood the test of time because it has God as its protection. Try as they might, the irreligious can not stamp it out no matter how brutal they become towards God’s people.
Could you provide a few examples of untrue Christianity?
Jim Jones and his gang.
There’s a stairway to heaven and a highway to hell.
There’s al. Kinds of faux “christians” out there- if you aren’t aware of that by now, I don’t know what to tell you. The internet has ample evidence of it readily available.
It makes sense that the fattest, most passively entertained and comfortable people in all of history also have the least faith. It seems to simply be following human nature and history.
“By tuning in to diversionary pleasures, we are actually tuning out; we are all addicts of the momentary rush of dopamine that sundry amusement, from jogging to drug use, gives us.”
If I had to choose, I’d prefer more jogging culture and less screen culture. We are probably way closer to something like Brave New World than 1984, in my opinion.
Freegards
Yup. Also, Many will stand before Christ claiming to have been Christians, and Christ Will Say to them “depart, I never knew you”. While.there will be billions who have truly been saved, many more billions choose the highway to hell.
It's two worlds; those seeking somma in their four walls of artificial reality and those embracing all the education available from other regular individuals online and then going out and doing it.
During the Scamdemic, television viewing went down while barbecue grills, bicycles, and firearms got harder and harder to find.
So, you can't tell me, but the internet can? I think I'm beginning to see problem.
During the ascendancy of progressive thought in the early 20th century, G.K. Chesterton said something to the effect of (and I'm paraphrasing here):
I've been asked many times why I cling to an ancient and antiquated faith. I believe it precisely because it is ancient and antiquated. Unlike any other belief system it has been tried, tested, persecuted, prosecuted, assailed, scorned, and subjected to the greatest scrutiny, and yet in the face of all that, it has endured.
Grills,
Bicycles and Guns.
Good point.
Scientism is becoming a religion. It will be the opiate of the masses. Already on this round of nonsense in the world, we had “officials” saying “Trust the science” and Fauci claiming he “represents science”. Fauci is the high priest of scientism.
Theres no problem at all. I can, but if you TRULY are jnterested in finding the answers, and not just wanting to play gotcha games which you think you win but In The end don’t, then it would be better for you to go find out for yourself. There are multiple examples of false Christianity for your perusal online. Knock yourself out.
“During the Scamdemic, television viewing went down while barbecue grills, bicycles, and firearms got harder and harder to find.”
Yup, it’s hard to reconcile exercise equipment being sold out all during the plandemic while the obesity rate supposedly rose into the low 40% ranges for the first time ever. It was already weird with the poor being the most likely to be obese and the rich being the most likely to be thin.
Remember how many predicted a sharp uptick in births after the lockdowns? Maybe that would have happened in the 30s or 40s. But the birth rate supposedly has plummeted, probably due to the availability of passive screen entertainment, uncertainty and readily accessible birth control.
FReegards
Good quote, and very true. True Christianity has stood the test of time because our God is timeless and protects us, and keeps us until that day.
Oh, brilliant. I hope I remember that one.
Not really. True Christians are,those whom,christ will tell “well done thou good an faithful servant. False religions claiming to be Christian adopt the title Christian, but they aren’t true Christians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.