Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

On schedule for an April trial. Notice that judge has already excluded key testimony.
1 posted on 01/31/2005 1:29:06 PM PST by KiloLima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


It's about time!


3 posted on 01/31/2005 1:35:33 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KiloLima

Guilty. Wall. Read, aim, fire! That works for me.


9 posted on 01/31/2005 1:48:09 PM PST by RetiredArmy (The Democratic Party would make Uncle Joe Stalin Proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KiloLima
The judge excluded statements Akbar made to two sergeants who guarded him after the attack, saying Akbar had not yet been informed of his legal rights.

I am convinced that "Miranda" was established solely to protect guilty criminals with big mouths. I really despise our system of justice.

14 posted on 01/31/2005 2:41:22 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KiloLima
The judge excluded statements Akbar made to two sergeants who guarded him after the attack, saying Akbar had not yet been informed of his legal rights.

What the hell?

If I recall, the two NCO's were guarding him (as well as protecting him) and did not question him, alledgedly did not even speak to him.

Any statement made spontaneously is admissable, other than hearsay, regardless of whether one has been advised of their rights.

Or has the liberal, warm-and-fuzzies, birkenstock-wearers been able to influence the content of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

And, lest we forget, this puke is subject to the UCMJ, not civilian law, regardless what his name is and CAIR be damned.

17 posted on 01/31/2005 2:56:42 PM PST by OldSmaj (Jihad this, Islam! Your religion is false and your god is non-existent! Come get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KiloLima
"The judge excluded statements Akbar made to two sergeants who guarded him after the attack, saying Akbar had not yet been informed of his legal rights. "

Judge is an idiot. The guards are not police officers or MP's. . .right?

Therefore, any statement he makes is admissible. But I am no lawyer so what do I know.
20 posted on 01/31/2005 4:19:21 PM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KiloLima
If convicted of two counts of premeditated murder and three counts of attempted premeditated murder, the 33-year-old Akbar could get the death penalty.

That's the good news. I believe the Army recently shifted from hanging to lethal injection. The death chamber used to be in the basement of the Disciplnary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth. Hopefully Akbar will get familiar with it soon.

Part of the delay was that the 101st went into Iraq for a year after the attack. The CG made the call not to try the case in theater as too much of a distraction. The members of a court-martial panel would have had to be taken away from their normal duties fighting the war. Even with the evidence that's excluded, there's plenty to show he did it. The real issue will be the insanity plea.

Since Akbar also made statements that he didn't agree with the war, it seems treason could also have been supported as a charge. He threw the grenade into the brigade ops center not because of some personal vendetta, but in an attempt to disrupt the unit on the eve of its attack.

23 posted on 01/31/2005 5:14:17 PM PST by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson