Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Released Julian Assange Ready For Next Indictment – Espionage Charges In The US
Mediaite ^ | December 16th, 2010 | Matt Schneider

Posted on 12/16/2010 5:45:00 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: magellan
Okay, this web page was actually to try to point out Soros nor the CIA were funding Wikileaks. But the context of the original Jan 2007 email suggests the idea of getting money from either Soros or fleecing the CIA was proposed.

Soros' Open Society Foundations did not contribute to Wikileaks above board, but who is to say there are not laundered contributions (prepaid credit cards funding Wikileaks via PayPal). Just like prepaid credit cards were used to fund Obama's campaign anonymously.

I still have to wonder what was meant by "Soros will kick you out of the office with such over-reaching." I guess the idea is if Wikileaks went to Soros and asked for $5, he would not oblige. Or it means Soros and Assange collaborated on Wikileaks, and Soros would kick Assange out of the kingdom if he overreached during the creation of Wikileaks.

61 posted on 12/17/2010 8:46:21 AM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“He is an opportunist, he releases what he gets, but he is no journalist.”

First of all, who should decide who qualifies as a journalist? The government? The New York Times? You?

Secondly, even if he’s not a journalist, I don’t remember reading in the Constitution that freedom of the press is limited to a certain class of credentialed individuals. I have as much freedom of the press as Willy Hearst did, and I don’t take kindly to anyone suggesting that I don’t.


62 posted on 12/17/2010 11:35:04 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Wouldn’t he have to have committed the acts under U.S. Jurisdiction to be liable? If some foreigner does something in another country what rights does U.S. Law Enforcement have anyway?


63 posted on 12/17/2010 11:37:25 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Freedom of the press and trafficking in stolen information are two different items. You may have the freedom to ‘bear arms’ but you don’t have the freedom to steal a gun and protect your position of that under the 2nd Amendment. You may have the freedom of religion but you don’t have the freedom to steal vestments of a church and use them for your own religious practice.


64 posted on 12/17/2010 11:38:11 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Let’s put it this way, do I have Constitutional protections to take your personal information and publish it claiming protection as a journalist?


65 posted on 12/17/2010 11:39:33 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

“Anyway, Assange and Wikileaks are not themselves “media” entities by any reasonable standard...”

What reasonable standard? Are you implying that if I don’t meet these criteria I have no freedom of the press? If not, how does one go about getting permission to have this freedom?


66 posted on 12/17/2010 11:42:43 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
What reasonable standard?

Well, for one, stealing information and hacking networks to get information would be a reasonable standard to say you are a thief (or spy) instead of a journalist.

67 posted on 12/17/2010 11:43:50 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

That’s a reasonable argument. I don’t necessarily agree with it, but it’s more reasonable that implying the 1st Amendment doesn’t apply because he’s not a journalist. Whether or not he is a journalist is simply irrelevant.


68 posted on 12/17/2010 11:49:35 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

“Well, for one, stealing information and hacking networks to get information would be a reasonable standard to say you are a thief (or spy) instead of a journalist.”

As if “journalists” never resort to shady practices to obtain their stories. Ha!


69 posted on 12/17/2010 11:50:54 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

If there is evidence of Assange hacking government systems he ought to be tried for that.

But calling what he did with the papers from Manning ‘espionage’ is overstating the facts by several orders of magnitude. Manning is most deserving of an espionage trial, Assange, not so much.


70 posted on 12/17/2010 12:08:41 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Cindy isn’t going to be sent for Assange. She is reserved for ex-Dimona employees with scrapbooks for sale.


71 posted on 12/17/2010 12:12:50 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

To: Borges
Think of it like receiving stolen good. The Pfc stole the documents from a diplomatic bag which is literally US SOVEREIGN PROPERTY. Like stealing from the White House then this guy takes possession of what he knows are classified and sensitive materials. Not only is that conversion (theft) it's a literal attack against our interests and security. It may result in folks losing their lives. What do we do to those folks overseas who cause our friends and our personnel to die? We send a Predator and a HELLFIRE to communicate our displeasure.
74 posted on 12/17/2010 12:22:58 PM PST by ExSoldier (Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil: It has no point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: magellan
...Wikileaks is not the media. They are a broker, a middleman. The have negotiated exclusive access to leaked data, rather than just posting it for anyone to download. There are rumors about them buying and selling leaked data. There may be quid-pro-quo for exclusive access to information in returns for donations to Wikileaks.

If they are a buying and selling classified documents that is a crime worthy of prosecuting to the maximum extent of the law. What I had heard and assumed (not a good excuse for me) was that they were posting the information for people to read for free. I have gone to some websites (mostly press) and seen some of the non-classified dispatches, that would just "confidential." In those cases there was no cost for reading anything and they were mostly no big deal from what i could see, but I didn't read many nor did I read anything that was identified as classified.

78 posted on 12/17/2010 1:46:58 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

Are any of the documents he got actually classified? I thought it was all just embassy cables. Perhaps we do send the Predator but that’s not the Death Penalty in the traditional sense of the term. :)


79 posted on 12/17/2010 2:32:18 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Yes you are correct but they are sending al queada money NOW!! We should invade them NOT Iraq.


80 posted on 12/17/2010 4:10:24 PM PST by Benchim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson