Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) So what's the concensus here so far? Do we attack Syria or not?
08/31/2013 | Self

Posted on 08/31/2013 8:42:57 AM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles

Ok, my feeing is if they used Chem Weapons on their own people, or on any other people for that matter they need to be hit hard. The chips fall where they may.

I would error on the side of hitting them too hard instead of too soft.

I'm thinking Reagan would have already done it.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; alqaeda; attack; biggeragenda; chat; chemicalweapons; iran; lies; muslimbrotherhood; nwo; randsconcerntrolls; syria; vanity; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last
To: vette6387
Al Quaida (sp?)

There is no wrong spelling of Al Qaeda in English. Any spelling with Roman characters(our alphabet) is a transliteration of sounds that aren't even close to English or other European sounds. There is no official spelling for it or any other Arabic word. El Kaida is just as good. The vowel sounds change with regional variations and are not even represented in the Arabic script. The "K" or "q" represents any of several sounds in Arabic that would be recognized as "k" in English. Even the "d" is not so straightforward and depends somewhat on regional variations.

Hussein, Hassan, Hosni, Hosseini et al are all the same name.

161 posted on 08/31/2013 10:14:57 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

It’s muzzies killing muzzies, stand back and let them have at it. Let allah sort them out


162 posted on 08/31/2013 10:16:22 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Good afternoon.

There is some evidence that gas from Libya went through Benghazi to the rebels.

That would explain why the 0bama regime would try and cover up the Benghazi fiasco. Do you have two valid sources? If one of the sources is the Mossad, that would be good enough for me. Next up, impeachment.

5.56mm

163 posted on 08/31/2013 10:16:25 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

A rational case could be made for mounting a rescue operation to take out all the Christians and Jews and maybe even the Alawites and Druzes and Dervishes and the dozen or so Fire Worshipers and then nuking the whole place.


164 posted on 08/31/2013 10:17:16 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar; milagro

Exactly so.

We also need to hand out free cell phones to them all of them, and then the NSA can track them.

Track them with DOAg EBT cards as well.

IRS agents armed with boatloads of hollow points may keep the undesirable factions in check as well.

Re-train our local LEO to shoot camels rather than dogs, and they can help out as well. Shoot their sheep and goats and they’ll likely die of sexual frustration, especially if the young boys have all died in the gas attacks.

A Secret Service special ops team can do a stealth attack under the cover of darkness, and set up a Congress and a Supreme Court with our current personnel, ensuring further ruination to the country. The entire ACLU membership, the totality of our EPA apparatchiks, our Media, our gangs, every member of the teachers’ unions and any other public employee union member can all be dropped near the capital as well.

They won’t stand a chance.


165 posted on 08/31/2013 10:20:41 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere
The idea of the USA choosing sides in this fight is absurd. Nukes is the only legitimate reason to go in against any of them and we have forsworn that as a reason. This is actually a civilizational civil war within Islam and the Winner of it, if there is a winner, will have the whole assets of Islam and the assets the West will still be pouring into Islam for oil and "humanitarian" insanity with which then to explode out of the Islamic zone into a renewed Conquest of the world's remaining Infidels. The warfare in the ME right now is simply sorting out which sect will have those assets and which version of Islam is to be clamped down on the rest of the world and which sect will supply the Qalif who will direct it all.

I suspect our own Sultan in Washington has dreams of his own Qalifate to be centered in DC or NYC.

166 posted on 08/31/2013 10:23:59 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

Two mooselimb factions beating each other up? We should park the Navy fleets just off shore and buy them chairs and popcorn to watch the fight. Hell, televise it and charge it pay-per-view!


167 posted on 08/31/2013 10:25:40 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“I say if we do it, have McCain lead the mission.”

No! Keep him the hell away from carriers, he nearly sunk one already


168 posted on 08/31/2013 10:25:50 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
11) With privates like “Chelsea” Manning in our military, we’re likely to be laughed out of the Med.

I think the laughter will be pretty loud, particularly after we threaten them with our combat ladies.

169 posted on 08/31/2013 10:25:53 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Figment

Good point.


170 posted on 08/31/2013 10:26:16 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

171 posted on 08/31/2013 10:27:22 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

No! Let the Arab powers handle it...!


172 posted on 08/31/2013 10:36:12 AM PDT by oldoverholt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

No


173 posted on 08/31/2013 10:37:45 AM PDT by WhirlwindAttack (There is so much I could say. But I'm smart enough not to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keat

This next election is owned by George Soros’ vote counters.


174 posted on 08/31/2013 10:40:10 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
So the new standard is we allow use of WNDs?

You got something against Joe Farrah?

175 posted on 08/31/2013 10:41:09 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

“No he wouldn’t
But you can’t really compare the two because Reagan was a man.”

Best reply yet


176 posted on 08/31/2013 10:41:24 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Since our al is deterrence explain how doing nothing with accomplish that dummy.

Funny you would mention "DUmmy".

Perhaps that website would be more to your liking.

177 posted on 08/31/2013 10:45:09 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles

NO. No upside fir us. Muslim killing Muslims should be encouraged.


178 posted on 08/31/2013 11:23:02 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Attacking the chemical weapons stocks would be disastrous - the chemicals could be spread far & wide.

Attacking military bases & air assets might be more difficult & costly than Obama imagines.

Attacking the Syrian leadership is my preferred attack plan, though I prefer no attack at all.

Still, any attack w/o Congressional approval is illegal or should be.

It's almost a sure thing that Obama will screw this up.

179 posted on 08/31/2013 12:04:56 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Let’s try like hell to stop it from happening here.


180 posted on 08/31/2013 12:26:33 PM PDT by Thorliveshere (I wish I lived in Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson