Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1,600 scientists sign letter opposing Trump’s plan to narrow gender definition
The Hill ^ | 11/01/18 | Owen Daugherty

Posted on 11/01/2018 9:56:43 PM PDT by yesthatjallen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: Trump_the_Evil_Left

These people are supposed to pass as “scientists” nowadays??

Look the weather crap took a dump and well you know, everyones gotta eat...…..


61 posted on 11/02/2018 12:59:10 AM PDT by heshtesh (Brtan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
“There are three genders of jellyfish.”

I had not heard that. What species of jellyfish would that be? I have read that some species of jellyfish are essentially hermaphodistic, that is, each individual has both sperm and egg producing organs. Also that the common “sea nettle” jellyfish of the Chesapeake Bay goes through two reproduction processes, the first (sexual process) producing a plant-like growth, and the second, an asexual process of the plant splitting off the free swimming medusa forms.

Which is all very interesting, but how is it relevant? Human beings are not jellyfish.

62 posted on 11/02/2018 1:01:01 AM PDT by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

In an academic environment, where your position and livelihood depends on not violating political correctness, it’s not surprising that they found that many people who would consent to sign.

Consider the consequences of being asked, and refusing...


63 posted on 11/02/2018 1:02:43 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen; All

It’s called (or should be) The She=He=It movement


64 posted on 11/02/2018 1:05:38 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslin another gem posted in the wilderness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garandgal

So mostly what Jerry Pournelle called the Voodoo Sciences. Predictable.


65 posted on 11/02/2018 1:11:49 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

XY
XX

Science.


66 posted on 11/02/2018 1:32:58 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Join the #nationalprogressivecaucus #MOB and #Resist! just like everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Did Tom Cruise and John Travolta sign this?


67 posted on 11/02/2018 1:37:15 AM PDT by mindburglar (I like spelling it Lazers. It looks cooler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

I take it all of these “scientists” are either political or social “scientists”.


68 posted on 11/02/2018 1:41:37 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

scientists of Cannabis


69 posted on 11/02/2018 1:45:48 AM PDT by dila813 (Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VietVet

“...psychologists and the like are not scientists...”

I beg to differ. I earned a degree in psychology and attended a year of Grad School in Social Psychology 50 years ago. In those days, one of the most carefully discussed topics in the field was “what is it that we can SCIENTIFICALLY study as psychology?” These individuals would have failed that part of the course.

We made a real effort in those days to make the study of behavior (the scientific definition of psychology) as rigorous and fact oriented as physics. I consider myself a scientist; I can’t see how the ‘psychologists’ in this group even got into Graduate School.”

Yes, social scientists tried mightily to apply scientific methods, but the data and variables on which they tried to apply the methods of hard science simply cannot be controlled in the way hard science data can. After taking many courses with professors who kept protesting too much how rigorously scientific and statistical they were being and teaching us to be, when it became clearer and clearer that for the subjects we were studying there are always too many other variables in play, variables they could never be separated out.

I realized that these fields, while interesting, were being misrepresented. They would have been better to just say they were observing behaviors of individuals and groups and providing some insights and tentative generations. These 1,600 are acting out of personal bias, not science.


70 posted on 11/02/2018 2:02:23 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Typo in my post above. The word at the end of the second to last sentence should have read “generalizations.”

I realized that these fields, while interesting, were being misrepresented. They would have been better to just say they were observing behaviors of individuals and groups and providing some insights and tentative generalizations. These 1,600 are acting out of personal bias, not science.


71 posted on 11/02/2018 2:05:23 AM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
More than 1,600 scientists signed a letter denouncing President Trump administration’s plan to narrow the definition of gender to be strictly biological

Well, that’s 1,600 ass hats 🎩 that I wouldn’t trust to tell me what color the sky is.

72 posted on 11/02/2018 2:06:40 AM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Any science that takes any data directly from or about people is or will be politicized.


73 posted on 11/02/2018 2:10:09 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alstewartfan

“Science” has become a joke.

...

Science in the corrupt media and politics is a joke. Real science doesn’t get that much coverage.


74 posted on 11/02/2018 2:34:17 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

For humans, there are two genders. Anything else is an illness or abnormality. It’s not a spectrum.


75 posted on 11/02/2018 2:35:46 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Pure Bs, The gay thing is an abomination to God, all have sinned, but it is time for all to repent and seek the living way of Christ.. Science knows nothing, Man knows nothing, seek God..


76 posted on 11/02/2018 2:38:56 AM PDT by aces
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

I remember a scientist who was very good at electronics who thought he was an expert on biochemistry and insisted Vitamin C could cure cancer...


77 posted on 11/02/2018 2:45:54 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

MSNPC is one of the best ones I have seen.


78 posted on 11/02/2018 2:51:03 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Trump_the_Evil_Left

The opinions of scientists is not science.
You know what they say about opinions. Everybody has one.


79 posted on 11/02/2018 2:51:46 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VietVet

I got a degree in Psych because that was the only Major I could get in what was left after I met Pre Med requirements. It was a 30 hour Major. That said, it included 4 semesters of Stats and a Senior Honors Thesis on Experimental design with Calculus. It was once a rigorous field of study. Some of my professors were grad students of the names in the textbooks. George Gamov actually did perception work with rattlesnakes, if you can believe it.


80 posted on 11/02/2018 2:54:30 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson