1 posted on
04/27/2024 12:50:04 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
To: Lazamataz
Is it in the Bill of Rights or not?
2 posted on
04/27/2024 1:01:27 PM PDT by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
To: Lazamataz
The state’s rationale is, to use a word occasionally employed in such matters, specious. To a wild degree.
3 posted on
04/27/2024 1:02:27 PM PDT by
Ciaphas Cain
(America needs deliberalization like Germany needed denazification.)
To: Lazamataz
The state argued that rifles like the AR-15 are not arms under the Second Amendment’s text... Idiots!
They are absolutely arms. Scary arms they want to ban, maybe, but still arms in the legal definition of things that are carried, aimed, fired and go boom!
Oxford dictionary:
arms
[ärmz]
noun
weapons and ammunition; armaments:
"arms exports" · "they were subjugated by force of arms"
Similar:
weaponry
firearms
guns
ordnance
cannon
artillery
4 posted on
04/27/2024 1:04:32 PM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: Lazamataz
(I use vernacular for efficiency. Split hairs later, please.)
If an “Ar-15” isn’t a GUN, just what IS it?
To: Lazamataz; All
I’m in juxtaposition with regards to a high capacity ammunition magazine ban “in a related situation” in California, where the statwide ban is currently under the court’s review in CA... Duncan v. Bonta is being decided en banc by the CA Supreme Court. I’m not Duncan nor Bonta, just an interested third party needing to retrieve some things from a particular municipal police department.
In related news, Washington State’s Supreme Court just ruled against high capacity ammunition magazine possession by the citizens.
6 posted on
04/27/2024 1:20:34 PM PDT by
freepersup
(“Those who conceal crimes are preparing to commit new ones.” ~Vuk Draskovic~)
To: Lazamataz
Next step, completely ignoring SCOTUS.
9 posted on
04/27/2024 1:32:53 PM PDT by
lurk
(u)
To: Lazamataz
“.....shall not be infringed...”
there is no other particular kind of personal property that is Constitutionally protected
and
there is no other Constitutionally-recognized individual liberty that is so emphatically protected as “shall not be infringed”
“When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master— that’s all.”
11 posted on
04/27/2024 1:34:51 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
(“Politicians are not born. They're excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Lazamataz
Need reaffirmation of Bill of Rights for all citizens in all states. No abborgation upon crossing state lines.
14 posted on
04/27/2024 1:51:54 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
To: Lazamataz
16 posted on
04/27/2024 1:55:21 PM PDT by
CFW
To: Lazamataz
Well, we still will have original assault weapons: ROCKS.
22 posted on
04/27/2024 2:13:10 PM PDT by
Mark
(DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
To: Lazamataz
Colorado is considering an assault weapons ban, insurance for gun owners, etc.
33 posted on
04/27/2024 3:48:46 PM PDT by
taxcontrol
(The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
To: Lazamataz
Fascinating. Then perhaps we can argue that slander from the House floor is not speech and debate as intended by the founders.
37 posted on
04/27/2024 5:23:48 PM PDT by
jimfree
(My 21 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: Lazamataz
41 posted on
04/28/2024 3:51:07 AM PDT by
GailA
(Land Grabs, Poisoned Food, KILL the COWS, Bidenomics=BIDEN DEPRESSION. STAGNATION)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson