Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another great flood: time to build an ark?
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20081113/118296502.html ^ | Nov 13th, 2008

Posted on 11/17/2008 6:50:07 AM PST by TaraP

MOSCOW. (Andrei Kislyakov, scientific commentator, for RIA Novosti) - The world geological community is warning that today's seismic activity on our planet is nothing compared with what's to come.

Over the past three years, Pakistan, for example, has been hit by dozens of earthquakes. In March 2005, 80,000 people died under the rubble there. On October 30, the last time nature went on the rampage, there were hundreds of victims. Tens of thousands of people drowned during an overwhelming Asian tsunami at the end of 2004. China and Afghanistan have been rocked by quakes again more recently.

These natural disasters, which have swept our planet in recent years, indicate that the world has entered an era not only of a political, but also of climatic instability. Most scientists - biologists and environmentalists - tend to blame the human race for the catastrophic climate change on the Earth.

No doubt, the greenhouse effect due to industrial activity plays a considerable role in global warming, but there are other reasons worth considering.

The Earth is rotating around its own axis slower. The International Earth Rotation Service has regularly added a second or two to the length of a 24-hour day in recent years.

This is the main reason, according to Igor Kopylov, professor at Moscow Energy Institute, why the planet - a gigantic electrical machine - has had its energy balance upset. He expressed this viewpoint in 2004. Kopylov is convinced that the Earth has entered the first phase of a global change. A weakening of the Earth's magnetic field was first registered early in the 20th century, and a consistent drop in the speed of rotation, in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

It has been established that when the Earth's rotation slows by one second a year, it releases a tremendous amount of heat, hundreds of times the volume of energy released by human industrial activity.

If we accept that all processes on Earth run according to cosmic cycles, which, in turn, depend on the Solar System's position in our Galaxy, then humankind may be facing another Great Flood.

The Solar System, including the Earth, travels through the Galaxy in spiraling elliptic paths. The cycle time for the larger spiral is 200-210 million years, and for the smaller one, which determines minor galactic cycles, 26,000 years. Correspondingly, half a cycle lasts 130 centuries. This period almost exactly coincides with the date of the last Flood, the occurrence of which was real. The myths and legends of many peoples including that of the Bible recorded the event.

The Flood has been dated rather precisely: at 11,100 BC. If we accept that the civilized society on Earth has been developing for 400,000 years, then this period saw 30 great floods, and we are witnessing the beginnings of the thirty-first flood.

The cosmic cycles are so gigantically long by human standards that they have little impact on the life of people, but the active initial phase of the galactic cycle is of vital importance for the development of civilization. In the view of Russian scientists, the Earth currently finds itself at precisely this point in the cycle.

The transitional process in the electrical machine "planet Earth" can be divided into three phases. During the first - lasting 300 to 500 years - a relatively quick change in the direction of cross current (according to the law of electric machines) will alter the Earth's magnetic field, with the Northern magnetic pole shifting to the eastern part of the Arctic Ocean. This change in the Earth's magnetic field is accompanied by strong magnetic storms, earthquakes and disastrous atmospheric events caused by a change in the circulation of oceanic waters and the atmosphere.

The change in the magnetic field leads to changes in the Earth's ozone layer, which cause abrupt leaps in the biosphere's evolution owing to the altered level of radiation. As the average temperature of the planet rises, ice glaciers begin to thaw, raising ocean levels across the world.

The first, "warm" phase of the transitional period is the shortest and most active. This period witnesses a relatively fast braking of the planet and the release of tremendous amounts of heat, leading to global warming.

In the second phase, the magnetic field will stabilize. The Earth will slowly increase its speed of rotation, and the electrical machine "Earth" will revert to near normal speed. The increased speed of rotation will bring on a cold spell, the ice glaciers will regain their mass, and the oceans will displace their former volumes.

In the third phase, the transitional period will end, the speed of Earth rotation will stabilize, and the planet's energy balance will return to the conditions of previous millennia.

Following the last Great Flood, people began migrating from East to West. Are we now to see a great exodus to the East?

It looks as if we should give serious thought to developing Siberia .


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: blacksea; blackseaflood; catastrophism; godsgravesglyphs; grandcanyon; greatflood; noah; noahsflood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2008 6:50:09 AM PST by TaraP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaraP
The International Earth Rotation Service has regularly added a second or two to the length of a 24-hour day in recent years.

No. They add a second to the year occasionally. The second was defined as 1/86400 of the average day, then redefined as a certain number of oscillations of a cesium atom, but the atomic clocks are more accurate than the original measurements for the length of day. 23 leap seconds have been added since 1972 with another one planned at the end of the year.

2 posted on 11/17/2008 7:10:37 AM PST by KarlInOhio (11/4: The revolutionary socialists beat the Fabian ones. Where can we find a capitalist party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

I have a signed statement from the manufacturer guaranteeing there will never be another global flood.

There is that whole fire thing, though.


3 posted on 11/17/2008 7:11:08 AM PST by kimmie7 (***sigh***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
No. They add a second to the year occasionally. The second was defined as 1/86400 of the average day, then redefined as a certain number of oscillations of a cesium atom, but the atomic clocks are more accurate than the original measurements for the length of day. 23 leap seconds have been added since 1972 with another one planned at the end of the year.

You are correct, and this article is absolute nonsense.

But if the article was accurate, and adding a second was a big problem, just think how bad leap years would be!

4 posted on 11/17/2008 7:13:45 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
The Flood has been dated rather precisely: at 11,100 BC.

The "flood" is a local tribal myth and never happened. The idea that it has been precisely dated at 11,100 BC is fiction as well.

5 posted on 11/17/2008 7:15:53 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
11,100 BC? That's before the world existed according to many Biblical literalists.
6 posted on 11/17/2008 7:35:45 AM PST by KarlInOhio (11/4: The revolutionary socialists beat the Fabian ones. Where can we find a capitalist party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zot; Interesting Times

H’mmm, if this person is correct in the assumption that the slowing of the earth’s rotation is the/a cause of global warming, What will Gore’s response be? Shall we create a massive program to put rockets in space, attached to the earth by miles of cable to be fired to increase our rotation speed back to what it was and thus stop global warming?


7 posted on 11/17/2008 7:41:45 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead (3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaraP

“How long can you tread water?”


8 posted on 11/17/2008 7:42:39 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Tread Water? hmmm a long time if I have some floaties....:)


9 posted on 11/17/2008 7:49:38 AM PST by TaraP (A Big Black Horse and a Cherry Tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
“The “flood” is a local tribal myth and never happened...”

Which locality?
Because “localities” around the globe have ancestral knowledge of the same “myth”...and they are all surprisingly similar.

10 posted on 11/17/2008 8:24:18 AM PST by woollyone ("When the tide is low, even a shrimp has its own puddle." - Vance Havner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: woollyone
Which locality?
Because “localities” around the globe have ancestral knowledge of the same “myth”...and they are all surprisingly similar.

And most cultures are founded near large bodies of water. Floods happen all the time. Ask the residents of New Orleans.

You would think that a flood of the size described would be found archaeologically. It hasn't.

11 posted on 11/17/2008 8:28:35 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

a precise non-answer!

met all of my expectations.
Thank you for that.

=)


12 posted on 11/17/2008 8:35:10 AM PST by woollyone ("When the tide is low, even a shrimp has its own puddle." - Vance Havner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

There is general agreement that the flood wiped out almost all of mankind, but exegetes have for some time been debating whether the flood was globally universal or anthropologically universal (i.e. just flooding all the areas that man lived at the time). Lack of geological evidence for a global flood may argue strongly against the first hypothesis but does not affect the second.

But back to the article...why would the earth’s rotation slowing cause a release of heat? I don’t get that claim.


13 posted on 11/17/2008 9:27:39 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Algore might say we must use rockets, but Obama could require everyone on earth to face east when they fart, thus adding to the rotation speed and saving the planet from global warming.


14 posted on 11/17/2008 9:49:49 AM PST by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
The Flood has been dated rather precisely: at 11,100 BC

How could that be so? According to Archbishop James Ussher of the Church of Ireland, the earth was created on October 23, 4004 BC at 9:00 AM, Pacific Daylight Time.

15 posted on 11/17/2008 9:57:15 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud
Lack of geological evidence for a global flood may argue strongly against the first hypothesis but does not affect the second.

The "flood" occurred during historical times, ca. 4,350 years ago according to biblical scholars, so you need to be looking not to geology but to archaeology and sedimentology for evidence. Sediments of that age have been quite well studied in most parts of the globe, and no evidence of a worldwide flood has been found.

But back to the article...why would the earth’s rotation slowing cause a release of heat? I don’t get that claim.

If the rotational energy was changed by slowing, there would be a release of heat. But the article is wrong in equating a leap second with the earth's rotation slowing by a second. They are two different, and unrelated, things. A leap second is equivalent to a leap year, in which an extra day is added. That extra day does not mean the speed of the earth's rotation has changed in any way; it serves just to adjust our calendar to the true length of the year.

16 posted on 11/17/2008 10:07:08 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
According to Archbishop James Ussher of the Church of Ireland, the earth was created on October 23, 4004 BC at 9:00 AM, Pacific Daylight Time.

The good bishop did not specify a time on that day, but if he had one presumes it would have been Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).

17 posted on 11/17/2008 10:12:30 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

And how do you know????


18 posted on 11/17/2008 10:14:09 AM PST by TaraP (A Big Black Horse and a Cherry Tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TaraP
And how do you know????

The leap second claim is wrong.

How do I know? I don't remember if it was an astronomy course or something I picked up later, but the earth is not slowing by a second a year or anything close to that. A check of the web suggests that the earth's rotation is slowing at a rate of about 0.005 seconds per year.

The leap second is done to adjust our calendar to the actual rotation of the earth.

And this makes the article nonsense.

19 posted on 11/17/2008 10:31:35 AM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Well, there’s quite a few “biblical scholars” out there who do not think with the mind of the Church, and I am of the school that in the face of apparent contradiction we should take an attitude of “hmm, well that’s interesting” and wait a few hundred years to see what shakes out.

A date of ca. 4000 B.C. would certainly suggest (barely) historic times, and current dating in archaeology would lead one to believe Homo sapiens was already dispersed by then. But perhaps there is something fundamental we are missing in this equation—either from a scientific standpoint or an exegetical one.


20 posted on 11/17/2008 10:53:01 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson