Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill would keep U.S. out of world court
WND ^ | 4/12/02 | Jon Dougherty

Posted on 04/11/2002 10:05:23 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-431 next last
To: FF--150
FYI. ;o)
61 posted on 04/12/2002 10:55:09 AM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Bush Blocks UN Tax Plan:

With far more political acuity than critics expected, President George Bush disarmed world government proponents while promising more aid to developing nations. The U.N.'s High Level Panel on Financing Development concluded its four-day conference in Monterrey, Mexico, without explicit authorization for U.N. taxes on currency exchange, fossil fuels and a host of other tax targets.

The conference, publicized as a poverty-reducing initiative, was, in fact, another effort by the U.N. to gain taxing authority. Ernesto Zedillo, head of the U.N. panel, issued a report on June 28, calling for the new taxing authority. U.S. delegates to the conference made it clear that the U.S. would not support any document that included U.N. taxing authority.

The final "consensus" document was toned down substantially, and reference to taxing authority was removed. When the conference opened on March 18, however, delegates from Germany, Britain and other European countries tried to reinstate language to authorize global taxation. Again, U.S. delegates, with help from Japan, blocked the effort.

Then Vincente Fox, president of Mexico, renewed the call for U.N. taxing authority when he spoke to the delegates. The U.S. stood firm, and U.N. taxing authority was excluded from the final document.

Had Al Gore been elected president, the outcome would have likely been different. Gustave Speth, a member of the Clinton-Gore transition team who then was appointed head of the U.N. Development Program, was a strong advocate of U.N. taxing authority, and promoted the scheme during his U.N. tenure.

Bush did even more to confuse the world government crowd. He diffused the anticipated criticism of U.S. aid by announcing a sharp increase in foreign aid over the next three years. European nations made a similar commitment, leading conference officials to claim victory before the conference even convened.

When he spoke to the delegates on Friday, however, Bush made it clear that U.S. aid would no longer be poured down the U.N. rat-hole as it has been in the past. U.S. aid will be placed into a special "Millennium" account, not simply handed over to the U.N. The U.S., not the U.N., will establish the criteria that must be met by developing nations before receiving U.S. aid.

Bush told the delegates that no longer can poverty relief be measured simply by the amount donor nations give. The real measure of poverty relief must be based on the achievements produced by the aid.

Bush made it clear that U.S. aid will go only to countries whose governments exist with the consent of the citizens, that commit to open markets, and that promote the principles of freedom.

U.N. conferences are not accustomed to hearing this kind of talk from a U.S. president. Bill Clinton told the Millennium Summit in 2000 that the time had come for national sovereignty to take a back seat to U.N. activism. Bush invoked U.S. sovereignty by defining the conditions upon which U.S. aid will be granted. And he did it with a smile, and without confrontation.

Castro, on the other hand, spoke to the delegates in his usual "fatigues," with his usual dictatorial bluster, calling U.S. policies "economic genocide."

The Bush administration is clearly changing gears with its U.S. aid. U.S. aid will now be aimed at helping nations build the infrastructure to create wealth, rather than on programs that simply feed global poverty – and enrich those who administer the programs.

This change will not be welcomed by the U.N. bureaucracy, nor by the IMF, that is building a new $250 million palace in Washington to house its expanding bureaucracy in anticipation of becoming the chief administrator of anti-poverty wealth redistribution.

The U.N.'s quest for global taxing authority will not go away. Even though this effort has been thwarted, temporarily, the U.N. can be expected to continue its efforts to get out from under the control of the United States. The World Summit on Sustainable Development, which will convene in Johannesburg, South Africa, next August, will likely hear sharp criticism of the U.S., and more calls for financial independence for the U.N., among the many other agenda items. For now, at least, the world has dodged a bullet, thanks to the Bush administration. Those who believe national sovereignty should be superior to any scheme of global governance cannot rest easy, but instead, must keep a vigilant eye on both the U.N., and the U.S. government. There are plenty of people in the U.S. who do not agree with Mr. Bush's determination to advance the principles of freedom.

Okay, I showed you mine...now you show me where the UN has "joint control" of U.S. lands.

62 posted on 04/12/2002 11:27:08 AM PDT by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SKS Snajperi;davidosborne
"what makes you think he is who he says he is?"

Many FReepers have ample proof that davidosborne served in Bosnia.
From letters and packages sent to him while he was there.
63 posted on 04/12/2002 11:29:19 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Good to see you!
How are things in Long Beach?
64 posted on 04/12/2002 11:33:22 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FireWall
Why are you still posting on THIS THREAD?
Your expertise about the UN is needed on this thread.
65 posted on 04/12/2002 11:45:11 AM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
"This court isn't for the average citizen,
it's so some pissant country can charge high level officials when things don't break their way!!"

I know that, you know that and most FReepers know that.
A select group of FReepers distort the facts so they can defend a known Commie
and cry how unfair it is that a commie is being tried by other commies.
I'd bet President Reagan would have a good laugh if he was aware of this.
Now he was a President who really understood how evil commies are.
66 posted on 04/12/2002 12:02:45 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
There is one exception for cloning---CLONE 535 Ron Pauls for the legislative branch of Gov't
67 posted on 04/12/2002 12:03:23 PM PDT by Ff--150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub

General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

I had the true honor of voting for this man twice!!

68 posted on 04/12/2002 12:15:05 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
"I had the true honor of voting for this man twice!!"

Me too!
69 posted on 04/12/2002 12:18:10 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SKS Snajperi;Nitro
SKS Snajperi did your bike ride help you remember when, where and what Special Forces you helped train for Bosnia?
70 posted on 04/12/2002 12:20:10 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Thanks for the heads up!
71 posted on 04/12/2002 12:21:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
If I described my handle as you do, it would look something like Nitro85-89!!

That means I also had the further pride of being a sailor under President Reagan's direction and I helped stop the Cold War!!

72 posted on 04/12/2002 12:24:44 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
"That means I also had the further pride of being a sailor under President Reagan's direction
and I helped stop the Cold War!!"

Thank You Brother!
You indeed help put the commies out!
SALUTE
73 posted on 04/12/2002 12:30:06 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
ME too, I had the honor of casting my first vote ever in a presidential race for Ronald Reagan, and then I did it again, and I would have done it AGAIN, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN, if I had had the chance. The Gipper was THE GREATEST PRESIDENT of the 20th century. BAR NONE!!!
74 posted on 04/12/2002 1:01:52 PM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: poet;Nitro; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Tumbleweed_Connection; MissAmericanPie; A Navy Vet...
Poet-can we trust the our leaders who ordered the US Military to do this? 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub makes few points that I understand. To be honest I think his posts are always off topic and have little basis in facts.

For an example, I consider the UN court an abomination. Because I consider the UN court an abomination I point out how it is using Kangaroo court practices against Milosevic. Because I defend Milosevic against the UN court somehow he views this as supporting communisim.

If you allow them to use Kangaroo courts against Milosevic we could be next. If we fund these Kangaroo courts like we are doing against Milosevic we become moral hypocrites.

Tonkin is a patriot, but he is not a deep thinker. His patriotisim is flag thin.

75 posted on 04/12/2002 1:02:37 PM PDT by Spar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Hey man, all I really did was watch my RADAR scope and do a little "chip-n-dip"!!

It was Ronbo who made the difference!!

Two!!

76 posted on 04/12/2002 1:05:08 PM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Spar
"If you allow them to use Kangaroo courts against Milosevic we could be next."

You need to actually start at the begining of the thread.
You'll find that
A) Your above statement is not true.
B) You are the 1st and only one to still worry about the fate of the Commie Milosevic.
Why do you worry so much about a commie?
It's not because "we're next"?
77 posted on 04/12/2002 1:07:24 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
Indeed, I was in the Army, and President Reagan was my Commander in Chief, and then Bush senior. Makes me proud that I served under the Gipper!!

And thank you for your service!!
78 posted on 04/12/2002 1:09:12 PM PDT by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
Do you not remember the flap when Bush first took office and did not repeal or negate all the executive orders that Clinton signed in order to bypass the House and Senate? Gale Norton said it would just be too difficult to repeal them.

http://www.wallbuilders.com/resources/Search/detail-php?Resourse/D=44

However, President Clinton has greatly extended the use of Executive Orders well beyond the legitimate scope of internal policy making.

For example, he has used Executive Orders to impose United Nations programs and policies throughout America, resulting in 83 land areas in the United States either being subjected to UN regulatory policies (such as Yellowstone Park) or being declared UN heritage Sites (such as Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia-home of the Liberty Bell and the location where the Declaration and Constitution were signed). Furthermore, through his Executive Order on the American Heritage River Initiative, even privately-owned property has now been placed under federal control.

"There are currently 47 Biosphere Reserves and 26 World Heritage Sites within the United States, giving foreign entities control over land owned by the Federal Government and private citizens. The only authority for this control and transfer of private and public land is executive order. United States Representative Helen Chenoweth, (R) Idaho, testified before the House Committee on Resources on June 10, 1997 where she stated, "over 51 million acres in the United States have been designated by the United Nations as either World Heritage Sites or Biosphere Reserves." These "approximate an area the size of Colorado, our 8th largest state.

"Also disturbing is that designation of Biosphere Reserves rarely involves consulting the public and local governments. In fact, United Nations Educational, Scientific (UNESCO) policy apparently discourages an open nomination process for Biosphere Reserves. The Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention state: 'In all cases, as to maintain the objectivity of the process, State (national) parties should refrain from giving undue publicity to the fact that a property has been nominated (for Biosphere Reserve designation) pending the final decision.'"

I think I remember the EO number being Executive Order 13112. I don't remember the article on FR about the U.N. signs already being in place at some National Park he visted or the author visited.

79 posted on 04/12/2002 1:09:43 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Ditto. The greatest President I'll ever know in my lifetime.
80 posted on 04/12/2002 1:10:45 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 421-431 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson