Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Connectedness,' Not Spanking, Best Way to Raise Kids, Says Author
CNSNews ^ | 4/12/02 | Jason Pierce

Posted on 04/12/2002 6:13:53 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Another academic with no kids.
21 posted on 04/12/2002 7:16:41 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm not passing judgement on how other parents choose to raise their kids (assuming no outright abuse). But personally, I have a strong-willed three year old daughter that has never been spanked, and she is doing just fine. I believe there are better ways to discipline kids than hitting.

It takes a lot of patience to raise a kid without spanking, but I believe that the results are worth the extra effort.

22 posted on 04/12/2002 7:24:07 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
..."I think [spanking] is harmful, and it teaches the wrong thing-that 'might makes right"....

WRONG, Dr. Alexander---your premise of "I think" is WRONG--you did not think! You daydreamed up some bilgewater liberal idea and regurgitated it to write a book.

...""Parents are spending less and less time with the children and often have turned to drugging the children to control their behavior," Alexander said"....

Well, DUH, Dr. Alexander--this idea certainly wasn't initiated nor enforced by parents at large--another liberal concept from head shrinkers such as yourself.

..."They don't provide the time, affection and love the children need. There is a basic need for that -- a concerned, close, affectionate, trusting relationship with parents. And you can't do that by hurting, by control, by rules, regulations and threats," he said"....

There are many parents who do not provide for their childrens' emotional needs--could a part of the problem be with fedgov's assertion of nannystate do all/be all/end all have anything to do with this crisis? Fedgov's nannystate where two parents aren't important to the health and well-being of children?

And finally, Dr. Alexander, you are simply full of shit if you think that 'hurting, control, rules, and regulations, and threats' aren't an important factor in child rearing......take your 'if it feels good, just do it attitude' and shove it--YOU ARE A BIG PART OF THE PROBLEM!

23 posted on 04/12/2002 7:31:20 AM PDT by Rowdee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Maceman
But personally, I have a strong-willed three year old daughter that has never been spanked, and she is doing just fine.

If she is genuinely strong-willed, good luck. You are still at the beginning of this particular road. Watch out for tight curves ahead.

Some of us have guided children all the way through the road to adulthood. Many of us also said, "I will never have to spank this child," and discovered otherwise. Others have said, "I will never spank this strong-willed child; there are better ways," and now regret the vow.

But you may beat the odds. Good luck.

25 posted on 04/12/2002 7:33:01 AM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The Jihad Johnny method of child-rearing. No thanks Dr. Stupid.
26 posted on 04/12/2002 7:35:02 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Trying for "connectednes" or "reasoning" with very young children is impossible, and frustration at this failure can lead to abuse. A little whap on the back of a toddler butt can be very effective, esp. with those plastic diapers, it sounds much worse than it feels ! I spanked my children rarely but it was enough to let them know I meant business and it got to the point where all they needed was the "evil mom-eye" look to straighten them out. My teenagers (and even the 21 year-old) still won't mess with me if I give him that look !

We've probably all had the pleasure (not) of watching a timid, afraid to discipline parent trying to reason with their out-of-control, screaming brat-child in a store or restaraunt. As soon as I hear them speaking in that sing-songy "now sweetie, you don't want mommy (or daddy) to feel sad" type voice, my brain screams !! Of course the kid wants mommy or daddy to be sad, they want mommy to be sad enough to give in and buy them the toy or candy or whatever it is they want NOW !

27 posted on 04/12/2002 7:39:00 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Discipline, punishment, rules and regulations all mean that there is lack of trust and confidence."

Discipline and punishment should not be used interchangeably. Punishment inflicts pain - discipline builds character.

Both have a place in raising children. Punishment "imposes a penalty on for a fault, offense, or violation". Whether that comes from a swat on the fanny, a "time out", or loss of privilege, it comes as a result of willful disobedience.

Every child is different. My daughter would utterly wilt when confronted with her disobedience. She only needed spanking 2 or 3 times.

My son was not as easy. He suffered a few more spankings.

Discipline is "training that corrects, molds, or perfects the mental faculties or moral character". My children were disciplined on an ongoing basis, and are now 2 of the finest people I know. At 18 and 21, I only wish I had been half the person they are now.

29 posted on 04/12/2002 7:42:19 AM PDT by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

This reminds me of the words of my mother when I used to wimper over something.

"I'll give you something to cry about".

That usually shut me up double time, but if not, I got more than a spanking.

And thets nootttttthing wong wiv me!

31 posted on 04/12/2002 7:45:10 AM PDT by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Crunchy Jello
Wah-hah -- yes it's me -- and shouldn't you be doing something more constructive with your time ??
32 posted on 04/12/2002 7:47:04 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Another failed 60's child-rearing theory from a leftist idiot.

"San Francisco-based clinical psychologist Dr. Theron Alexander explains his theory of "connectedness" in the new book."

Yes, the men are always "connecting" with the boys in San Francisco.

35 posted on 04/12/2002 8:19:01 AM PDT by moyden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The relationship with the child is damaged by conflict, and if you say to the child, 'I love you, I care for you ... and I'm going to hurt you,' this doesn't make any sense, ...The child does not understand it. Discipline, punishment, rules and regulations all mean that there is lack of trust and confidence." Dr Moron Alexander

Of course there is a lack of trust and confidence! Trust is earned by obedience. How can you trust a child or be confident that a child will do the right thing if you have not trained them to do so? You can't. Children come into this world with pure self interest and nothing else (If you doubt that man has a sin nature, observe two-year olds!)They have to be trained. And training sometimes requires correction. Willful defiance requires strong correction.

Unfortunately, most libs want to treat children like they're little adults. "If I can just explain it to my 3-year old, then they'll understand and do the right thing." Balderdash and popycock! I have seen some friends try to do just that and watch them then negotiate with the child before giving in and allowing the child to do what he wanted. They are training their child allright, but training him in defiance and rebellion.

With adults, action follows belief, so explaining to an adult may work. With small children, belief follows action, so you have to train their external actions to formulate their internal beliefs so that when they mature, you can then reason with them.

Training does require consistency on the part of the parents, however. Many parents only spank when they have had enough. Depending on the state of mind of the parent, the boundary moves, confusing the child. Children who have fluid boudaries are insecure and always testing those boundaries, because their world is also constantly changing. Children who have firm boundaries are secure in those boundaries and will only test them once in a while to make sure that they are still there and that their world has not changed.

Bill (father of 3).

38 posted on 04/12/2002 8:44:35 AM PDT by Warhammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Parents who oppose the CPS anti-spanking stupidity should check out my web page: http://www.geocities.com/cp_prosecutions/spanking.html
39 posted on 04/26/2002 11:56:02 PM PDT by cherrycapital
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson