Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

University Study Finds Conservatives More Outrageous than Liberals
A Semi-News/Semi-Satire from AzConservative ^ | 12 Feb 2011 | John Semmens

Posted on 02/13/2011 2:13:18 PM PST by John Semmens

A study of political “vitriol” conducted by Tufts University Assistant Professor of Sociology Sarah Sobieraj and Professor of Political Science Jeffrey Berry found that political talk has become nastier over the years on both ends of the political spectrum. However, in the judgment of the researchers, those on the right have gone further over the line of civil discourse than those on the left.

“Using mainstream thinking as our baseline, it is clear that conservative commentators go beyond the accepted norms both more frequently and to a greater distance than liberal commentators,” Sobieraj said. “Take, for example, the assertion by many conservative commentators that President Obama is a socialist. None of the mainstream media have described him in such a way. Further, the president himself has denied he is a socialist.”

“In contrast, former President Bush never directly contradicted accusations that he is a Nazi,” Sobieraj observed. “And, truth be told, many of us in academia find this very telling. When you add in his approval of water board torture, the charge has an element of truth that must be seen as an offset to the inflammatory tone of the charge.”

Coming at the issue from a slightly different angle, Professor Berry emphasized the perspective of the victim of the nasty talk. “More flat out ‘outrage’ has been expressed by the targets of right wing hate talk,” Berry contended. “If we count the number of times people say they are outraged by a comment, the overwhelming majority of the time it will be a comment from the right side of the spectrum. So, if conservatives are outraging more people more often then it stands to reason their commentary is more outrageous.”

read more...

http://azconserv1.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/dems-oppose-blocking-federal-funding-of-abortion/


TOPICS: Government; History; Humor; Politics
KEYWORDS: academia; outrage; satire; stupid; vitriol; wasteoftime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2011 2:13:20 PM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

What a load of cr@p!


2 posted on 02/13/2011 2:15:53 PM PST by 95B30 ( The Professional Left: "Their morals are crooked, their logic is flawed, their honor is stolen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

As though there’s nothing to be negative about.


3 posted on 02/13/2011 2:17:54 PM PST by equaviator ("There's a (datum) plane on the horizon coming in...see it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 95B30

It’s satire.


4 posted on 02/13/2011 2:18:01 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Ed Schultz
Keith Olbermann
Lawrence O’Donnell

vs

Charles Kurthammer
George Will
Phyllis Schlafley

And the Left represents civility?


5 posted on 02/13/2011 2:19:08 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (BO + MB = BOMB -- The One will make sure they get one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
..When you add in his approval of water board torture, the charge has an element of truth that must be seen as an offset to the inflammatory tone of the charge.”

Oh good grief. Pouring water on some terrorists face is somehow compatible to Hitler? No bias there... not..

6 posted on 02/13/2011 2:19:38 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

...oops, never mind, I once again fell for Satire..

This site is too good.. so close to reality yet satire..


7 posted on 02/13/2011 2:20:41 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Good satire, but again too close to the mark to be satire.

I have noticed this too, for a long time. Dems don’t see hate speech from their side of the aisle, because they agree with it, or think its funny. Its true, in their view, and therefor can’t be outrageous. What we say, in their view, is outrageous because it can’t be true; even if it is true, its outrageous and should not be said. Because its about them.

Which is why I don’t waste my breath calling for “civility”. If your opponent sees everything you say as uncivil, and can say the most outrageous things without batting an eye because, well, in their view its true, then forget civility. Lets just have the debate, let the chips fall. And if debate is impossible, then lets just get it on, and defeat them. Some people you just can’t talk to so you just have to defeat them.


8 posted on 02/13/2011 2:22:13 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
Using mainstream thinking as our baseline

Even though this is satire, that pretty much nails the left's mindset. Left=mainstream

9 posted on 02/13/2011 2:24:06 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

I think I missed that at first then went back. unfortunatly i know many liberals and this is exactly the sort of thing I hear..alot.


10 posted on 02/13/2011 2:26:01 PM PST by 95B30 ( The Professional Left: "Their morals are crooked, their logic is flawed, their honor is stolen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

There joking right?


11 posted on 02/13/2011 2:30:33 PM PST by MsLady (If you died tonight, where would you go? Salvation, don't leave earth without it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

“Using mainstream thinking as our baseline....” means using University-approved mainstream thinking. No matter how emphatically they might like to pretend, such a baseline is skewed against mainstream America.


12 posted on 02/13/2011 2:33:17 PM PST by AlwaysThinking (Pray, Christian 2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

To quote that famous American, Homer Simpson...”D’oh!”


13 posted on 02/13/2011 2:33:26 PM PST by AlwaysThinking (Pray, Christian 2 Chron 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Mere verbal opposition from conservatives qualifies as “hate speech.”


14 posted on 02/13/2011 2:41:46 PM PST by Elsiejay (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
1). A study of "political vitriol".
2). Associate Professor of Sociology.

That says it all.

15 posted on 02/13/2011 2:48:11 PM PST by Spirochete (Sic transit gloria mundi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Thanks. I aim to please.


16 posted on 02/13/2011 2:49:51 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Ya got me for the first two paragraphs, John. From the comments, ya got several Freepers entirely.

Well done.


17 posted on 02/13/2011 3:11:01 PM PST by piytar (Obastard is a use of the term "bastard" in the literal sense -- Obama is hiding his daddy's identity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
University Study Finds Conservatives More Outrageous than Liberals

Isn't that equivalent to Satan conducting a survey and asking his follower what they think about God and his followers?
18 posted on 02/13/2011 3:29:43 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spirochete

Tufts is a mediocre school, with both teachers and students of mediocre intelligence. It is where the New England elite send their village idiots.


19 posted on 02/13/2011 3:31:01 PM PST by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Apparently not satire, unfortunately: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-left-meaner-political-discourse.html

and

http://ase.tufts.edu/polsci/prospective/OutrageIndustry.pdf

Sad what passes for academia now.


20 posted on 02/13/2011 3:33:30 PM PST by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson