Posted on 06/11/2012 5:41:04 AM PDT by plenipotentiary
Both Barack Obama II and Stanley Ann Dunham are invented personas.
A male child was born, probably son of Malcolm X and an unknown woman possibly Jo Ann Newman (per Martha Trowbridge). The childs father knew his days were numbered so to protect his only son he arranged with his Muslim and Communist contacts, to have him brought up in Indonesia under the protection of President Sukarno. He was a member of the Presidents extended family and under the direct protection of a high ranking Indonesian special forces officer, Pak Lolo Soetoro (which was probably not his real name). Soetoro did have a wife, and Obama believed her to be his mother, but she was not.
Sukarno was removed from power in March 1967.
In 1971, Obama II was moved to Hawaii, at that point the character of Stanley Ann Dunham was created (the birth certificate they use is illegible and that indicates that it does not support the created identity, and therefor everything after that in her story is also false) to allow a connection with communist agents, the Dunham family, and allow Obama II to be mentored in Communism by Frank Marshall Davis. The Dunhams probably had a son called Stanley Armour Dunham Junior (fate unknown). They initially changed the first names to Shirley Ann, and then ridiculously to Stanley Ann Dunham. SAD was never in Seattle, Why would she go to University there and take a night school or correspondance course)
Obama I was introduce briefy as Obama II's fake father. There probably was a real son of Obama I, but he was sidelined (maybe the Roman Obama who was stranded in KGB training school in Moscow)and the person we now know as Barack Obama II took his identity.
Obama II is a creature of the KGB and the Muslim Brotherhood, who both share aims to impose their way of life on the USA.
I can guess the answer to who’s next, but I prefer not to even imagine that possibility.
I think the worst thing about Trowbridge is her ability to present theories without the slightest shred of evidence. Her stories don’t hang together from one to the next. Since her blog is now protected, nobody can prove that; but it’s nevertheless true. The timelines don’t fit. It’s a waste of time to bother to read her exclusive finds when there’s no way to replicate or verify her information. Teases are the tactics of Alinsky acolytes, yellow journalists, or tabloids. Research the woman herself and you will find some interesting attributes.
I don’t think it would be the hillary because she is looking ‘over the hill’, she would have the constant distraction of the bill degenerate the sick media would be clamoring to hear from, and the globalist power mongers want a younger more malliable shill, kind of in the frame of an alternate little barry bastard who would be less inclined to default to the communism at his core since he would not have a history of communist upbringing and assistance. Look to a democrat governor with as yet a low profile, or perhaps a working secretary of state for a bluish state.
Private investigators don’t generally alert the subjects of the investigation as to their findings and the tracks they’re following. Kind of like telling the enemy your plans, routes, and so on. Makes total sense to me. 0thugga’s hires are all over FR and these threads in particular. Anything posted here is known by them right away, that’s why so many original sources have been scrubbed within hours or even minutes in some cases, of having links posted on FR.
Well and truly stated ... and those bastards think nothing of erasing a person or family to protect their positions of power.
thank you for thread!
Does the pic of SADO with pearls and sweater appear anywhere in that UofWA yearbook?
What does the pic metadata say?
It would be interesting to see the page with surnames beginning with “O”.
One thing that stands out immediately: she is starting a cult. This is clear due to the attitude she instills in her followers toward (2) anyone who disagrees w her/them, and (2) any facts or evidence that contradicts her theory. She is inculcating her acolytes [great word, btw; props] against any info that might inform them of the weaknesses/inaccuracies in her theory. Once she has them b u l l e t-proofed against any intrusion of actual facts, she has them for life.
I don’t know about any cult or, especially, having people “for life;” but it doesn’t take much looking to see that her continually changing stories don’t fit together. It’s not as if she writes as speculation or hypothesis. She writes as if it’s fact. Good luck analyzing her work; unless you register, you won’t know her latest offering.
I did find the absence of Trowbridge videos on Youtube odd. She has a radio show, correct? I wonder why no one has recorded segments from it and posted them. I really wanted to hear her voice, and listen to the way she speaks. I didn't get that opportunity, regrettably.
Sorry, your theory doesn't wash with me.
You're not talking about Arpaio and his investigation, are you? You did say "private" investigator.
Are you avoiding the questions about phoning the Mercer Island libraries?
BTW, what do you mean by "original sources"?
An original source, in my mind, is something physical, not something posted on the web as opinion, speculation or outright lie.
It would physically exist outside of the Internet and couldn't be "scrubbed". Only its reference on the Internet could be scrubbed.
You are right.
Plus screencaps and printouts of the online version of the original source can be kept. (Find point in time where they agree with one another)
Then if the online info gets scrubbed, there’s a backup to a) prove the material and b) show the scrubbing.
You forgot to explain why you’re trying to construct a narrative to make Barry an NBC. Give it up, Obot.
See post 359 ... if you need help comprehending what is written there, seek help. And take your medication, you’re starting to babble irrationally.
In addition to his other motive, he seems to be trying to get the thread pulled and to make real researchers and serious posters look crazy.
By original sources I meant both physical data and sources available on the internet, both kinds. Both kinds have been deleted, scrubbed, pulled, etc after info about them appears on FR or other sites.
This has happened numerous times.
For instance, the example of the fact that no library or archive owned by the Honolulu Star Bulletin contains issues of the newspaper that allegedly had the birth announcement. Although apparently they used to. Or the DOH evil clown stuff. Or libraries in other places. There are numerous other examples.
Ummm...why would a “private” investigator wait all of this time to divulge the information to their client?
And as explosive as such information could be what client in their right mind wouldn’t want to ‘cash in’ (euphemistically speaking of course) on such information once it was known?
The subject, or rather subjects, of the investigation is the guy in the White House and everyone connected to his real identity and those who helped provide cover and lies to promote the fake identity. Obviously ongoing research, if made public, would alert these subjects to the avenues being looked at, how much is known, and so on. Leading to the erasure of information, and perhaps real harm to some people.
The “clients” - there are none, that would mean someone is paying for the research. The research is being done as a public service, and results are shared with those who can and are doing something about it. It is ongoing.
Sorry, your theory doesn’t wash with me.
It’s not “my theory”, it’s the simple truth, very simple and obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.