Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
In Jerome Corsi's WND January 25, 2011, article he notes Zero's apology to Ortega, hoping he's not being blamed for "something which happened when I was three months old."This incident has presented as sunken wreckage hazarding Zero's navigation.
Here is Michael Beschloss' IQ "off the charts" who's just listened to the Sandinista daughter-molester (a forty-page deposition) do a pale Castro imitation (Fidel could do six hours standing on his beard) and there can be no question as to the incident.
The Bay of Pigs invasion of April 1961 torpedoed the Kennedy presidency as per Dulles' design, and it lit up JFK in the eyes of the Brigade as a "traitor"--
--while Fidel Castro used it to extort a ransom, cash, jeeps, a promise of no invasion, a humiliation in his view.
It brought the firing (November 1961) of Dulles arguably the most significant and dangerous DCI since its 1947 inception under a Truman beset with buyer's remorse.
There is no way POTUS fails to know the date--it is cast in the ingot of his historical position.
It elicited the unfortunate "shatter it (CIA) into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds" remark by a president whose head went that way instead.
"My Muslim faith" has told us he was born in January 1961.
Or he is less than average in intelligence.
I don't insist on either, but there is no allowance for "slip of the tongue"--
--not when Ortega ranted for a full hour and Zero responded at his liesure after reflection.
Making April Fools Day 1960 his inception.
Apt for an ass so sophomoric as to presume to continually lecture us on how the cow ate the cabbage.
Yeah, that Bay of Pigs and three months old reference is not a “brain fart”. I assume that’s the b’day he used most of his life.
The object of the exercise was to ask freepers what they could see - we followed the Class of 1960 students from grades 7, 8, 9 at the East Seattle School and then Grade ten at Mercer Island by picking out some faces, and then identifying some of them in the so-called 1960 ‘no sweater’ image. Some of the names are now confirmed by the Maraniss image - there were no names available until that appeared -
and the question was, WHERE IS STANLEY ANN DUNHAM?
The mystery is that although she’s shown in a cropped image wearing sweater and pearls, which is presented as a graduation image, there’s nothing on a page anywhere that tells us WHEN she attended Mercer Island High School.
The ‘no sweater’ image appears to suggest that yes, she was there in 1960 if we can believe the names-caption, if we can believe she did qualify to have her photograph taken without her sweater, if we can believe she was the only one who thought it NOT worthwhile to hold the same pose as the the other girls...etc.
He's married to Michelle and owns property in Greenwood Drive IL.
Yes indeedy.
Well, he did say the characters in “Dreams” are sometimes composites... He obviously meant the main character as well!
That's hilarious! And now we have BUNCHES (pun) presented as ancestors of the Dunhams...and what's this JOHNSON got to do with it? JOHNSON was the family name of MAYA ANGELOU.
The man was clearly insane, 'black prince' or not, his mother was institutionalized and so should he have been, evil genius, ex con, bi-sexual specimen, advocated a Mau Mau for the USA. Planned to take his case for reparations to the UNITED NATIONS.
You can't go around using someone elses name and birthdate most of your life and then forget all about it.
That “fatherhood” has been thrown around here a couple times!!!
Where have you been???
So what you are saying is that SAD either 'slept' with an ugly old black 37 years older than herself or Stanley Armour Dunham brought a coloured baby home for Madelyn to look after, like a stray cat?
Because he sure as h+ll doesn't look like the kenyan student...and there are no other candidates, right?
To: Brown Deer; PhilDragoo; little jeremiah
FWIW it seems Martha is less interested in research than 'she' is in stirring up a controversy...but she did, in her original postings, refer to ERIK RUSH and he's an author, who has apparently contributed to WND.
In one of her articles she posted an image of a woman holding a child of whom she claimed she was showing you a photograph of the mysterious JOANNE Newman with her baby, the son of MX.
We traced that image to an archived copy of the publication MUHAMMAD SPEAKS (page 18) and discovered the issue in which that image appeared was printed in April 1962. The speech MX made during which it's claimed that photograph was taken was at a venue during the previous FEBRUARY. THE CHILD APPEARS TO BE HOW OLD? Only problem, how to tell when that photograph of mother and child was taken?
It's a photograph without any context, it might as well have been taken months before...and that girl identified as Joanne Newman looks suspiciously like Stanley Ann Dunham, although it's from the back of her head.
Nanny Dunham. You remember her don't you? Showed up with a baby at Susan Blake's and didn't know how to change a diaper? And that's the last time Susan saw her...and no one heard about her again in Seattle until someone found ANNA OBAMA listed in the directory.
264 posted on Sunday, 5 August 2012 9:45:23 AM by Fred Nerks
Crossposting for the record too.
I’m wondering about that SAD sighting with the still pinkish baby and not knowing how to change diapers. Made up out of whole cloth or partially true? Could SAD have stopped by on her way from there to here or here to there, with the child she was hired to care for? From what I’ve read and hopefully absorbed (some of), she was not taking care of Zero as a brand new baby, and why Seattle.
Regarding stirring trouble (muddying the waters?) a lot of bloggers/authors are doing that. Interesting. And I am not referring to anyone on FR (shoes fit can be worn, not pointing any fingers), just the increasing number of books like Maraniss’ and then Cashill’s pushing FMD as the father, and of course SAD the mother; I am disappointed in him, I thought he’d have better discernment.
I did attempt to reply, a very long, complicated response, but I had to sit there forever waiting for the a result when I pressed PREVIEW - which, when it did register, showed me that half of the text had been removed.
So I sent you a message by another means.
Short and sweet, you’ve got it. She showed that child to Susan Blake for a reason. She then took off, and Susan said she never saw her again.
That was fine until someone found the address for ANNA OBAMA.
They had to turn her into Stanley Ann Dunham.
Well, actually what he might have told Ortega is that the birth certificate that he had been calling his own, the one that belonged to the original BHO2, showed a birthdate of January...1961. PROBABLY THE EIGHTH.
Maybe because he's been using that date most of his life, so it stuck in his mind. August 1964 came much later, when the myth had to be tailored to suit the arrival of SAD in Hawaii so she could meet the kenyan, fall in love and have a baby...
whoops..correction...meant to write August 4, 1961. Stupid.
Something about FMD!!!
Hmm. So it looks as though (correct me if I’m getting it wrong) that SAD did bring the baby Zero who she was hired to take care of through Seattle (for a reason - to appear as the mother?) and was never seen again there by “old friends”. So I assume “Dreams” didn’t mention that visit since SAD never actually lived there with Zero, just passed through.
And then the Zero team was shocked when the “Anna Obama” showed up in the directory and had to create a backstory.
There was no Seattle in the story after high school as far as I know, (I lost my searchable copy of Dreams, it’s no longer available for download without registration)there was no University of Washington, there was no baby-sitter. I think it starts with they moved to Seattle so she could finish high school, and the next thing we know she’s in love and she’s married to the kenyan...and people started asking questions about where the happy little family lived, then she shows up with the baby to show it to Susan, and then Susan says she’s gone...Dreams says they lived happy-family-until-he-was-two years old...and then the kenyan abandoned them. Another says that Stanely Ann went to look for him in Boston - but that was a year before he left Hawaii. Stay tuned.
There’s one layer of lies in Dreams, then another layer from the obots who tried to fill in the holes, and now we have a number of books each with their own layer of lies.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Frank_Marshall_Davis
KEYWIKI - TREVOR LOUDON’S RESEARCH SITE. IF YOU HAVEN’T GOT A KEYWIKI LINK, YOU’RE NOT SERIOUS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.