just for you...but she's going to say that Mark Davis looks just like the baby...and wouldn't it be funny if that's who it was? I mean...after all, it's the ONLY BABY PHOTO THERE IS!
Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailypen.blogspot.com ...
Exactly.
Let me list a few comparisons.
Zero - short upper lip, FMD - very long upper lip (meaning distance from nose to upper lip).
Zero - more or less standard to slightly prominent chin, FMD severely underslung or receding chin.
Zero - longish, not very “African/Negro” looking nose, rather narrow. FMD - very wide, very “African/Nergo” looking nose, short too.
Zero - average forehead, FMD - very high forehead.
Zero - moderate to narrow lips; FMD - extremely wide (thick) lips.
Zero - rather narrow face even as a child, pointed chin; FMD very round to oval face, wider at the jaw than forehead, very different shaped face.
I see no resemblance whatsoever other than they are both male human beings with ad admixture of negroid ethnicity, but obviously Zero has less of that admixture.
FOR THE RECORD:
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/tree2annotated.htm
9c I0539 Alaric Edgar Hubert Bomford (also known in his attestation papers as Alex Boyne or Alexander Edward Boyne), b 19 Sep 1918 at Brisbane, Queensland, d 8 Feb 1991 at Perth, WA, m I0540 Doreen Betty Loxton, b c1928 at Loxton, South Australia d 9 Jul 2002, and had issue. After military service (Australian Second 4th Pioneer Battalion, North Africa and Tarakan Island Borneo, medals), he met Doreen, settled in Adelaide and drove a tram.
10a I0541 Thomas Joseph Bomford, b 29 April 1955, Adelaide, South Australia m(1) I0589 Leesa Anderson, and had issue
11a I1340 Emily Rae Bomford, b 27 Apr 1992
11b I0590 Clinton Mark Bomford, b 27 Oct 1993
10b I0541 Thomas Joseph m(2) I1181 Jane Franz, b 1955
10c I0542 Evan Michael Bomford, b 1956, m 1978 I0592 Nicole Levinge, b 1956, divorced 2003
10d I0543 D a v i d J e f f r e y Bo m f o r d, b 10 April 1959 at A delaide, m 28 Nov 1981 at Somerton Park, South Au stralia I0546 Amanda Jane Sandover, b 1959, and had issue
AND THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR DAVID JEFFREY BOMFORD WAS SHOWN ON THAT PART OF THE BOMFORD FAMILY TREE. AND DUE TO THE KERFUFFLE, HE REMOVED IT.
So the question is, was the document accessed through the British archives or was it accessed from the family tree webpage. There may be cause to question, depending on if access was through the British archives, AND WHEN...if this may have been a core document for the document presented as a birth certificate that accomapnied the application for a divorce in 1964. What was created and presented as a joke MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SO FUNNY TO START WITH.
just for you...but she's going to say that Mark Davis looks just like the baby...and wouldn't it be funny if that's who it was? I mean...after all, it's the ONLY BABY PHOTO THERE IS!
Thank you! Yes, that baby photo could be FMD’s son for all we know. The photo of FMD’s son in the middle bears a very strong resemblance to his father, for sure.
WELL KNOCK ME OVER WITH A FEATHER...
What a hoot that would be, they didn’t have a photo of baby zero, so they used one of FMD’s little boy.
LOL!
And now I’m calling it a night.
I want to see the same diligence and commitment to research and documentation to back these “Catholic Social Services/Connecticut connection” points up as has been given to the other points of information (ss#, selective service, photoshopped pix, articles about”kenyan born”, etc.) that have been uncovered by the other researchers on these eligibility threads. What I am asking is, “show me”. Then I will take what Sven says more seriously.
Nah...I doubt it, there's one thing missing that Mark Davis hasn't got that zero has had all his life, and that's the dark band of colour across his forehead.
I suggest you go to his home page, read that, then click on IN FORUM and read what he has been trying to tell us for a very very long time.
That is an interesting thought. That baby photo always sort of bothered me; didn’t look Zero-ish.
Sven, I am now taking much more seriously your comments. I admit I got annoyed a little when you didn’t provide any documentation; yet the details you provided were so consistent and exacting, that it was hard to think they were made up.
Now with the datelines and info about what was going on in Indonesia presenting on this thread, the puzzle is falling into place very clearly.
yes...BUT the baby has that dark band of colour that most of the other zero images do have...even the little ‘David’ who can’t possibly be zero because someone here doesn’t like the idea...HAS IT!
there's that dark band across his forehead...and the baby has it too.
You will find the instructions on how to obtain the information on his home page.
My first impression of that baby picture was spitting image of FMD.
Now how is anyone 100% sure that that baby photo is of obama jr?
The color photo you use for comparison is inappropriate. There’s a B/W photo of FMD looking to the side which would be more appropriate. That’s the one I thought of when I saw the baby photo.
The “dark band of colour across his forehead” you refer to, would that be called a “shadow”? Depending on the lighting, that band would appear or not.
The lighting on the baby is from above causing shade on the shape of the forehead. If the lighting was fully frontal, there would be no dark band on his forehead.
FOR THE RECORD:
See
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg.
Someone posted this elsewhere:
I wanted to see if I could find any images of similar documents from Kenya around the same time period that could be compared to the certificate on the web. I spent several hours with Google image search on that before I decided to broaden my search outside of Kenya-specific documents.
It was some time later that I finally spotted a thumbnail on one of the results pages that looked very much like the Kenyan certificate. I pulled up the full size image and found that it was virtually EXACTLY the same type of document.
It was a scanned image of a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth” dated in 1964 for a David Jeffrey Bomford on a genealogy website for the Bomford family. Except that David Jeffrey Bomford wasn’t born in Kenya, he was born in South Australia. But what was even more interesting was certain other features of the document as compared to the Kenya certificate.
The names of the registrar and the district registrar were the SAME NAMES as given in the Kenya certificate save for the first initials, i.e. G.H. Lavender and J.H. Miller in the Bomford document versus E.H. Lavender and M.H. Miller in the Kenya document.
Also, the book number (44B) and page number (5733) were the exactly the same on both documents.
The image of the Bomford certificate seems to prove beyond any doubt that not only is the Kenya certificate a fake, but that whomever faked it used the Bomford certificate as the template.
SO THERE YOU GO...UNLESS DAVID JEFFREY BOMFORD FAKED HIS OWN BC THAT HE PLACED ON THE BOMFORD FAMILY WEBSITE, THERE’S THE ORIGIN OF THE DOCUMENT.
And here it is, a link to the document David Jeffrey Bomford placed on his family genealogy website, and then removed:
http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/bomford.jpg
I guess that's because they've both got fat cheeks?
Now how is anyone 100% sure that that baby photo is of obama jr?
We have already discussed we cannot be sure, that's what we have been led to believe, that's all.
The color photo you use for comparison is inappropriate. There’s a B/W photo of FMD looking to the side which would be more appropriate. That’s the one I thought of when I saw the baby photo.
I went back and looked for a colour photo of FMD and couldn't see one. Are you sure you don't mean Mark Davis, his son?
The “dark band of colour across his forehead” you refer to, would that be called a “shadow”? Depending on the lighting, that band would appear or not.
I'm going to have to ignore that observation coming from someone who apparently can't tell the difference between the father and the son.
The lighting on the baby is from above causing shade on the shape of the forehead. If the lighting was fully frontal, there would be no dark band on his forehead.
Yet most of the childhood images show it, so he must have spent a lot of time in the shadows...btw, there are a number of FMD images upthread, you migh find the one you were looking for by scrolling back a little...
RE: post 475 - In the left image there is a distinct shadow behind Lolo and BO’s head, and the left (on the pic) couch chair, not behind SAD or the right of the couch. In the right image, what appears to be cut out of SADs hair may in fact be a shadow pattern that is consistent with that by BO.
More pieces to the puzzle...Wish I’d read my pings before reading frmail...You’ll get the drift when you read yours. sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
