Obama: 'A New Vision Of An America In Which Prosperity Is Shared'

President Obama: "Too many folks still don't have a sense that tomorrow will be better than today. And so, the question in this election is which way do we go? Do we go forward towards a new vision of an America in which prosperity is shared?(continued)

Four more years of Obama’s half-baked communalism (for the benefit of Blacks, illegal aliens and union members only), and America will look like a cross between Russia and the Central African Republic.

Exactly as planned. What I do not understand is how so few people actually recognize this almost 4 years later.

Obama is a marxist, pure and simple. His grandparents, who raised him, were marxists. His mother and "father" were marxists. His grandparents went out of their way to enroll his mother in the only openly marxist university in the country at the time. His "mentor," arranged by his marxist grandfather, was a marxist. His adopted father was a marxist. He was raised by feral marxists in the wild. He married a marxist. He has associated almost exclusively with other marxists. He began his political career at the home of a marxist terrorist who not only remains free, but is also responsible for shaping young minds at a major American university. He attended a marxist, anti-white "church" for twenty years. He was a member of the marxist New Party in Chicago. He has surrounded himself with other marxists during his stint in the White House, from advisers to unconstitutional appointees to supreme court justices. His policies and those of his appointees are clearly marxist in nature to anyone who has a lick of sense and even a cursory knowledge of Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto. He and his marxist wife immediately upon occupation replaced all of the books on liberty and republican government in the White House library with books on marxism, maoism, and a post-American world (his reputed favorite, by the way). He and his marxist wife hung marxist and maoist ornaments on the White House Christmas tree.

Why is it in any way surprising to so many people that the smiling jackal in the White House is suddenly acting like a "socialist?" Why was it in any way shocking when this same jackal, whose entire life is the story of other people opening the right doors for him, openly claimed that government is the font from which prosperity flows?

Why is it in any way surprising?

Why, indeed.

The press and the academic community, in particular, share an inclination to self-deception about the trends of history based on the happy illusion that Mankind is progressing toward some sort of millenium or Ideal State; perfection of society (as if such a thing could even be defined, let alone engendered) as a substitute for perfection of the soul, which has been the ageless basis of all true religion.

Lenin saw this early on, and required his followers to eschew religion in favor of the worship of The State, with himself as G-d.

Thus the beliefs of society’s intellectuals became almost infinitely malleable, to the point where nothing had any fixed meaning anymore.

We see this now with the situation vis a vis marriage; any and every idiot who walks the planet knows what a marriage is, and yet, if the Marxists can redefine political terms to mean whatever they like, then why shouldn’t homosexuals take a page from their playbook?

This is the essence of political correctness - define the terms of the discussion and restrict the terms allowable to the opponent.

In this way, the campaign to redefine a simple English term has become so well established, that everyone now debates whether we as a society should allow “homosexual marriage” - tacitly yielding the point that such a fictional entity could even exist.

It cannot, but no one even thinks to make the point anymore.

In this way, all traditional values are eroded and lost, with the ensuing and perfectly predictable social chaos; the very chaos Marxists depend upon to revolutionize societies - invariably downward toward failure.

However, it is a failure they can exploit in order to gain power.

To be a Marxist is to live by such distortions, and when you’re in the habit of lying to others, it becomes quite natural - indeed, an ingrained habit - to lie to yourself, as well.

And that is precisely why so many people don’t look at what Obama does or consider what he says; they look only at what he “intends” - the habit of lying to themselves is so ingrained that they they give him credit for all sorts of things which simply are not there.

I have been saying this for four years now. God bless you for your frank honesty that so many Republicans can’t seem to muster.

Why are we Republicans and the right in general so afraid to speak what is documented truth about who we now have as president?

Why is it taboo to say we have a Marxist in the White House?

Why don’t we hold Obama to task for HIS history?

And why don’t we have an honest discussion about communism, what it is, what it means, and what we will look like if we go down that road that the left is attempting to label as something else (progressiveness, liberalism, etc..)????

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.