Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BARI SHABAZZ CLASS OF 1978
classmates.com ^ | Jan 20,2013 | classmates.com

Posted on 01/20/2013 10:05:44 AM PST by ABrit

BARI SHABAZZ CLASS OF 1978 Stuyvesant High School New York, NY Class of 1978 Member Since: Dec 11, 2011 9 people have visited this profile.

(Excerpt) Read more at classmates.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; History; Politics
KEYWORDS: birther; naturalborncitizen; obama; shabazz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Boogieman

The random guy from Jamaica had an arrest warrant issued in Hawaii on the May 5, 1982, bearing number “BWO 050582.”

A prosecutor on April 9, 2003, (21 years later and just before Obama stood for Illinois Senate) filed an ex parte motion to recall the bench warrant and announced on the record “nolle prosequi.” This is a Latin phrase which is formally entered into a court record which means that the prosecutor in a criminal case “will no further prosecute” the case.

Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?

If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy. That’s why the warrant was quashed and Bari Shabazz’s legal existance terminated.

Obama had two or more parallel ID’s running.


21 posted on 01/21/2013 12:41:22 PM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

“Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?”

Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?

Any of those would make more sense than that they “quashed” the warrant to protect Obama, when the warrant wasn’t in Obama’s name, so he had no danger of being arrested under it.

“If Obama’s legal name and person was Bari Malik Shabazz he “Obama” was in criminal legal jeopardy.”

Well, he wasn’t, so there was no jeopardy.


22 posted on 01/21/2013 1:25:10 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
DNA tests would settle the big questions.
Who is his daddy? Who is he?????

Smells like half/half black/white Kenyan born, Xed by Malcolm, changing name aliases as commie organizers, terorists did way back.
Now in power running country (down) and paving way for United Kalifat States.

23 posted on 01/21/2013 7:16:49 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepisssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.


24 posted on 01/22/2013 2:28:06 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.


25 posted on 01/22/2013 2:28:06 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

Wouldn’t there be a mug shot of him when he was arrested?


26 posted on 01/22/2013 2:44:25 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

Freedom of information request would find out?


27 posted on 01/22/2013 3:51:55 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

“Well if Shabazz was finger printed when arrested and Obama had the same prints, then Obama was in danger of arrest every time he was fingerprinted.”

I really doubt that Obama has the same prints as some random guy from Kingston, Jamaica.


28 posted on 01/22/2013 6:05:31 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Under U.S. law the fleeing felon rule was limited to non-lethal force in most cases by Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). The justices held that deadly force “may not be used unless necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.”

Fleeing felons may be followed into places not open to the public without a warrant if the officer is in “hot pursuit.” See Warden, Md. Penitentiary v. Hayden (1967), [2] 87 S.Ct. 1642, 18 L.Ed.2d 782.


29 posted on 01/22/2013 7:15:43 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Also, Interstate Flight is a felony against Federal Law.


30 posted on 01/22/2013 7:18:26 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
“Why did the prosecutor quash a warrant on a nobody from Jamaica?”

Maybe he was dead? Maybe he cut a deal with the prosecutors? Maybe they do that automatically after a certain time with minor warrants, rather than clogging up the system?

Any of those would make more sense than that they “quashed” the warrant to protect Obama.....


They wouldn't know he was dead, there's no reason to suppose they "cut a deal", I doubt if Courts cancel warrants for "failing to appear" under any circumstances relevant here.
31 posted on 01/22/2013 7:50:49 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

“They wouldn’t know he was dead”

How do you know that? Maybe they cross-reference with the SSDI database, it wouldn’t be very hard to do.

“there’s no reason to suppose they “cut a deal””

It’s a more reasonable supposition than any of yours.

“I doubt if Courts cancel warrants for “failing to appear” under any circumstances relevant here.”

Is there a statute of limitations on “failure to appear”, or the original charge? It’s very likely that they cancel warrants after the statute has run out, since there would be no point to chasing people who you cannot prosecute.


32 posted on 01/22/2013 8:09:37 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Maybe they cross-reference with the SSDI database, it wouldn’t be very hard to do.”

Even if they did, which I doubt, his death was never verified.

Is there a statute of limitation on failing to answer a warrant and interstate flight and falsifying a death record? Ask a lawyer or Google.

You seem very interested in Obambi not being a Shabazz don’t you?


33 posted on 01/22/2013 8:21:41 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

Ah. I see it now. Obama/Shabazz was badly injured in the car crash. They used Saudi influence to get him treated at the CIA hospital at Quantico, thats why Shabazz’s address is changed from Elmhurst, New York, to Quantico.

Obama couldn’t produce a driving licence in that name because he wasn’t using that name, and the only license he had was was in the name of Bari Malik Shabazz, of New York.

Hi couldn’t be fingerprinted because his fingerprints were on the FBI wanted list.

He didn’t have a driving license in the name of Obama, because he couldn’t get one. No birth certificate.


34 posted on 01/22/2013 8:54:29 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

The CIA wanted him in Pakistan. He spoke and wrote Arabic with a good accent. They sent him to Pakistan to liase with the Taliban.

Now where does Stanley Ann Dunham fit in in Pakistan. She was a CIA asset and that was her false identity? That’s why the spooks keep visiting anyone who publishes anything about Obama and SAD...


35 posted on 01/22/2013 9:07:43 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Obumpa


36 posted on 01/22/2013 9:26:44 AM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

“Even if they did, which I doubt, his death was never verified.”

I don’t think anyone pays too much attention to whether something is “verified” in the SSDI. If the SSDI lists someone as dead, most organizations take their word for it.

“Is there a statute of limitation on failing to answer a warrant and interstate flight and falsifying a death record? Ask a lawyer or Google.”

I don’t need to, I know that there is a statute of limitations on pretty much every offense short of homicide, so it’s just a question of how long the statute is on those other charges.

“You seem very interested in Obambi not being a Shabazz don’t you?”

Hey, since I’m about the only one interested in your thread besides you, you shouldn’t look a gift horse in the mouth. I just wanted to let you know that you were on the wrong track, but you keep posting replies to me, so I have responded. If you don’t want to hear from me, then stop pinging me.


37 posted on 01/22/2013 12:30:23 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Regardless of the applicable statute of limitations, the period may be extended or the running of the period suspended or tolled under a number of circumstances such as when the accused is a fugitive..”

“..no statute of limitations shall extend to any person fleeing from justice,” 18 U.S.C. 3290)”


38 posted on 01/22/2013 1:15:29 PM PST by ABrit (awordinyourear.blogspot.co.uk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

The USC is Federal law, it doesn’t have anything to do with crimes under Hawaii state law. Here’s what I found on Hawaii:

http://statelaws.findlaw.com/hawaii-law/hawaii-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html

It looks like in Hawaii, the statute of limitations for “misdemeanor or parking violation” is 2 years, and “petty misdemeanors” are 1 year, and the warrants on Shabazz would have fallen into one of those categories.

Now, the statue in Hawaii does get suspended, in these circumstances:

“Continuously absent from state or no reasonably ascertainable residence or work within the state, while prosecution is pending: maximum extension 4 yrs.”

So, that reads to me that the maximum it could have been extended was 4 years. Add 2 years to that for the maximum statute of limitations for his violations, and after 6 years, Mr. Shabazz should have been in the clear, as far the state of Hawaii was concerned.


39 posted on 01/22/2013 3:49:20 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ABrit

Not buying the whole scenario, but suppose he was in bad accident with injuries. That would explain the strange scars on his head.


40 posted on 01/22/2013 7:41:26 PM PST by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson