Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: The Liberal God Dies Again
Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog ^ | Wednesday, December 04, 2013 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 12/04/2013 10:44:15 AM PST by Louis Foxwell

Wednesday, December 04, 2013

The Liberal God Dies Again

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog

The god of liberalism is an idea and ideas are notoriously fragile things. They fall apart once they make the transition from the ivory tower of the mind to the mud and dross of reality. Every writer and artist has had the experience of holding a perfect ideal in his mind only to lose it as he struggles to set it down on canvas or paper. The creative process is that recognition that the ideal cannot be made real.

Liberalism, progressivism and the various names by which the modern left identifies and is identified is the belief that the ideal can and must be made real. That anything short of the ideal is a savage state of repression, tyranny, patriarchy, fascism and the whole litany of crimes against ideal humanity.

The liberal god rises as an idea and dies again. And rises again. No matter how many times the whole thing ends in blood and bankruptcy, the worshipers return to worship the coming of the god again.

"People in every corner of the globe who saw in him a hope for the future and a chance for mankind. We weep for our children and their children and everyone’s children: For he was charting their destinies as he was charting ours," Art Buchwald wrote in the International Herald-Tribune after the assassination of JFK.

In Buchwald's crude Stalinist panegyric, JFK was a deity who charted the destinies of the whole world. "He cared about all of us," he writes. No sparrow could fall but that JFK would see it. JFK would help the "Negro", the "working man", "the artist, the writer and the poet",  "teachers and pupils" and even "old people".

But John F. Kennedy the man with flaws and strengths is not present in the North Korean scale orgy of leader worship because it isn't really him that Buchwald is mourning. It isn't Kennedy the man that liberals weep for every year. It is liberalism.

Camelot is liberalism. The death of Kennedy was the death of the idea. Liberalism didn't die, but its best avatar did. The ideal became the real with a magic bullet. The man who was supposed to chart the destiny of the world couldn't save himself from a "single lousy Communist" who killed the hope that he was supposed to represent.

The god of liberalism vests in an avatar like Kennedy or Obama. The avatar is messianic. It is superhuman. Its empathy is unlimited. Its liberal godhood elevates us all by merely being in its presence, hearing it speak or reading one of its speeches. It is the idea made flesh. The secular god.

But the god of the left must die. It is a mad illusion to think that any man can chart the destinies of the world. Buchwald put far too great a burden on JFK. Had a lousy Communist not killed him, then, like Obama, he would have lived to disappoint and infuriate his followers.

The Russians went mad when Stalin died. The North Korean weeping was equally insecure. When you believe that your destiny is charted by a man who is the only hope for your future; what can you do but weep, not for him, but as Buchwald writes, "We weep for the millions of people who are weeping for him."

The ideas of the left always fail because the avatars and muses always fail. The ideas that seem so bright in theory fail when confronted with the actual task of charting human lives and the unpleasant reality that the Negro, the working man, the old people and the students may not want the same things that the idealists want for them.

For a golden moment, the avatar of liberalism makes it seem as if all things are possible, he weaves an enchanting spell of transcendence that promises that paradoxes can be reconciled and that people will set aside their "selfish" needs and interests. They will stop thinking of themselves and start thinking of what they can do for their country. They will become the change they were waiting for.

The progressive ideal is that all men and women will become avatars of the liberal god in the same way that what we think of as Communism was only meant as a temporary system of rule that would give way to the true Communism in which there would be no more need for rulers and secret police because each man would be a true Communist with no need for external pressure and coercion.

Instead of this golden age, the tyranny of the avatar grows, coercion increases, protests spread and the project decays into a totalitarian state or is overthrown. The golden age never arrives. The ideal is slain by the real. And the true believers go into mourning for what might have been.

The tyranny of the ideal is the most brutal of all tyrannies for men and women are not ideal; they are real. Its plans are bound to fail and yet it has such a passionate grip on the minds of its believers that it is bound to rise again and again.

And so this cycle of the liberal god who dies and rises again, dies and rises, keeps repeating. As long as the tyranny of the ideal remains a rallying cry, as long as men and women choose to believe that a better world can be created through central planning, forcible redistribution and mass reeducation then the cycle will continue. No matter how often the liberal god dies, he will rise again.

The secular god of the progressive ideal has become an entity of life, death and rebirth. Its failures only incite its followers to believe that it will come again. It does not matter how many gulags and mass graves lie in its wake. It is a matter of faith. And in a secular world, there is nothing left to believe in except a better world.

Obama is dying now. ObamaCare, his great work, has failed. Like Ra and all the others, he will pass into the darkness and the ideas will reemerge again in a new avatar. Perhaps it will be Elizabeth Warren. Or someone else. And it will not be remembered that health care nationalization does not work. Like Communism, it will only be another experiment that was carried out incorrectly.

Men are flesh and blood. They are born and they die. But ideas appear to transcend them. That is what attracts men to ideas. Even the worst of them carry the taste of immortality on their lips.

"Alone--free--the human being is always defeated. It must be so, because every human being is doomed to die, which is the greatest of all failures. But if he can make complete, utter submission, if he can escape from his identity, if he can merge himself in the Party so that he IS the Party, then he is all-powerful and immortal," O'Brien declares in Orwell's 1984.

And so the messiahs come offering transcendence through submission to the Party. But they die and they fail, and the Party, that ugly confused creature with a million mindless heads, a trillion talking points, and no soul, looks around for a new avatar to embody its secular religion.

A man who will call for the submission of the world so that the world may become the Party and the Party may become the world.

"'We are the priests of power, god is power," Orwell tells Winston. This is the liberal priesthood of community organizers and activists, NGO chiefs and talking heads, senate aides and prattling pundits who wait for a god who will justify their power and their cruelty, who will convince them that their immortality within the body of the Party is within reach.

And then he dies and they appoint another avatar to embody the progressive godhood and wait again for their community organizer god to be born anew.

This liberal avatar will care for the Negro, the working man, the artist, the poet and writer, the teacher and the pupil, he will "save us from war", "command" us and "chart the destinies" of the whole world. He will do what he was unable to do in any of his prior reincarnations-- he will make the ideal into the real, he will make the impossible ideas of the left finally work.


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: greenfield; sultanknish

Sultan Knish/Daniel Greenfield Ping List notification of new articles.

FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Sultan Knish ping list. I highly recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

1 posted on 12/04/2013 10:44:15 AM PST by Louis Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I no longer buy that liberalism, progressivism or any of the leftist nonsense was ever idealistc or utopian. It’s just the snake oil they peddle to get people to forfeit their liberty and property. Stalin and Lenin never intended to bring peace and prosperity to their citizens, nor did Marx or Mugabee, or Castro or our own dear leader.

It’s the fairy tale they recite ad nauseum. It’s the sheepskin they wear to calm those they wish to subjugate. We conservatives really need to stop romanticizing the left as though their rhetoric is sincere.

It is not. It never was and never will be. As long as conservatives continue to believe them rather than their own observations, we will lose. Being unwilling to call a liar a liar gives the liar license to lie and complete credibility.


2 posted on 12/04/2013 10:55:42 AM PST by gspurlock (http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

“The god of liberalism is an idea, and ideas are notoriously fragile things. They fall apart once they make the transition from the ivory tower of the mind to the mud and dross of reality!”

The reality is very simple: “Liberalism doesn’t work, never ha, and never will!


3 posted on 12/04/2013 11:05:55 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Obamaganda is starting to fail 24/7. Soon Obamaganda will fail 24/365!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

The substitution of state for church, of politician for priest, of government for God, these are the sources of human evil. Hubris is the human effort to become god. It is, in reality, the human as demon. Atheism is demonic. Government without subjugation to God is demonic. Only in the presence of God is the balance of man in nature achieved.
Man without God believes he controls the environment. So he requires all manner of environmental tinkering every aspect of which leads to greater imbalance.
Man without God believes he is the source of compassion. So he requires acts of sacrifice that end in the slaughter of innocents, the greatest holocaust in the history of the world.
Man without obedience to God is the source of all evil.


4 posted on 12/04/2013 11:12:47 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

That was depressing.


5 posted on 12/04/2013 11:13:38 AM PST by Excellence (All your database are belong to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock
I no longer buy that liberalism, progressivism or any of the leftist nonsense was ever idealistc or utopian. It’s just the snake oil they peddle to get people to forfeit their liberty and property.

There are the "Buyers" of utopia, and there are the "Sellers".

There's a reason so many buy into this nonsense. A fundamental difference in their character that makes them susceptible vs. a conservative character.

Liberal "buyers" IMHO, are fundamentally insecure. There is no "Rock" at the foundation of their belief system. Their foundation is "relative", uncertainty is promoted and they are left to be exploited by the Sellers.

6 posted on 12/04/2013 11:20:53 AM PST by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
The tyranny of the ideal is the most brutal of all tyrannies for men and women are not ideal; they are real. Its plans are bound to fail and yet it has such a passionate grip on the minds of its believers that it is bound to rise again and again.

Those believers are also too passionate to realize that it isn't other people who are killing their utopias; other people who are, while the believers have the ability to do so, punished severely for not fitting into the Procrustean bed of the fantasy. Perfect socialism required the New Soviet Man, who did not exist and could not be created. And yes, they'll try again.

7 posted on 12/04/2013 11:30:19 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

We simply must refuse to allow libtards to continue their nefarious and dangerous practice of hijacking and twisting our language, the most pernicious example of which is their application of the term “progressive” to themselves.
Here’s a question for those of you who somehow escaped the government school indoctrination process with your critical thinking skills intact: When these people say “progressive”, to where or to what do they propose to progress?
Among America’s founding documents is the Declaration of Independence. Because many of you younger readers may not have been exposed to the Declaration in school (or, worse, were exposed to an altered or redacted version of that document), allow me to remind you of THE key principles upon which the Founders established this nation:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Read those words until you fully grasp their meaning.
Let me again ask the question: To where or to what do those who call themselves “progressives” propose to progress? How IS IT POSSIBLE to “progress” beyond those beautifully stated and, at that time as today, seldom articulated truths?
Back when a “journalist” respected truth and honesty, the Baltimore journalist Henry Louis Mencken declared “The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”
And, that, my friends is another truth of which we all must be mindful as these so-called “progressives”, by their tendentious torturing and twisting of the language, seek to move us AWAY from our founding principles. Their agenda seeks to take us BACK to some form of the same dictatorial RULE under which nearly all men who walked the earth before those American ideals were set to parchment lived as SLAVES!
If these people wish to wear a label, let it be an honest one. Although I can think a any number of things to call these cretins, my most polite suggestion would be “REGRESSIVES”.
Dick Bachert
11/30/2013


8 posted on 12/04/2013 11:36:38 AM PST by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock

This piece was brilliant. It is written through the eyes of the sheeple, this is why they march in lock step with every hope and change hustler that comes along. Conservatives don’t fall for this nonsense but the “masses” do.

This describes my former neighbor to a T. He just thought Obama cared so much that he would make everything right in the world. Of course I told him it was all a dream but he fell for it, the gullible do, that is why it keeps coming back, embodied by a new leftist.

In order for us to win we have to inform the gullible that utopia is not attainable on earth and anyone telling you it is only wants your wallet.


9 posted on 12/04/2013 11:41:42 AM PST by Lets Roll NOW (A baby isn't a punishment, Obama is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Lib/leftists believe in the perfectability of man. As all conservatives know, while man should try to be everything he can, man cannot be perfected. And that elemental fact drives liberals crazy. They simply cannot believe or understand that humans, unless they are held back by systems like communism (the leftist religion) fail mostly by their own efforts. Many people fail in the U.S. everyday by their own imperfections.

But liberals refuse to believe this. They want to believe people are defeated by abstract, unprovable things like institutional racism, white privilege, wealthy greedheads, the "system," etc. That's why they're leftists. Their theories will always fail, and they'll always be miserable. But one thing you've got to hand them, they never give up.

10 posted on 12/04/2013 11:53:09 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
For communism to work, people must be transformed into complete altruists, who will work for the joy of working and the benefit of society.

In real life, most people work in order to get paid, to get the means by which they can accomplish whatever personal goals they have. If you take away the reward of "pay", then you take away the incentive to work. If I get paid the same as somebody who is half as productive as me, then I will work half the day, and socialize the other half, and still get my quota done.

11 posted on 12/04/2013 12:00:47 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Leftism is not a high ideal, it is tyranny. Tyranny and oppression is what leftists dream about at night, it is what they put on their Christmas list every year.

It took a world war to stamp out NAZISM and Japanese Imperialism. We did not do that by killing all the Germans or Japanese, we did that by destroying the idea of naziism and Japanese Imperialism. These ideas were discredited.

This is what we never did to socialism or Islam and this is what we will have to do to them eventually.


12 posted on 12/04/2013 12:06:26 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Hubris is the human effort to become god.

exactly.

Left to their own efforts, without power, humans who want to be God will fail and die. Those who refuse to move from the couch but expect to eat, would starve. It is the state that robs others to feed him that allows them to continue their imaginary Godhood.

Just one tiny example

13 posted on 12/04/2013 12:10:02 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Leftism, whatever you want to call it, is the political expression of the religion of Humanism.

Humanism is Satan’s “alternate truth” that he offered up to humans in the Garden.

Think about it, “liberalism” exactly follows the lies told by the serpent:

God’s Word isn’t trustworthy,
God isn’t good, isn’t trustworthy,
there will/should be no consequences,
and you can decide for yourselves what is good and evil.


14 posted on 12/04/2013 12:15:30 PM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
For communism to work, people must be transformed into complete altruists, who will work for the joy of working and the benefit of society.

imho, the main problem plaguing the altruists is a basic misunderstanding of the human condition - that is, that mankind has a "sin nature". If you miss this most basic aspect of human nature, all social policies are doomed to failure.

It is not society that corrupts and defines pristine mankind. Rather it is the amalgamation of sinful souls - and their efforts to transcend their sin nature (or not) - that defines society.

15 posted on 12/04/2013 12:27:42 PM PST by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gspurlock
Self-piety is the most seductive drug the mind has ever known.

Fear them - they believe - unto their death or yours - they believe.

16 posted on 12/04/2013 12:34:56 PM PST by Aevery_Freeman (Remember who the real enemy is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Excellent article! Thanks for posting it.

I worked with Soviets in the mid 80’s. Their altruistic sinless system brought about the existence of “knock-knocks,” the name given to people who would spy on/report other people in order to get little perks or protection for themselves. Then of course, 10% of the population of the USSR were members of the Communist Party and therefore received privileged access to stores and goods not available to the other 90% who were the servants of communism, but not invited to join the Communist Party.


17 posted on 12/04/2013 12:54:44 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
I believe this is simply the punishment for violating the prohibition in the embrace of false gods. At that point G*D becomes silent and the end result always leads back to the smoking chimneys of Auswitz.

Today we can envision instead smoke rising from what remains of the cities after the single flash.

Thank you for your posts. They are always thought provoking.
18 posted on 12/04/2013 11:44:33 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Yes. I am reminded that Clinton’s legacy included 9/11. I am dismayed by the horror of Obama’s likely legacy. Impeachment will not be sufficient to repay the cowardice and duplicity of this malicious man.


19 posted on 12/05/2013 4:26:02 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson