Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are They Planning To Use ‘Russian Interference’ As An Excuse To Invalidate Trump’s Election Victory?
The Economic Collapse ^ | 12/11/16 | Michael Snyder

Posted on 12/12/2016 4:08:45 AM PST by Enlightened1

It has been said that nothing happens by accident in politics, and it is certainly no accident that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, members of the U.S. Senate and the mainstream media are all suddenly buzzing about “Russian hacking” and “Russian interference” in our elections.  Over the past 48 hours, the Washington Post, the New York Times, and just about every other major news source in America has been breathlessly telling us that the CIA has concluded that the Russians “intervened” in the presidential election with the specific goal of helping Donald Trump win.  The implication is that if the Russian interference was significant enough, it could have “unfairly” altered the outcome of the election and thus Donald Trump’s victory was not legitimate.  And if his victory was not legitimate, that opens up all sorts of possibilities for the Democrats.

For those that have been wondering if the establishment was going to attempt to steal the presidency away from Donald Trump before he can be inaugurated, we now appear to have our answer.

There are several ways that this could work, and we’ll take it one step at a time.

On Friday, we were suddenly assaulted with all sorts of headlines about how the U.S. intelligence community has concluded that the Russians interfered in the election and that they did so with the intention of helping Trump win.  The following example comes from CNBC

 

(Excerpt) Read more at theeconomiccollapseblog.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; excuse; globalist; hillary; invalidate; obama; russia; trump; yourblogsucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Enlightened1

Invalidate? No. They can’t invalidate the election. But this will be the Democrat version of the birther hoopla and they’ll use it to try and question Trump’s legitimacy.


41 posted on 12/12/2016 5:38:10 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: broken_arrow1

When it comes to McCain, I curse his inactive melanoma.

Where’s painful skin cancer when you need it???


42 posted on 12/12/2016 5:40:48 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: deport
Is all those voting machines connected to the internet in some way?

Nope.

If not how did [Russia] manipulate the votes in each machine across the fruited plain?

They didn't. It's all fabrication.

I'm all for the push to ban fake news. We need to start with the Ministry of Propaganda Media.

43 posted on 12/12/2016 5:42:22 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP LIED TO ME!!!! ....He said I'd get sick of winning.... AND I'M NOT SICK OF WINNING YET!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

What’s odd about all this is that they are touting Russia as the biggest enemy of the US, when, in fact, it is the various Muslim entities in the middle east that are the enemy of both Russia and the US. They are the cancer that will destroy western civilization if not eradicated.

Look at what’s happening in Europe!


44 posted on 12/12/2016 5:42:52 AM PST by meyer (There is no political solution to this troubling evolution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
The people advocating this are emotional children.

Unfortunately those children cannot understand the Sampson option so they do not know enough to avoid it and their wicked masters just want to watch the world burn.

If you want peace prepare for war!

45 posted on 12/12/2016 5:44:10 AM PST by infool7 (The ugly Truth is just a big lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

The Constitution was set up to protect STATE sovereignty, not Congressional Districts. Let’s just leave the voting the way it is until there is a Constitutional Amendment (for me to oppose) that changes it.


46 posted on 12/12/2016 5:54:29 AM PST by oldplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

I did the same thing. Told my wife “I don’t think the elites (Demoncrats/Republicans/liberals/globalists/etc) will let him take office. She said, “oh that’s silly, the election is over.”
I pray it goes smoothly, I don’t believe that it will.
We will see... keep your powder dry.


47 posted on 12/12/2016 5:58:29 AM PST by pajama pundit (NFL: it's OK to take a knee to disrespect the Flag, but "God forbid" you take a knee to honor God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

They’re throwing everything against the wall hoping something will stick. Whaaaa, we aren’t accepting the election results! If nothing works, they’ll at least have tainted Trump’s presidency and will continue with their mudslinging for the next 4-8 years.


48 posted on 12/12/2016 6:16:33 AM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arlis

Arkancide.


49 posted on 12/12/2016 6:17:41 AM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

The US constitution has no mechanism to invalidate the vote of the electorate


50 posted on 12/12/2016 6:18:08 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump-a-licious

And that articles authpr is atupid


51 posted on 12/12/2016 6:18:55 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: struggle

True that


52 posted on 12/12/2016 6:21:04 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pajama pundit

You wrote: “I did the same thing. Told my wife “I don’t think the elites (Demoncrats/Republicans/liberals/globalists/etc) will let him take office. She said, “oh that’s silly, the election is over.”
I pray it goes smoothly, I don’t believe that it will.
We will see... keep your powder dry.”

I totally agree. They need to triple Trump’s security detail.


53 posted on 12/12/2016 6:21:52 AM PST by killermosquito (Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: oldplayer; cynwoody
The vote should be by Congressional District. One electoral vote per CD, plus the two extra for winning the majority of a state's CDs, or the state's popular vote in the event of a tie in CDs. Such a scheme would serve to contain vote fraud. And, being automatic, it would eliminate the need for the likes of Suprun.
The Constitution was set up to protect STATE sovereignty, not Congressional Districts. Let’s just leave the voting the way it is until there is a Constitutional Amendment (for me to oppose) that changes it.
The same could be said of the Senate - but the 17th Amendment “fixed" that. Now senators represent the people of their respective states, not the states themselves.

With the advent of computerized gerrymandering tools, the state’s congressional delegation is more representative of the will of the state government than are the state’s two senators. And given the pro-Republican natural “gerrymander” effect of the relative concentration of Democrats in cities (where any reasonably compact district will, from a gerrymander perspective, be “too safe” for a Democrat), the state governments and those elected in congressional districts defined by them tend to be more Republican than the statewide proportion of Democrats would suggest.

cynwoody proposes a twist on the Nebraska Plan. IMHO if the Republicans can’t do well in a state under the Nebraska Plan, they simply can’t win, period. ‘Course it’s all moot, because IMHO a constitutional amendment to do that would not pass - too many Democrats would understand the implications. Just as too many Republican state governments would oppose any amendment for switching over to a straight popular vote scheme.


54 posted on 12/12/2016 6:31:11 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
So far, all we've heard is the CIA thinks Russia hacked our elections and favored Trump. No evidence presented. So this could be as fake as all the rest of the fake news the media spews out.

I am not a conspiracy theorist by nature but the older I get, the more cynical I have become of what the media and politicians say.

This is obviously timed to either discredit Trump's victory or to try for a re-do of the election. The CIA works for Obama. Led by a Muslim. They are shaking in their boots for fear Trump is coming in to shake their little club up.

Who's to say this whole thing wasn't fabrication by Obama and his CIA to throw attention away from them and onto those evil Ruskies? Projection and deflection of their own responsibility is the liberals' forte.

Just a thought....

55 posted on 12/12/2016 6:31:38 AM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
“Weapons of Mass Destruction,” anyone?

56 posted on 12/12/2016 6:36:47 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Just who the hell are THEY????

I suspect WE will have a say in that.

57 posted on 12/12/2016 6:38:28 AM PST by mware (RETIRED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Trump is playing them like a fiddle!


58 posted on 12/12/2016 6:52:04 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

The machines not connected to the internet have memory cards which are inserted into a computer that uploads to the Global Elections Management System (GEMS).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xvZ3osFg

Guess who controls GEMS?

George Soros.

Soros himself once owned the machines (Diebold) but he sold them to Dominion which also manufactures voting machines and is larger in coverage, present in more counties and states than Diebold.

But guess who retained ownership and control of the IP meaning the software of all the machines?

George Soros.

Does George Soros have a lot of IT people that he could use to throw an election through the software he controls?

You bet he does.

Soros operates an offshore hedge fund “Quantum” in a tax haven in the Caribbean, specifically the Cayman Islands about 150 mi south of Havana, Cuba. The Quantum Fund IT support and traders at workstations number in the hundreds and they operate 24/7.

So Soros has control and he is equipped perfectly to influence elections.

But somewhere along the way it seems his IT people might have been thwarted in any attempt to jigger the numbers in GEMS.

If there was any attempt at hacking GEMS by Russians or Mossad or deep throat FBI persons, those hacks were likely aiming to stop the Soros manipulation of GEMS counts. Those hacks were possibly aimed at shutting off cheating hacks by Soros IT people. It could well have been a Cyberwar and now the democrats along with their RINO accomplices are crowing about “Russian Hackers”.

President Trump needs to call on cCongress to convene a Commission for setting mandatory uniform secure voting system standards in the United States.

Australia is leading the way with Block Chain Technology. Here is how it works:

https://followmyvote.com/online-voting-technology/blockchain-technology

and here is what the Aussies are doing:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3468215/posts


59 posted on 12/12/2016 7:00:48 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Excellent!
Even the libtards that move to rural areas, usually because of the natural beauty of the area, can’t seem to understand where their food, or any other resource comes from. They move to these rural areas which have traditionally been conservative and Christian, and because they won’t take a job working for the mine, oilfield, ranching, logging, etc. they end up being supported by the tax dollars confiscated from those who ARE working. Then they spend their time organizing local environazi groups and protesting those who put food on their plates, electric into their homes, and fuel into their cars. The Department of Propaganda has been very effective at brainwashing all these fools.


60 posted on 12/12/2016 7:09:03 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson