1 posted on
02/23/2010 8:21:35 AM PST by
Palter
To: SunkenCiv
2 posted on
02/23/2010 8:21:50 AM PST by
Palter
(Kilroy was here.)
To: Palter
The site isn't just old, it redefines old: the temple was built 11,500 years ago Impossible. The earth wasn't created yet.
To: Palter
8 posted on
02/23/2010 8:47:49 AM PST by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Palter
No Helen Thomas photos.
Thank you very much.
9 posted on
02/23/2010 8:48:40 AM PST by
tumblindice
(Facts are stubborn things.)
To: Palter
This guys conclusions are a stretch. This complex could just as easily be the site of the first human swap meet.
10 posted on
02/23/2010 8:56:16 AM PST by
anonsquared
(TEA PARTY 2010 - THROW 'EM ALL IN THE HARBOR!)
To: Palter; Quix
Eldritch horrors ping.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
14 posted on
02/23/2010 9:21:27 AM PST by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: Palter
The site isn't just old, it redefines old: the temple was built 11,500 years agoa staggering 7,000 years before the Great Pyramid, and more than 6,000 years before Stonehenge first took shape.Serious question:
How do they know the temple was built 11,500 years ago?
I know about carbon dating and such, but that just tells you how old the rock is, not when somebody built something with it.
22 posted on
02/23/2010 10:28:15 AM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Palter
24 posted on
02/23/2010 10:57:07 AM PST by
Mariner
26 posted on
02/23/2010 4:31:37 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
To: Palter
27 posted on
02/23/2010 4:36:42 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson