Skip to comments.
Believing in Cold Fusion and the E-Cat
Forbes Magazine ^
| Oct 30 2011
| Mark Gibbs
Posted on 10/30/2011 7:52:15 PM PDT by Kevmo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
The Cold Fusion Ping List
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles
http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/30/believing-in-cold-fusion-and-the-e-cat/2/
1
posted on
10/30/2011 7:52:19 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
To: dangerdoc; citizen; Lancey Howard; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; ...
2
posted on
10/30/2011 7:53:55 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
I’m not sure of the logic:
“It’s not a scam because the scammer can’t possibly believe he can get away with the scam?”
3
posted on
10/30/2011 7:57:16 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Kevmo
I really dislike the title of this article. Of course you would, because it points out the fact that, whatever is going on with the E-Cat, it ain't science.
4
posted on
10/30/2011 7:58:24 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
To: Kevmo
Here's the conclusion of Gibb's blog post:
So, as with the other E-Cat tests, were really not much better off than we were prior to the 28th. Weve got reports that sound exciting but theres still no real evidence. Thats not to say some data doesnt exist but until a verifiably objective analysis is conducted by an independent third party that confirms the results match the claims theres no real news, which is utterly disappointing.
5
posted on
10/30/2011 8:00:17 PM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Kevmo
6
posted on
10/30/2011 8:01:03 PM PDT
by
montyspython
(This thread needs more cowbell)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
it ain’t science.
*** No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business.
But that is not why I dislike the title of this article.
7
posted on
10/30/2011 8:04:29 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: montyspython
Now, THAT is how you drive-by on a thread.
T4BTT
Thanks for bumping the thread.
8
posted on
10/30/2011 8:05:28 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: Kevmo
*** No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business. That's what Bernie Madhoff said.
9
posted on
10/30/2011 8:05:56 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
To: Moonman62
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2800058/posts?page=55#55
To: Moonman62
It appears that a relatively innocuous post responding to you was pulled.
This means I have nothing more to say to you about LENR. Bye.
55 posted on Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:41:07 PM by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
10
posted on
10/30/2011 8:06:14 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: Kevmo
11
posted on
10/30/2011 8:06:30 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Bernie was involved in something scientific?
12
posted on
10/30/2011 8:07:02 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: BenLurkin
13
posted on
10/30/2011 8:09:36 PM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: BenLurkin
It is short for Energy Catalyzer. Might as well start with Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer
But hurry up & read it because it is
being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia’s deletion policy
14
posted on
10/30/2011 8:09:36 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: BenLurkin
15
posted on
10/30/2011 8:09:59 PM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Avoid dangerous religious cults, practice safe sects.)
To: Kevmo
Bernie was involved in something scientific? You just said that E-Cat is not science, it's business.
Your words.
Bernie was just engaged in business, too.
16
posted on
10/30/2011 8:10:09 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
To: BenLurkin
What is E-Cat?
The evil twin of lolcat.
17
posted on
10/30/2011 8:10:59 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: SpaceBar
Now, that, is photography!
18
posted on
10/30/2011 8:12:03 PM PDT
by
Clock King
(Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Then why did Bernie say “No, it is not science, unfortunately”
Kevmo: No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business.
EPU: That’s what Bernie Madhoff said.
19
posted on
10/30/2011 8:13:11 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
To: Olog-hai
20
posted on
10/30/2011 8:14:55 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson