Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Believing in Cold Fusion and the E-Cat
Forbes Magazine ^ | Oct 30 2011 | Mark Gibbs

Posted on 10/30/2011 7:52:15 PM PDT by Kevmo

how could something like the E-Cat work in defiance of known science?
Even so, to be completely dismissive of Rossi’s claims would seem to be foolish as it is one thing to *believe* something is false based on your assumptions and quite another to be able to *prove* beyond a reasonable doubt that it is false.
So, before we look at the results of the E-Cat test on the 28th, what of Rossi and the E-Cat? Why has he been so cagey and secretive about the E-Cat and not permitted a reputable third party to conduct an objective performance test? Well, there appear to be two plausible explanations .

The first is that Rossi is honestly mistaken and he just believes the E-Cat works and produces excess energy when, in fact, it doesn’t... it’s hard to believe as Rossi has been collaborating with a well-credentialed physicist and emeritus professor from Bologna University, Sergio Focardi. A failure of this kind would be a sad and unfortunate conclusion for all concerned as they would be discredited and reviled .

The other explanation is that the whole thing is a fraud and that the E-Cat doesn’t work at all. This too is hard to swallow because there would be no obvious upside. What benefit could either Rossi or Focardi hope to gain?
Sure, there may be some money involved but I doubt whether it would be a large enough amount to justify what would be an usually elaborate and public hoax and whoever the funds came from would, almost certainly, start legal proceedings (if not retain the services of a “mechanic”) .


(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: believeorburninhell; cmns; coldfusion; ecat; lenr; pforeverandever; religion; scientism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
The Cold Fusion Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/30/believing-in-cold-fusion-and-the-e-cat/2/

1 posted on 10/30/2011 7:52:19 PM PDT by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; citizen; Lancey Howard; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; ...

I really dislike the title of this article.

The Cold Fusion Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/30/believing-in-cold-fusion-and-the-e-cat/2/


2 posted on 10/30/2011 7:53:55 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I’m not sure of the logic:

“It’s not a scam because the scammer can’t possibly believe he can get away with the scam?”


3 posted on 10/30/2011 7:57:16 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
I really dislike the title of this article.

Of course you would, because it points out the fact that, whatever is going on with the E-Cat, it ain't science.

4 posted on 10/30/2011 7:58:24 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Here's the conclusion of Gibb's blog post:
So, as with the other E-Cat tests, we’re really not much better off than we were prior to the 28th. We’ve got reports that sound exciting but there’s still no real evidence. That’s not to say some data doesn’t exist but until a verifiably objective analysis is conducted by an independent third party that confirms the results match the claims there’s no real news, which is utterly disappointing.

5 posted on 10/30/2011 8:00:17 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

FRAUD


6 posted on 10/30/2011 8:01:03 PM PDT by montyspython (This thread needs more cowbell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

it ain’t science.
*** No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business.
But that is not why I dislike the title of this article.


7 posted on 10/30/2011 8:04:29 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: montyspython

Now, THAT is how you drive-by on a thread.

T4BTT
Thanks for bumping the thread.


8 posted on 10/30/2011 8:05:28 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
*** No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business.

That's what Bernie Madhoff said.

9 posted on 10/30/2011 8:05:56 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/backroom/2800058/posts?page=55#55
To: Moonman62
It appears that a relatively innocuous post responding to you was pulled.
This means I have nothing more to say to you about LENR. Bye.

55 posted on Sunday, October 30, 2011 4:41:07 PM by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


10 posted on 10/30/2011 8:06:14 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

What is “E-Cat”?


11 posted on 10/30/2011 8:06:30 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bernie was involved in something scientific?


12 posted on 10/30/2011 8:07:02 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

13 posted on 10/30/2011 8:09:36 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It is short for Energy Catalyzer. Might as well start with Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer

But hurry up & read it because it is
being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia’s deletion policy


14 posted on 10/30/2011 8:09:36 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

exactly


15 posted on 10/30/2011 8:09:59 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Avoid dangerous religious cults, practice safe sects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
Bernie was involved in something scientific?

You just said that E-Cat is not science, it's business.

Your words.

Bernie was just engaged in business, too.

16 posted on 10/30/2011 8:10:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What is “E-Cat”?
The evil twin of lolcat.
17 posted on 10/30/2011 8:10:59 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Now, that, is photography!


18 posted on 10/30/2011 8:12:03 PM PDT by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Then why did Bernie say “No, it is not science, unfortunately”

Kevmo: No, it is not science, unfortunately; it is business.
EPU: That’s what Bernie Madhoff said.


19 posted on 10/30/2011 8:13:11 PM PDT by Kevmo (Caveat lurkor pro se ipso judicatis: Let the lurker decide for himself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Just don’t anybody dis my girl Alpine Kat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j50ZssEojtM


20 posted on 10/30/2011 8:14:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson