Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman arrested after being 'caught having sex with 15-year-old boy on Thanksgiving Day'
The Daily Mail ^ | 4 December 2011 | NA

Posted on 12/04/2011 4:09:05 PM PST by buccaneer81

A Texas woman was arrested after relatives said they caught her having sex with a 15-year-old boy on Thanksgiving Day. The scene unfolded at a family gathering held on the holiday at a house in Oakridge Forest Lane in Spring.

Police arrested Amanda Billiris, 23, after relatives said they witnessed her having sexual intercourse with the boy, the arrest report states.

The avid motorcycle racer has been charged with sexual assault of a child, a second-degree felony, reports the Houston Courier.

According to the Texas Penal Code, if convicted, she faces between two to 20 years in prison. Ms Billaris may also be fined up to $10,000 if she is found guilty of the offence.

Billaris has been released on bond from the Montgomery County Jail. According to her own statements on the message boards at Motohouston.com, Mr Billiris, suffered serious injuries in a 2009 motorcycle crash when she was returning from a RideSmart event at Texas World Speedway which left her in a critical condition. She said she received a severe blow to the head and kidney injuries.

Ms Billiris, who once owned a white and pink honda, would regularly make posts on Motohouston.com, which is a discussion forum for Houston's local motorcycle riders. On her Facebook page, she lists her college major as 'Communication Studies - Interpersonal'.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 15; aunt; crime; frivolous; frwhoremongers; guilty; moralabsolutes; nephew; petty; roman; sexualassault; spectacle; tx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 next last
To: Nik Naym

“That is part of the reason I wrote in reply 107 the following which apparently you missed or decided to ignore”

That’s rich...you accusing someone of “ignoring” posts.

If that bothers you, feel free to back and choose any one of my questions you ignored. You can do it...you can answer just one.

Or if you can’t, just insult me personally again.


201 posted on 12/04/2011 9:18:52 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

“Woman arrested after being ‘caught having sex with 15-year-old boy on Thanksgiving Day’”

“I believe that a 15 year old boy is old enough to know right from wrong in this situation and should behave accordingly. I believe he should be held accountable for his actions rather than be considered a “victim”.”

Would you agree if the woman was a man and the 15 year old was your daughter?


202 posted on 12/04/2011 9:26:17 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

See his first post, I believe it was #95. He had this to say...

“I do not care what the women around here say - a fifteen year old boy is not a “child” and he is old enough to know what he is doing. If he is doing a 23 year old, he wasn’t forced or coerced.

This is ridiculous.

And yes, I DO have double standards. If a 23 year old male is doing a 15 year old girl he should have his ass handed to him.

It IS different.”

So it is different. Man-girl = gross. Woman-boy = fantasy time.

I find them both disgusting and the marks of a defective mind.


203 posted on 12/04/2011 9:30:27 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

“Would you agree if the woman was a man and the 15 year old was your daughter?”

No. I already addressed that.

I firmly believe there IS a difference between females and males biologically, psychologically, and societally.


204 posted on 12/04/2011 9:36:45 PM PST by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

BS...


205 posted on 12/04/2011 9:38:55 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

So now anyone who doesn’t agree with women being free to seduce boys believes that men and women have no differences?

Interesting leap. My entire argument is based on girls being different from boys...because a boy is easily enticed by sex...immediately...as it is offered. Just the sight of an attractive older woman excites a boy. Girls who are attracted to older men generally have more romantic feelings and are less immediate.

That being said, child rape is child rape. Male, female, boy or girl. A woman who has sex with a 15 year old is most likely a crazy woman who men get fed up with quickly, while a 15 year old boy will endure nearly anything for even the most remote chance. She knows that and plays on it. Men know there are more fish in the sea, and have a limit on the crazy...boys think there might never be another.


206 posted on 12/04/2011 9:45:51 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

“BS...”

You are certainly entitled to your opinion.

If you will allow me to expand on my previous reply I would like to add that if the situation were as you described, and I found that said hypothetical daughter had invited, encouraged and in fact was a willing accomplice then she would not escape proper punishment. And no, I don’t know what would be proper in such a case.

However, the man involved should still be criminally charged. I know you won’t agree but I hope I have made my position clear so that at least you know what it is you are disagreeing with.

If the situation involved a son, then yes, I admit that I do indeed have “double standards” as evidenced by what I said that you prefer to think of as BS.


207 posted on 12/04/2011 9:48:23 PM PST by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

In so many (of Nik’s) words...

Man-girl = rape rape
Woman-boy = rape

That about right, Whoopie?


208 posted on 12/04/2011 9:51:47 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
I agree, there is a difference. Even those on this thread having fits about it admit that a 15 year old boy will do just about anything to get laid. No one says that about a 15 year old girl, because boys and girls (like men and women) are different. I've heard it said that men become intimate in order to have sex, and women have sex in order to achieve intimacy. I think that's pretty much true. A 15 year old girl seduced by a 23 year old man is likely hungering for love and attention, and is getting taken advantage of. A 15 year old boy getting seduced by a 23 year old woman is likely hungering for sex. He's getting exactly what he set out to get, in most cases.

And notice, I said "seduced" in both cases, not "raped." I don't know if the phrase "statutory rape" is particularly helpful. Rape is a specific thing, and seduction is quite different. It's rather like the difference between ticket scalping and being held up at gun point.

209 posted on 12/04/2011 10:01:31 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

You really stole my thunder there. I know it was intended to be me because you make an oblique reference to me. Don’t be afraid to address me directly. Be proud of your defense of unlimited woman-boy sex, unhindered by those pesky morals masquerading as laws.

Wait...no, I headed you off at the pass with post #206.

But I like the way you put it too. Next time, instead of just expounding upon what I said just say, Brad, I agree with you.


210 posted on 12/04/2011 10:06:02 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady; Nik Naym
Nik,

When you said this in post 89

Post 89

"I do not care what the women around here say - a fifteen year old boy is not a “child” and he is old enough to know what he is doing"

was A_perfect_lady included with the "women around here" or do you know something we don't know?

A_perfect_lady,

Are you aware that your opinions are worthless in Nik's eyes?
211 posted on 12/04/2011 10:16:14 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

“A 15 year old girl seduced by a 23 year old man is likely hungering for love and attention, and is getting taken advantage of. “

Exactly. And that is why I think it is worse in this case than an older female/younger male scenario. the psychological damage to the girl is likely to be great. In a case where the boy is 15 and the girl is in her early 20s for example, the boy is likely to be bragging to his friends, not ready to slit his wrists.

You bring up another thing to consider and that is that if a girl gets the appropriate love attention and respect from her father she is much less likely to fall for such a ploy from an older man. Maybe this is why I family never had to deal with such problems with my daughter. I would like to think so anyway. (She sure turned out to be a good kid. Well, adult now, I suppose LOL)


212 posted on 12/04/2011 10:17:57 PM PST by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym

So in both your opinions all women who married at the age of 12 in the past were “psychologically damaged?” What is the nature of this damage? Does it have a name? Or will you admit that women in the past married much younger than they did today with no damage to the women?

Is the difference the stability of the domestic situation in the past (which is what I’d tend to believe)? So would that then make the statutory rape of a female ok as long as you stayed together and supported her? Your post-apocalyptic future sounds interesting.

While the boy is “bragging to his friends” (which I don’t disagree with) what is the adult seducer doing? What does she get out of it?

Sex is hardly hard to find for any woman. No matter how ugly the woman is there is a man out there who is uglier and desperate.

So what does the adult woman get out of it? Could it be that she enjoys the power? The control? The ability to demand anything?

What is she getting from the boy that a man can’t give her? When you discover the answer to that you’ll understand why older women seducing boys is immoral and rightfully illegal.


213 posted on 12/04/2011 10:26:25 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
Yes. It's just really bizarre to see this blindspot on Free Republic. Generally, conservatives are the one group able to admit that males and females differ.

Also interesting is how perceptions vary. For instance, according to this lawyer's 2008 website (http://www.dallascriminaldefenselawyerblog.com/2008/05/texas-age-of-consent-law.html), a child is defined as anyone under 17 who is not your spouse. According to another site, you can marry in Texas at 16 if you have written parental consent, or if you have received an order from the Texas district court authorizing your marriage.

So the definition of a "child" is very fluid. At 16 or 17, you're a child unless you're married. They also have a "Romeo & Juliet" clause, so if the woman had been a few years younger, she would not be charged even if he was 15 and she was, at 18, a legal adult.

214 posted on 12/04/2011 10:29:35 PM PST by A_perfect_lady (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

[ Billaris has been released on bond from the Montgomery County Jail. According to her own statements on the message boards at Motohouston.com, Mr Billiris, suffered serious injuries in a 2009 motorcycle crash when she was returning from a RideSmart event at Texas World Speedway which left her in a critical condition. She said she received a severe blow to the head and kidney injuries. ]

Must have been one heck of a head injury for her to think it was a good idea to try schlepping her Nephew.


215 posted on 12/04/2011 10:42:02 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

What would you say is the age at which a boy shouldn’t be seduced by an adult?

Do you have a hard limit or should it be taken on a case by case basis?

Additionally, I have heard that males and females differ. You seem to have some knowledge of this...could you perhaps flesh out your ideas a little for me? It is driving me crazy as you have perhaps guessed. You’re a wily foe.


216 posted on 12/04/2011 10:55:36 PM PST by BradWesleyoftheInternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
What is sad is that so many are saying “Hey that is cool!”

It screws up boys like it screws up girls. But that isn't what many here want to fantasize about.

217 posted on 12/05/2011 5:23:29 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Sea Parrot
The “Mr” got confused me for a minute.

These days it could be a toss up between a dumb reporter or a reversed Chaz.

218 posted on 12/05/2011 5:46:26 AM PST by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81; Lazamataz; GQuagmire

Couldn’t see the pics here, so I went on teh Googlez...

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2011/12/amanda_billiris_police_relativ.php

Probable Cause, but send her to chambers for a spanking


219 posted on 12/05/2011 6:05:17 AM PST by JRios1968 (I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Looks psycho to me.

The crazy ones are always the best in bed.

220 posted on 12/05/2011 6:38:24 AM PST by Lazamataz (That's all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-233 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson